Talk:Hattusa: Difference between revisions
assess for VA |
Njardarlogar (talk | contribs) →Turkish name: new section |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 07:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC) |
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 07:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Turkish name == |
|||
I see the Turkish name is listed here, but I wonder why. Is the Turkish name a descendant (through one or more borrowings) from the Hittite word? If not, it does not seem much more relevant for this article than the name in any other language. --[[User:Njardarlogar|Njardarlogar]] ([[User talk:Njardarlogar|talk]]) 11:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:05, 9 April 2023
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Template:Anatolian Civilizations Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Doesn't Render to PDF
The Hattusa page does not render to PDF format; it goes to 75% and quits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.212.244 (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Commented link doesn't really work
After downloading both font packages, the Sumerian script on the other page works, but the Hittite characters still don't display correctly. Anyone have a fix or better font set? -114.91.70.171 (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC) REgion Europe/North America?Is that correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.48.253.122 (talk) 11:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Ha...what?
So it's obvious that the Hittite/Nesite language didn't really stick to the cuneiform's syllabic format. However, the name of the city has been rendered Hattusa, Hattusas, Hattusha, Hattushash... So what is it?
First, Ḫattuša and Ḫattušaš seem to both appear (cp. this page and the Hittite language page, which gives Hattusas.) So were the terms identical and interchangable? or is one preferable?
Second, Ḫattuša (or Ḫattušaš) is apparently the preferred scholarly transcription, where Ḫ is a non-English (and possibly pre-proto-Indo-European sound) well-deserving of its own symbol and š is just an inappropriate Slavic character elsewhere universally used to mark ʃ, the English "sh" and Turkish "ş."
But if you go to the š page or the page on the Hittite language, it appears š is being completely misleadingly used to transcribe the sound "s" instead. Whether this is because of historical reasons (early work mistakingly believing the /ʃ/ sound was being described) or orthographic ones (perhaps the Hittites consistantly used the marker for Akkadian /ʃ/ for their /s/), why isn't the inappropriate "š" being dropped now since it obviously leads people to write the name Hattusha? Or should the Hittite language page be rewritten to clarify that we don't know whether it is the /s/ or /ʃ/ phoneme? -114.91.70.171 (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- This page on Hittite grammar suggests -s is the standard nominative animate singular. I'm not sure why a city would count as animate, but if that's where the -s is coming from, it is part of the native name and has just been incorrectly removed when parsing over to genderless English. Perhaps scholars nix it so they can employ the word in various grammatical positions without feeling awkward, but it's pretty standard to bring over the nominative endings when employing such terms in English. It doesn't make any more sense to remove the ending than to talk about "Juli Caesar" of "Rom" or his killer "Brut." -114.91.70.171 (talk) 16:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent question, and I have not the expertise to offer an opinion. I will note that Unesco seems to use 'Hattusha'. WP does have a policy of using the most well known names for things, so I checked with Google, and got the following results:
- Hattusa has about 126,000 hits
- Hattusas about 62,400 hits
- Hattusha has about 86,700 hits
- So 'Hattusa' may not be academically the most correct, but it does seem to be the most common (q.v. Socrates, etc etc). Noel (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Kadeš, Hattuša
Both cities carried similar name. Several people rather translate those Hittite etymologies through Semitic (hebrew) instead through Hittite, Indo European... Because the term Kad, Hat means "Hittite" and Tusha or Deža(dežela in Slovene) or Deza (sanskrit) simply means "Land, country"; so "land of hittites"; "hittite land"; Kadeš; Kadeza; Hattusha — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.143.97.3 (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hattusa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120527064520/http://www.hattuscha.de/English/cityhistory1.htm to http://www.hattuscha.de/English/cityhistory1.htm
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5nEDEci9U?url=http://www.hattuscha.de/English/english1.htm to http://www.hattuscha.de/English/english1.htm
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5nEDEci9U?url=http://www.hattuscha.de/English/english1.htm to http://www.hattuscha.de/English/english1.htm
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120527064520/http://www.hattuscha.de/English/cityhistory1.htm to http://www.hattuscha.de/English/cityhistory1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Turkish name
I see the Turkish name is listed here, but I wonder why. Is the Turkish name a descendant (through one or more borrowings) from the Hittite word? If not, it does not seem much more relevant for this article than the name in any other language. --Njardarlogar (talk) 11:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Mid-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment
- B-Class Turkey articles
- Mid-importance Turkey articles
- All WikiProject Turkey pages
- B-Class Archaeology articles
- Mid-importance Archaeology articles
- B-Class World Heritage Sites articles
- Mid-importance World Heritage Sites articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages