Wikipedia talk:Getting to Philosophy: Difference between revisions
I added one of my own questions |
m Signing comment by 107.185.8.191 - "I added one of my own questions" |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:Name -> Referent -> Name is one [[User:Clayel|Clayel]] ([[User talk:Clayel|talk]]) 00:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC) |
:Name -> Referent -> Name is one [[User:Clayel|Clayel]] ([[User talk:Clayel|talk]]) 00:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC) |
||
I must be doing something wrong; I always go back through etymology pages until I end up on Wiktionary instead. Am I breaking the rules? Should I maybe only go to Wikipedia links? --timhortonsconspiracist who is hopeless without the visual editor; go ahead and change this part if you're good at source editing |
I must be doing something wrong; I always go back through etymology pages until I end up on Wiktionary instead. Am I breaking the rules? Should I maybe only go to Wikipedia links? --timhortonsconspiracist who is hopeless without the visual editor; go ahead and change this part if you're good at source editing <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.185.8.191|107.185.8.191]] ([[User talk:107.185.8.191#top|talk]]) 22:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 22:51, 8 May 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Getting to Philosophy page. |
|
Archives: 1 |
TikTok video
I learned about Getting to Philosophy from this TikTok video. = paul2520 💬 15:55, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- This might not be the best forum to discuss anecdotes... Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines Adeeta (talk) 21:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Cited example no longer true?
The section "Method summarized" states that as of Dec 9, 2021, there is a chain from this article (Getting to Philosophy) to the article on Philosophy. This no longer seems to be the case. The article for Fact now seems to lead back to True via the first blue link. I am not experienced enough with wikipedia revisions to know for sure what has changed, but this means that any path to philosophy that goes through the Fact article now ends up in a loop.
This means that the cited example in this article is no longer true. The statistics about the number of articles which eventually lead back to Philosophy are also probably drastically reduced due to this new loop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.231.52 (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Edit:
the above does appear to be the case, as on Dec 17th a link to True was added in the first line of Fact:
https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Fact&diff=1060708543&oldid=1052461341 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.231.52 (talk) 00:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- In the truth page, if the links for fact and reality were switched, it would go like this:
- 172.112.210.32 (talk) 01:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Philosophy number
I feel like it would be a good idea to say how many pages take 1 click to philosophy or 2 or 3 etc. Maybe the number of clicks it takes to get there would be its philosophy number, with Philosophy being 0 and eg. phenomenon or heirarchy being 1 click away, having a philosophy number of 1
Periodicpro18 (talk) 20:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
This applies to this article
Very cool 2600:8800:8C80:2060:925:5291:62E2:8E0C (talk) 09:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Longest Path (as of 12/19/22)
So I was putting together a side project about this phenomenon, taking all articles and finding their lengths to Philosophy, and I think I found a contender for the longest path: Parmouti 12. Thanks to the structure of the "Coptic Calendar" pages, it goes from that day backwards through the calendar until it reaches Thout 1, which then links to Coptic calendar due to the next previous link not existing, which then follows a standard route through some religious pages until reaching Philosophy. In total, the path is a whopping 241 articles long! I feel like something of this sort of significance should be encapsulated somewhere in the page, but I'm not sure where it would go, especially since I don't have a source besides my own research. It's especially interesting since the next longest link is from Paoni 12, which is another article about the Coptic calendar, but that's only 61 articles away (since there isn't a page for Parmouti 30).
Interestingly, if each of these articles first linked to Coptic calendar, they would have links of 20. If they instead linked to the page for their month, they wouldn't reach Philosophy at all (they would loop at Mathematics)! JazzHandsIncarnate (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also mildly interesting, the next longest non-Coptic calendar path I could find is from Eochaid Gonnat, at 46 articles long. This path is as long as it is because each of the articles following it start with "X, son of Y", with Y being a link to their parent. JazzHandsIncarnate (talk) 20:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Articles that dont lead to philosophy
Ive been following this as a school project, so far i've only found one link that does not lead to philosophy and that is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karoline_Hausted as it leads all to dead links, i'm not sure if this counts or not but it would be interesting to see what other pages don't end up at philosophy. 197.159.50.163 (talk) 10:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Name -> Referent -> Name is one Clayel (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
I must be doing something wrong; I always go back through etymology pages until I end up on Wiktionary instead. Am I breaking the rules? Should I maybe only go to Wikipedia links? --timhortonsconspiracist who is hopeless without the visual editor; go ahead and change this part if you're good at source editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.185.8.191 (talk) 22:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)