Talk:Brain training: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:03, 2 May 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brain training article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Alternative views Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Neuroscience Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Brain training.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Louisiana State University Shreveport/Principles and Theories of Learning (PSYC 706) (Summer 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2020 and 25 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Marenaw.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the Brain Training article: Ideas

I am very much a newbie just getting my feet wet through the Wikipedia Fellows program. I will be able to free considerable time in February (two days a week0 to focusing on this topic. Here are some incipent ideas for improvement: Ideas for improving:

A. Add to commercial programs listed:

1) LearningRX

2) Luminosity

3) Neuronation

4) BrainHQ (Posit Science)

B. Add information about marketing:Sharpbrain.com Virtual conferences

C. Add scientific research references.

<a href="https://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/a-guide-to-cognitive-fitness">Harvard Medical School Guide to Cognitive Fitness</a>
<a href="https://www.alz.org/brain-health/brain_health_overview.asp">Alzheimer's Association Articles</a>
<a href="http://www.corebrainjournal.com/2017/04/107-brain-health-alzheimers-revisted-braun/">Dr. Michelle Braun's insights (also visit her Psychology Today blogs and her web page): </a>
<a href="http://www.oprah.com/health_wellness/steps-to-take-now-to-prevent-dementia/all#.WqvBpUhIdWg.email">A recent Oprah wellness presentation</a>
<a href="https://brainhealth.nia.nih.gov">National Institute of Health/ Aging Resources</a>
<a href="http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/reports/2017/preventing-cognitive-decline-and-dementia-a-way-forward.aspx">Preventing Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Way Forward (2017)</a>
<a href="https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/">The Human Brain Project</a>
<a href="https://www.aarp.org/health/brain-health/global-council-on-brain-health/?cmp=RDRCT-GCBH_Main_10_26_015">The Global Council on Brain Health</a>
<a href="https://wexnermedical.osu.edu/neurological-institute/departments-and-centers/research-centers/center-for-brain-health-and-performance/news-and-events">Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center</a>
<a href="https://www.sfn.org/public-outreach/brainfacts-dot-org">Brainfacts.org</a>

Ddscuriousdavid (talk) 15:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oprah.com?

No. Most too commercial and WP:OR. Zezen (talk) 08:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neuroplasticity overlap

I have linked to neuroplasticity and will be moving some things across. I suggest trying to avoid an overlap. Amousey (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Examples please

Much as other places on the Internet I've found, this Wikipedia article doesn't seem to provide any concrete examples of activities performed to accomplish brain training / retraining. Without that, it's very difficult to know what we're actually talking about. Are these trade secrets? If not, I would advise adding several examples and explaining the purpose of each. If so, I would advise saying so in the article. 75.174.86.18 (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What for? The import of this article is that they do not work. Zezen (talk) 08:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would be curious to see if any do work. Have any studies of any techniques been shown to be effective, or are they all unequivocally useless? I'm not sure this has been completely researched enough to consider it a closed consideration. Itsallinthedetails (talk) 04:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 What for? The import of this article is that they do not work.
 [[User:Zezen|Zezen]] ([[User talk:Zezen|talk]]) 08:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
+:I would be curious to see if any do work. Have ''any'' studies of ''any'' techniques been shown to be effective, or are they all unequivocally useless? I'm not sure this has been completely researched enough to consider it a closed consideration. [[User:Itsallinthedetails|Itsallinthedetails]] ([[User talk:Itsallinthedetails|talk]]) 04:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)