Jump to content

User talk:HerkusMonte: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
Replaced content with '{{archivebox|auto=yes}} {{clear}}'
Tag: Replaced
Line 2: Line 2:


{{clear}}
{{clear}}
== Precious anniversary ==

{{User QAIbox
| title = Precious
| image = Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
| image_upright = 0.45
| bold = [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#HerkusMonte|Four years!]]
}}
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Six years now! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

== [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nun, Brüder, sind wir frohgemut]] ==

HerkusMonte, there is a problem with the review you posted here: there is no icon indicating what the result of the review is.

The problem seems to be that you have not filled out the {{tl|DYK checklist}} template correctly. In particular, the instructions for the "status" field, which causes an icon to be displayed, are as follows: {{tq|Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look}}. You haven't used any of these values, so no icon appears.

Please return to the review at your earliest convenience to fix the template and complete your review. Thank you very much. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, HerkusMonte. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=866998124 -->

==DYK nomination of Hans Bredow==
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Hans Bredow]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Hans Bredow|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

{{User QAIbox
| title = [[User:Gerda Arendt/Images 2019|April]]
| image = Waldsauerklee, Rauenthal.jpg
| image_upright = 0.7
| bold =
| normal = ... with thanks from [[WP:QAI|QAI]]
}}
Thank you for the article! It's also featured on [[Portal:Germany]]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

== Königsberg ==

Hello HerhusMonte, your sweeping reversal - what do you mean by "POVish", please - has put back all the poor English copyedits and such unfortunate and colossal bloomers like describing Hebrew script as "Yiddish" for the city's name! Is it possible you could be more exacting and helpful in your editing?? --[[User:Po Mieczu|Po Mieczu]] ([[User talk:Po Mieczu|talk]]) 12:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

:{{ping|Po Mieczu}} Why did you move specific languages to the top? I don't see any reason to split the names like that. I'm unable to read Hebrew, I guess it's just the specific spelling of the Yiddish "Kenigsberg" in Hebrew letters.I don't think it's actually a different name.

:Calling the [[Albertina]] an "initially Polish and Lithunaian intellectual center“ is an [[WP:Exceptional claims|exceptional claim]] which needs a much better source than the source you provided (a [[wayback machine]] version of "Albertina on postcards and stamps"). The Albertina was a German language University from the start, your selective choice of notable students shows a significant national (POVish) bias.

:You replaced a section header [[Duchy of Prussia]] with [[Polish Prussia]]. Polish Prussia is a term used for [[Royal Prussia]], the western part of the Teutonic Order's state which became part of Poland in 1466. Königsberg was not part of Royal/Polish Prussia. Again a POVish edit.

:Some other changes were just minor sentence constructions, grammatically wrong (Stadtstheater) or unsourced. I'm pretty sure the Königsberg garrison wasn't "quartered" and [[Christian Ludwig von Kalckstein]] wasn't assassinated but sentenced to death by a Prussian court.

:If you think some of your changes should be adopted, please seek [[WP:Consensus]] at the relevant talk page. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 13:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

== Ethnicity of Spätaussiedler ==

Look, English wikipedia very clearly says that they could be of any ethnicity, not just ethnic Germans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_return#Germany

Quote from the "Right of return" article, "Germany" section: "German law allows (1) persons descending from German nationals '''OF ANY ETHNICITY''' or (2) persons of ethnic German descent and living in countries of the former Warsaw Pact (as well as Yugoslavia) the right to "return" to Germany and ("re")claim German citizenship."

Also, Spätaussiedler do not have to be Reichsdeutsche but also Volksdeutsche (who were not German citizens before WW2, but lived for example in Volhynia).

[[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 16:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

: Here is Deutsche Welle article about Spätaussiedler which clearly mentions that many of them were ethnic Poles or with mixed Polish-German identity:
: https://www.dw.com/pl/emigracja-z-polski-do-niemiec-liczna-i-prawie-niewidoczna/a-16181647 [[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 16:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
: Actually the article mentions Czesław Gołębiewski and [[Lukas Podolski]] as examples of ethnic Polish Spätaussiedler (not family members, but Spätaussiedler - they could be ethnic Poles or other ethnic Slavs as well). I will remove those edits by sock. [[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska#top|talk]]) 17:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

== Question about Spätaussiedler ==

Immigrants from pre-war Polish Silesia (East Upper Silesia) were also counted as Spätaussiedler or not?

Because there were around 2 million Einhemische Silesians there in 1950: https://i.imgur.com/HmJiihn.png

Source (Tabelle 7): https://ulis-buecherecke.ch/pdf_neben_dem_krieg/schlesien_und_die_schlesier.pdf

Wojewodschaft Kattowitz included small part of West Upper Silesia with over 300,000 Autochthons, but the remaining 2 million were Einhemische Silesians from East Upper Silesia, which had been part of Poland already before 1939. Many East Upper Silesians also emigrated to Germany for economical reasons.

If they were counted as Spätaussiedler, then you cannot equate Spätaussiedler with "autochthons of Regained Lands".

