Talk:WaferTech: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Is there coverage in reliable, third party sources? Has the company done anything to satisfy [[WP:CORP]]? One doesn't get that impression from reading the article as it stands. Also, how can a company be a "pure play" (stock market term) when it's privately held? Who out there can "play" it? [[User:Deranged bulbasaur|Deranged bulbasaur]] 07:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC) |
:Is there coverage in reliable, third party sources? Has the company done anything to satisfy [[WP:CORP]]? One doesn't get that impression from reading the article as it stands. Also, how can a company be a "pure play" (stock market term) when it's privately held? Who out there can "play" it? [[User:Deranged bulbasaur|Deranged bulbasaur]] 07:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
The following link might be illuminating, maybe even a good external reference: |
|||
http://sec.edgar-online.com/1996/07/16/00/0000950135-96-003097/Section2.asp <small>[[User:Mgoerner|Matthias]]</small> |
|||
Revision as of 07:17, 13 March 2007
Talk:WaferTech
I suggest keeping this page for the following reasons: 1. WaferTech is the largest pure-play foundry in the United States. 2. It is one of the largest employers in Clark County, Washington. 3. The company is recognized as a major firm in Silicon Forest (after Intel of course). I will continue to add more information as I dig it up. Rms1 06:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Rms1
- Is there coverage in reliable, third party sources? Has the company done anything to satisfy WP:CORP? One doesn't get that impression from reading the article as it stands. Also, how can a company be a "pure play" (stock market term) when it's privately held? Who out there can "play" it? Deranged bulbasaur 07:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
The following link might be illuminating, maybe even a good external reference: http://sec.edgar-online.com/1996/07/16/00/0000950135-96-003097/Section2.asp Matthias