User talk:CAPTAIN JTK: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Quabizabdul: new section |
Di.e Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archives}} |
{{Archives}} |
||
== Dark ages == |
|||
hey. Can you remove the delhi sultanate part atleast. Those were the dark ages of india. The economy of the subcontinent declined. All the great Universities like Nalanda , vikramshila Sharda peeth were destroyed, combined with thousands of temples.hundreds and thousands of people were sold into central Asian and arab slave trade. Execution of people took at a incredibly large numbers. |
|||
Scientific and technological advancement literally stopped in their age . |
|||
The source which has been used is an extremely biased view . [[Special:Contributions/103.81.215.136|103.81.215.136]] ([[User talk:103.81.215.136|talk]]) 17:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Quabizabdul == |
== Quabizabdul == |
||
Revision as of 17:09, 13 April 2023
|
||
Quabizabdul
There is not a single historian who says that delhi sultanate and mughal era was golden age of india. You can check it. The claim and source here is used is of completely random author which is not backed by any historical evidence or a historian. Every historian agree only gupta age was the golden age of india 103.81.215.136 (talk) 17:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)