Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women scientists: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women scientists/Archive 4) (bot |
→Capitalization?: new section |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
Kind regards, |
Kind regards, |
||
[[User:Shoodho|Shoodho]] |
[[User:Shoodho|Shoodho]] |
||
== Capitalization? == |
|||
At the moment, the lede and the title of this page differ in capitalization. I think I would lean toward preferring the title case version all around, but thoughts? [[User:BhamBoi|BhamBoi]] ([[User talk:BhamBoi|talk]]) 21:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:33, 7 April 2023
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Women scientists:
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Female scientists from third world countries
Jimbo likes the idea of paying editors to write about female scientists from third world countries.[1]
May 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Wiki Women in Red - a proposed User Group
Having worked for 2 years editing articles for Women In Red, a group of organizers have concluded that sourcing is one of the biggest hurdles in creating articles on women and non-binary genders. Though it is true that a lot of sourcing simply doesn’t exist, it is also true that there are sources, but we have no access to them. As these groups did not typically become subjects for academic study until the 1970s, many of the sources are not on line or are behind paywalls. Failure to include women and non-binary people in the encyclopedia presents a one-dimensional view of society and history. To address those issues, we are forming a new User Group aimed at referencing and support for like-minded groups and would appreciate your input or input from your supporters in our organizational process. See link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Women_in_Red MauraWen (talk) 09:25 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in the #SheSaid Campaign 2021
We are delighted to share with you that the #SheSaid Campaign will be running again this year and you are invited to participate in Oct/Nov 2021.The goal is to celebrate notable women and add more entries on Wikiquote. Please have a look at some of the cool bookmarks we have completed and ready for you to print if you wish to do so. If you would like to have the editable version of the bookmark please contact me at Shoodho , visit some sample of bookmarks here:Bookmarks.For more information, please visit the campaign page here:SheSaid page If you have any questions or query please feel free to contact Islahaddow, Anthere or Shoodho.
Kind regards, Shoodho
Capitalization?
At the moment, the lede and the title of this page differ in capitalization. I think I would lean toward preferring the title case version all around, but thoughts? BhamBoi (talk) 21:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Project-Class biography pages
- Project-Class biography (science and academia) pages
- NA-importance biography (science and academia) pages
- Science and academia work group articles
- Project-Class Women's History pages
- NA-importance Women's History pages
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Project-Class science pages
- NA-importance science pages
- Project-Class WikiProject Women pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Project-Class Women scientists pages
- NA-importance Women scientists pages
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press