In such case I suggest we should remove the statement about the number of Spätaussiedler because it has nothing to do with the number of "autochthons of Regained Lands", as Spätaussiedler could be recruited also from other groups (Volksdeutsche in all regions of Poland, even Lublin etc., Silesians in East Upper Silesia which is not part of "Regained Lands", etc.).

I removed that statement from those two articles, but I added it to the article about Right of return: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_return#Germany

And I added "See also" templates linking to Right of return page to those two Ostgebiete-related articles.

[[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 10:07, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

==[[Template:Did you know nominations/Ontario (steamboat)]]==
Please see note on your DYK review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
: I fixed it. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 -->

==Charles Fryatt==
Hi, can you provide an English translation of the quote you added to the reference? I think it would benefit those readers who don't speak German. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 03:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

== Gdansk vote ==

Please respect Gdansk vote-it isn't used for modern locations in Poland or administrative districts.--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 12:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
:{{ping|MyMoloboaccount}}: "''For Gdansk and other locations that share a history between Germany and Poland, the first reference of one name in an article should also include a reference to other names''" These districts obviously share a history, the date of construction of the current houses is completely irrelevant. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 14:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
::Warsaw shares a lot of history with Germany Herkus-are you claiming all locations in Warsaw and its administrative districts should have Germanised names? For instance are you claiming [[]]Wola district should have Germanised name just because [[Wola Massacre]] happened there?--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 14:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
::::Please try to keep this discussion factual. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 14:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
:::::Sorry,are you saying Wola Massacre didn't happen? Please clarify. I believe you are seriously misrepresenting the vote-it isn't used for descriptions of modern locations but for historical part of the articles. Since all of Poland was once under German occupation in WW2 your interpretation would mean every Polish location should have a Germanised name-which is obviously wrong and absurd.--[[User:MyMoloboaccount|MyMoloboaccount]] ([[User talk:MyMoloboaccount|talk]]) 14:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

==Masurian People's Party==
Hello. Just a heads up: You introduced a contradictory claim in this article that an MVP candidate received around a third of the vote in a constituency, but the winning Conservative Party candidate received 73% of the vote. Cheers, [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 18:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

==Notable Masurians==

Hi, [[Hieronim Malecki]] moved to Masuria in the 1500s but at that time a lot of Poles/Masovians were moving to Masuria, so I think he should be added back because he was one of the "founders" of this population, and he was Lutheran. I'll add him back. The ones without articles on English Wikipedia were taken from Polish Wikipedia.<br>[[User:Domen von Wielkopolska|Domen von Wielkopolska]] ([[User talk:Domen von Wielkopolska|talk]]) 12:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

==DYK nomination of Carlshof Institutions==
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Carlshof Institutions]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Carlshof Institutions|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 18:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

== Translation request ==

Hello HerkusMonte, Would you write / translate the article of [[Isabelle de Charrière]] (Q123386) for the NDS Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. [[User:Boss-well63|Boss-well63]] ([[User talk:Boss-well63|talk]]) 13:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=990308186 -->

== Precious anniversary ==
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

== Please see... ==

...[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Otto_von_Bismarck#Deletions this]. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 06:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

{{-}}
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1056563210 -->

== Precious anniversary ==
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 10:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:FDP chairs]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|30px|link=]][[:Template:FDP chairs]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for deletion]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 22#Template:FDP chairs|the entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Gonnym|Gonnym]] ([[User talk:Gonnym|talk]]) 12:09, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

{{collapse top}}
== Before/after 1945... ==

I would perhaps suggest that you refrain form adding stand alone text about "before 1945" (it was Germany) or "after 1945" (expelled Germans) into every Polish town and village article. In some cases, it appears that the new text exceeds what's already written in these small stub articles, thus clearly creating issues of undue weight and balance. Also, if you want to expand on the history of a particular place, then please start at the beginning, as most of those areas were part of the Piast Poland and were inhabited by the Slavs, before German colonization. 1945 is not the "start of history", for those places. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 14:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

