Jump to content

Talk:Kičinica: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 20: Line 20:
:4. See [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_on_discussion_pages#Personal_point_of_view]]
:4. See [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_on_discussion_pages#Personal_point_of_view]]
:There you go. [[User:Alltan|Alltan]] ([[User talk:Alltan|talk]]) 15:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
:There you go. [[User:Alltan|Alltan]] ([[User talk:Alltan|talk]]) 15:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
::1. Then why did you remove that change?
::2. Page 174 talks about education in Polog in general, Kičinica is not mentioned, Macedonianization is not mentioned, population figures are not mentioned. Page 153 talks about population figures of [[Ribnica, Mavrovo and Rostuša]]. The table above it is population figures for [[Rostuša]]. Again, no mention of Kičinica.
::3. Page 156 talks about population figures of [[Trebište]]. The table above it is population figures for [[Tanuše]]. Again, no mention of Kičinica.
::4. I think you should read it more closely - it states that: ''Such arguments are purely personal point-of-view. They make no use of policies, guidelines, or even logic.'' I have a policy which backs up my view ([[WP:NOTEVERYTHING]]).
::So again, why did you revert the changes [[User:Alltan|Alltan]]? [[User:Kluche|Kluche]] ([[User talk:Kluche|talk]]) 16:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:13, 17 April 2023

WikiProject iconNorth Macedonia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject North Macedonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North Macedonia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Strange revert

Alltan I'd like an explination as to why did you revert my changes?

1. I updated the infobox population data (from 2002 to 2021). What's the issue here?

2. I fixed the Islami citation - no where is Kičinica, nor any of the other content which the source should back up mentioned on page 153 or 174. Kičinica is however mentioned on page 146, and I fixed the citation. Macedonianization is no where to be mentioned in the source, neither on page 153, 174 or 146, hence it was removed. What's the dispute here?

3. D.M. Brancoff and his statistics are not mentioned on page 156, nor on any of the above stated pages, hence it was removed.

4. I shortened the paragraph about the 1927 newspaper report - the enitre quote is absolutly uneeded (WP:NOTEVERYTHING), and the summary of "Serbs who only speak Albanian" still conveys the point to the reader. I'll use this opprotunity to to suggest for the quotation mark to be removed i.e the full sentence to read - The village is mentioned in 1927 by the Serbian newspaper "Vreme", where the population is described as Serbs who only speak Albanian.

Again, please state as to why did you revert the edit. Regards. Kluche (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Believe it or not my issue is not with the updating of the infobox data.
2. Kicinica is mentioned both in 174 and in 153. The dispute here exists is you have misread the source.
3. They are.
4. See [[1]]
There you go. Alltan (talk) 15:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
1. Then why did you remove that change?
2. Page 174 talks about education in Polog in general, Kičinica is not mentioned, Macedonianization is not mentioned, population figures are not mentioned. Page 153 talks about population figures of Ribnica, Mavrovo and Rostuša. The table above it is population figures for Rostuša. Again, no mention of Kičinica.
3. Page 156 talks about population figures of Trebište. The table above it is population figures for Tanuše. Again, no mention of Kičinica.
4. I think you should read it more closely - it states that: Such arguments are purely personal point-of-view. They make no use of policies, guidelines, or even logic. I have a policy which backs up my view (WP:NOTEVERYTHING).
So again, why did you revert the changes Alltan? Kluche (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]