Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libero Sports LLC: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 17:31, 25 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 00:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Libero Sports LLC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to rely on a single Goal.com source. There is an official website and so this company definitely exists but I can't seem to find any other reliable sources covering this that are independent of the subject. I, therefore, fear that this fails WP:GNG. Spiderone 12:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 07:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP. Anup [Talk] 18:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not only is it simply stating what there is to know about the company and its business, it goes to list its clients which is a notorious sign of advertising. SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:N, WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – no evidence of sufficient notability. A single self-published source falls well short of the requirements. C 679 13:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 :<small>Note: This discussion has been included in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves|WikiProject Football]]'s list of association football-related deletions. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color:#996600; font-size:small;">Spiderone</span>]] 12:38, 25 September 2016 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Delete''' - no evidence of notability. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 07:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''': Fails [[WP:NCORP]]. [[User:Anupmehra|<font color="blue">Anup</font>]] [[User_talk:Anupmehra|<font color="blue">[Talk]</font>]] 18:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''': Fails [[WP:NCORP]]. [[User:Anupmehra|<span style="color: blue;">Anup</span>]] [[User_talk:Anupmehra|<span style="color: blue;">[Talk]</span>]] 18:56, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' as not only is it simply stating what there is to know about the company and its business, it goes to list its clients which is a notorious sign of advertising. [[User:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">'''S'''wister'''T'''wister</span>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]] 19:47, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' fails [[WP:N]], [[WP:NCORP]] and [[WP:GNG]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]] / [[WP:FOUR]] / [[WP:CHICAGO]] / [[WP:WAWARD]])</small> 05:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
-*'''Delete''' – no evidence of sufficient notability. A single self-published source falls well short of the requirements. <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Cloudz679|C]][[:User talk:Cloudz679|<span style="color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD;">679</span>]]</font> 13:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' – no evidence of sufficient notability. A single self-published source falls well short of the requirements. <span style="font-family: Century Gothic;">[[User:Cloudz679|C]][[:User talk:Cloudz679|<span style="color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration: inherit; -moz-text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD; text-decoration-color: #6A5ACD;">679</span>]]</span> 13:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 {{clear}}
 :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>