:[[User:E-960|E-960]], If you would take a closer look to my edits you would realize I only reverted a sockpuppet. The single sentence "the area was part of Germany before 1945" was added by the bot who created these articles (e.g. [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=%C5%BBychlikowo&diff=279102958&oldid=275997731], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Ganitajny&diff=277266423&oldid=273639573], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Merguny&diff=277301398&oldid=273640137]). I restored longstanding versions of these articles. Could you please explain why you deleted clearly sourced content ([https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Budzieszewice&diff=1073202960&oldid=1064466964], [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Kobylnik,_Z%C5%82ot%C3%B3w_County&diff=1073001810&oldid=1067266658]) [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte#top|talk]]) 16:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
::Yes, upon further review I did notice that a bot used a template to generate these stub articles for Polish towns and villages. However, I'm not sure if a person set the template up and the bot did the rest, as I'm not familiar with the technical aspect of this. However, I'm completely taken aback by the fact that out of ALL the history, the only reference made was that "prior to 1945 it was Germany" (since forever???). This is clearly POV-ish, and cherry-picked. I think a bot should be used to remove these blurb statements, or include a bit more detail to summarize the history of the region(s) from the start. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 18:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
:::It's funny how you're calling it "POV" and "cherry-picked", while you're deleting facts about the changing of borders in 1945 and deleting sourced German place names, but at the same time you're adding the information - totally standing-alone - , that this areas belonged to Poland 1000 years ago (!)... A time where the most of this villages WASN'T even founded! lol.. Just to proof the claim of the ancient Piast/Polish grounds... THIS is POV... It's so obvious what your intention is. --[[User:Jonny84|Jonny84]] ([[User talk:Jonny84|talk]]) 04:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
::::[[User:Jonny84|Jonny84]], stop casting [[WP:ASPERSIONS]] and imply what my "intentions" are. When someone adds a statement to a sort stub article and only says "before 1945 it was germany" and nothing else... it's POV. Pomerania was Polish, an independent duchy, Polish, Danish, Swedish, Prussian, German and again Polish. So, it was more Polish than "German" when looking at the full context. When someone adds an out of context statement which say that it was germany before 1945... what does that suggest, that it was such since the last [[ice age]]??? Funny, how you don't notice this imbalance in the text, yet throw around grievances. I hate to break it to you, but Germany is not the only country that lost much territory, yet you don't see such POV-ish additions in other country articles": "it was Sweden before 1809", or "it was Poland before 1945", or "it was Great Britain before 1921". --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 07:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

[[File:Gerson Without land.jpg|thumb|Pomeranians driven out by the Germans in the 11th century, by Wojciech Gerson (1831–1901)]]

:::::[[User:Jonny84|Jonny84]], btw that's non-sense, you ridicule me for adding a reference to Mieszko I saying that ''"this areas belonged to Poland 1000 years ago (!)"'', then you follow that by adding a reference to germanic tribes form like 2000 years ago, who left and just went west. Really, '''just stop with the POV push''', it's clear that you only add to the Poland articles stuff (out of context) related to Germany or germans. Like for example you did not bother to mention that the area also belonged to the Kingdom of Denmark, or that Duchy of Pomerania was a Slavic duchy. Your edits are POV-ish and create undue weight, ignoring anything non-german to the point of grossly distorting history. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 09:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
::::::First of all, I'm not "load up Poland articles with stuff (out of context) related to Germany or germans.", I'm just restoring related informations, you were deleting before.. 2) I'm contributing to articles who are related with Germany and German people in the past.. So there is nothing wrong in that.. If you disagree, then delete the name Lwów from Lviv and everything about Poland and Poles in "Ukraine articles".. I'm sure you wouldn't do that, because this don't fit with your agenda... --[[User:Jonny84|Jonny84]] ([[User talk:Jonny84|talk]]) 22:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
{{outdent}}[[User:Jonny84|Jonny84]], I reverted your edits, stop with the blatant POV push and falsehoods. For one in the 12th century it was the Holy Roman Empire, not the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. At that time the "empire" was still rather multi-ethnic. Also, stop adding irrelevant and misleading information about the Polish-Soviet war and Polish-Ukrainian war, by writing clearly misleading and inaccurate information such as this: ''"...in 1945 the German inhabitants were expelled, and Polish population brought in from the Soviet Western Ukraine and Belarus, where Poles had to leave following the previous aggressions in wars against Ukraine and Soviet Russia in the 1920s."'' Your edits are disruptive and clearly bias, what you added is simply a distortion of facts. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960|talk]]) 12:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
:This was a part of ''Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation'' (name was used since 15th century and was it latest name) till 18th century, till the End of the Empire... So were is nothing wrong in the name.. There is no reason to use just the name from 12 century. We also don't use words like Polacks today, because it was used in 18th century. I know you are trying to act like a fool.. But in reality you know exactly, that you are tring to push polish nationalist claims in all this articles, especially by trying to delete everything related with/about Germans.. since years (so this is no coincidence).. This is REAL POV, learn to deal with it and acknowledge it. I know your (real) intentions, don't make me a fool. --[[User:Jonny84|Jonny84]] ([[User talk:Jonny84|talk]]) 15:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
::Citation ''"So, it was more Polish than "German" when looking at the full context."'' This couldn't be more POVish... 9 centuries is less? So you are claiming something like Maria Theresia of Habsburg wasn't a German Emperor and every Roman-"German" Emperor else? So what did they were else? Polish? Roman? Italian? Marsian? --[[User:Jonny84|Jonny84]] ([[User talk:Jonny84|talk]]) 15:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{collapse bottom}}

== A standard message to notify about an administrative ruling in effect. ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}} - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 14:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

:I’m replying to your message left here -->[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GizzyCatBella&diff=prev&oldid=1073411630]. You have shown interest in Central/ [[Eastern Europe]], particularly the [[World War II|WW2]] [[History of Poland (1939–1945)|history of Poland]] (eg. [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Budzieszewice&diff=prev&oldid=1064466964&diffmode=source]). Due to past disruption in this subject area, an additional strict set of rules named discretionary sanctions is in effect hence the above notice. Consider yourself notified. Thank you. - <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:#40">'''GizzyCatBella'''</span>]][[User talk:GizzyCatBella|<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:80%">🍁</span>]]</span></small> 17:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 -->

Revision as of 13:45, 26 May 2023