Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj sahu z: Difference between revisions
Courcelles (talk | contribs) →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: Likely. (using responseHelper) |
Courcelles (talk | contribs) Marking request as checked (using spihelper.js) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===26 May 2023=== |
===26 May 2023=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|checked}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1=Bruhh is here|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
{{sock list|1=Bruhh is here|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
Revision as of 15:25, 30 May 2023
Raj sahu z
Raj sahu z (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Raj sahu z/Archive.
26 May 2023
– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Bruhh is here (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Block evasion. Blocked account adds this, and new account adds the same text. Also see ANI thread MrOllie (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Comments by other users
I didn't add fully the same text. I add some part of the text which is not against the guidelines of Wikipedia. But he reverts that without any reason. Still, I am okay with that there will be some problems but he again and again reverted most of the edits I did on Wikipedia without any explanation and said "Block evading sock" again and again.
Regarding the problem of the edit which is mentioned by the complaining user, I add only the part which is having reliable references and the text which follows Wikipedia editing guidelines.
If I did some mistake, any user can fix it with an explanation but reverting all my contributions to Wikipedia is against the User Right Bruhh is here (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Likely Pretty darned likely, along with sleeper Usualwithunusual... given both accounts first action was to thank the master, I'd call this behaviorally proven. Courcelles (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
