Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj sahu z: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 12: Line 12:
====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
I didn't add fully the same text. I add some part of the text which is not against the guidelines of Wikipedia. But he reverts that without any reason. Still, I am okay with that there will be some problems but he again and again reverted most of the edits I did on Wikipedia without any explanation and said "Block evading sock" again and again.
I didn't add fully the same text. I add some part of the text which is not against the guidelines of Wikipedia. But he reverts that without any reason. Still, I am okay with that there will be some problems but he again and again reverted most of the edits I did on Wikipedia without any explanation and said "Block evading sock" again and again.

The problem of edit which is mentioned by complaining user, I add only that part which is having reliable reference and the text which follows Wikipedia editing guidelines.

If I did some mistake, any user can fix it with explanation but reverting all my contribution to Wikipedia is against the User Right


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 15:34, 27 May 2023

Raj sahu z

Raj sahu z (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj sahu z/Archive.


26 May 2023

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Block evasion. Blocked account adds this, and new account adds the same text. Also see ANI thread MrOllie (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

I didn't add fully the same text. I add some part of the text which is not against the guidelines of Wikipedia. But he reverts that without any reason. Still, I am okay with that there will be some problems but he again and again reverted most of the edits I did on Wikipedia without any explanation and said "Block evading sock" again and again.

The problem of edit which is mentioned by complaining user, I add only that part which is having reliable reference and the text which follows Wikipedia editing guidelines.

If I did some mistake, any user can fix it with explanation but reverting all my contribution to Wikipedia is against the User Right

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments