User talk:Kalem014: Difference between revisions
→June 2023: Reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 04:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 04:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Hi @[[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]]. Allow me to clarify. Prior to making the revision that you have now reverted twice without providing a valid explanation, I first engaged in discussion in collaboration with multiple editors on the Talk page under "Suggestions for revising the lead" to bring the lead closer to Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. As you can see on the Talk page, there is a lot of concern around the objectivity of this particular content. I reverted your reversion only once, because a valid explanation was not given |
:Hi @[[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]]. Allow me to clarify. Prior to making the revision that you have now reverted twice without providing a valid explanation, I first engaged in discussion in collaboration with multiple editors on the Talk page under "Suggestions for revising the lead" to bring the lead closer to Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. As you can see on the Talk page, there is a lot of concern around the objectivity of this particular content. I reverted your reversion only once, because a valid explanation was not given (please see WP:REVEXP). I invite you again to the above-mentioned Talk page section where this was discussed to express your concerns. I look forward to discussing your concerns there with you and others. Thanks! [[User:Kalem014|Kalem014]] ([[User talk:Kalem014#top|talk]]) 04:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:30, 7 June 2023
June 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hemiauchenia (talk) 04:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Hemiauchenia. Allow me to clarify. Prior to making the revision that you have now reverted twice without providing a valid explanation, I first engaged in discussion in collaboration with multiple editors on the Talk page under "Suggestions for revising the lead" to bring the lead closer to Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. As you can see on the Talk page, there is a lot of concern around the objectivity of this particular content. I reverted your reversion only once, because a valid explanation was not given (please see WP:REVEXP). I invite you again to the above-mentioned Talk page section where this was discussed to express your concerns. I look forward to discussing your concerns there with you and others. Thanks! Kalem014 (talk) 04:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)