User talk:Xlea Nollmav: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:55, 28 April 2023

Welcome!

Hello, Xlea Nollmav!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Fettlemap (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Springbar (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of advertising verbiage about quality and other promotional tones is still in the article. Needs to be rewritten neutrally by someone not associated with the company. Whole sections of the article remain unreferenced and seem to point to website's Our History sections rather than independent coverage by external news sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Springbar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xlea Nollmav! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Springbar (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The submission is still exceptionally promotional. There is a reason WP:COI editing is strongly discouraged.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Springbar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Springbar (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Even with everything referenced and promotional tone fixed, the company does not meet WP:NCORP. References in the draft fail WP:ORGCRIT and a quick search online found nothing better.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Springbar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question...

Are you an employee of the company or are they your client? Not important as you have declared your paid status but just curious. Also, you do need to hit that Resubmit button for it to be considered. If the draft is accepted you or anyone affiliated with company should not edit it directly but rather make WP:edit requests (there is a handy WP:Edit Request wizard). S0091 (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091Springbar is a client. And, yes, resubmitting would be good! Thanks for the insight! Xlea Nollmav (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:53, 28 April 2023 edit S0091 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 98,802 edits →Question...: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:55, 28 April 2023 edit undo Xlea Nollmav (talk \| contribs) 84 edits →Question...: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 122:		Line 122:

	Are you an employee of the company or are they your client? Not important as you have declared your paid status but just curious. Also, you do need to hit that Resubmit button for it to be considered. If the draft is accepted you or anyone affiliated with company should not edit it directly but rather make [[WP:edit requests]] (there is a handy [[WP:Edit Request wizard]]). [[User:S0091\|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091\|talk]]) 18:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)		Are you an employee of the company or are they your client? Not important as you have declared your paid status but just curious. Also, you do need to hit that Resubmit button for it to be considered. If the draft is accepted you or anyone affiliated with company should not edit it directly but rather make [[WP:edit requests]] (there is a handy [[WP:Edit Request wizard]]). [[User:S0091\|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091\|talk]]) 18:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

			:@[[User:S0091\|S0091]]Springbar is a client. And, yes, resubmitting would be good! Thanks for the insight! [[User:Xlea Nollmav\|Xlea Nollmav]] ([[User talk:Xlea Nollmav#top\|talk]]) 18:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)