Wikipedia:GLAM/GibraltarpediA/Discussion: Difference between revisions

The Gibraltarpedia template mentions ratings on a quality scale and on an importance scale, and provides links to Wikipedia:GLAM/GibraltarpediA/Assessment, however that page provides no details. How are articles given ratings when no scales are provided? TheOverflow (talk) 01:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I've just been using my own judgement on the ones I've assessed so far but I notice that WikiProject Gibraltar links here and here which I don't think is overly relevant. How do other WikiProjects do it? --Gibmetal 77^{talk 2 me} 11:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:12, 18 June 2013 edit Gibmetal77 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 14,656 edits How do other do it? ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:32, 21 April 2023 edit undo MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) Tag: AWB
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The Gibraltarpedia template mentions ratings on a quality scale and on an importance scale, and provides links to [[Wikipedia:GLAM/GibraltarpediA/Assessment]], however that page provides no details. How are articles given ratings when no scales are provided? [[User:TheOverflow\|TheOverflow]] ([[User talk:TheOverflow\|talk]]) 01:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)		The Gibraltarpedia template mentions ratings on a quality scale and on an importance scale, and provides links to [[Wikipedia:GLAM/GibraltarpediA/Assessment]], however that page provides no details. How are articles given ratings when no scales are provided? [[User:TheOverflow\|TheOverflow]] ([[User talk:TheOverflow\|talk]]) 01:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
	:Good point. I've just been using my own judgement on the ones I've assessed so far but I notice that WikiProject Gibraltar [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment\|links here]] and [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria\|here]] which I don't think is overly relevant. How do other WikiProjects do it? --[[User:Gibmetal77\|<span style="margin:0;text-align:left;color:#FF7F00;font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold;padding:0.2em 0.4em">Gibmetal 77</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Gibmetal77\|<~~font~~ ~~color~~="#~~99 32 CC~~">talk 2 me</~~font~~>]]</sup> 11:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)		:Good point. I've just been using my own judgement on the ones I've assessed so far but I notice that WikiProject Gibraltar [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment\|links here]] and [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Criteria\|here]] which I don't think is overly relevant. How do other WikiProjects do it? --[[User:Gibmetal77\|<span style="margin:0;text-align:left;color:#FF7F00;font-size:80%;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold;padding:0.2em 0.4em">Gibmetal 77</span>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Gibmetal77\|<span style="color:#9932CC;">talk 2 me</span>]]</sup> 11:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)