Template:Did you know nominations/Alfred Verdross

Alfred Verdross

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Alfred Verdross in 1927

• ... that in the 1930s Alfred Verdross (pictured), a renowned Austrian international lawyer and future judge of the European Court of Human Rights, sympathized with National Socialism? Source: https://geschichte.univie.ac.at/de/personen/alfred-verdross-drossberg
  • ALT1: ... that Alfred Verdross (pictured), a renowned Austrian international lawyer and future judge of the European Court of Human Rights, was allowed to resume teaching international law in Vienna in 1939 through the intervention of Nazi General Alfred Jodl? Source: Busch, Jürgen (2012). "Ein Mann des Widerspruchs? Teil 1. Verdross im Gefüge der Wiener Völkerrechtswissenschaft vor und nach 1938". In Meissel, Franz-Stefan; Reiter-Zatloukal, Ilse; Schima, Stefan (eds.). Vertriebenes Recht - Vertreibendes Recht. Zur Geschichte der Wiener Rechts- und Staatswissenschaftlichen Fakultät zwischen 1938 und 1945 (in German). Wien: Manz. Pdf available at https://www.academia.edu/6762811/Alfred_Verdross_Ein_Mann_des_Widerspruchs_Teil_1_Verdross_im_Gef%C3%BCge_der_Wiener_V%C3%B6lkerrechtswissenschaft_vor_und_nach_1938
  • Reviewed: [[]]

Created by Gitz6666 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:59, 11 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Alfred Verdross; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - one thing
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems: - one question

QPQ: None required.

Overall: @Gitz6666: Good article. AGF on foreign sources. Though, should "After the end of World War II, Verdross continued his career without undergoing the denazification process." be cited? Also, should the hook just say nazism instead of national socialism since they mean the same thing? Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, @Onegreatjoke: You are right on both accounts. I've just added a citation to support the that sentence ([1]) and I agree that "nazism" would be way better in the hook. --Gitz (talk) (contribs) 07:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

P.S. I'm having trouble replying to your comment. When I try, I get The "reply" link cannot be used to reply to this comment. To reply, please use the full page editor by clicking "Edit source" and when I use the page editor, for some reason I can't add my signature using the "Insert" button - I have to manually insert the four tildes. I just hope this isn't a problem and that you get my ping. --Gitz (talk) (contribs) 07:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Looks good now. Though, you're supposed to reply through source editing by default because that's what DYK does for some reason. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Struck ALT1. As I mentioned in my edit summary, it's way over the limit of 200 characters, and it hasn't been trimmed as I suggested. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 23:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)