User talk:131.251.254.2

Posting on AN/I

Re your recent post on AN/I, it is important to place the notice on the user's talk page, or your complaint will just get wiped away. You can use {{subst:ANI-notice}} to do that. _signed, Willondon (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I had already placed the required notice, two minutes after I posted to the noticeboard. 131.251.254.2 (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

131.251.254.2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is completely insane. You've blocked my IP address for three months, when I was the one getting randomly attacked for making a handful of minor edits which made articles more concise, clearer, more accurate and generally better? Replacing text like "It is notable for being the prototype example" with "It is the prototype example" is not controversial. It is a simple, obvious improvement. Why are you blocking me for such edits? 131.251.254.2 (talk) 16:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is completely insane. You've blocked my IP address for '''three months''', when I was the one getting randomly attacked for making a handful of minor edits which made articles more concise, clearer, more accurate and generally better? Replacing text like "It is notable for being the prototype example" with "It is the prototype example" is not controversial. It is a simple, ''obvious'' improvement. Why are you blocking me for such edits? [[Special:Contributions/131.251.254.2|131.251.254.2]] ([[User talk:131.251.254.2#top|talk]]) 16:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is completely insane. You've blocked my IP address for '''three months''', when I was the one getting randomly attacked for making a handful of minor edits which made articles more concise, clearer, more accurate and generally better? Replacing text like "It is notable for being the prototype example" with "It is the prototype example" is not controversial. It is a simple, ''obvious'' improvement. Why are you blocking me for such edits? [[Special:Contributions/131.251.254.2|131.251.254.2]] ([[User talk:131.251.254.2#top|talk]]) 16:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is completely insane. You've blocked my IP address for '''three months''', when I was the one getting randomly attacked for making a handful of minor edits which made articles more concise, clearer, more accurate and generally better? Replacing text like "It is notable for being the prototype example" with "It is the prototype example" is not controversial. It is a simple, ''obvious'' improvement. Why are you blocking me for such edits? [[Special:Contributions/131.251.254.2|131.251.254.2]] ([[User talk:131.251.254.2#top|talk]]) 16:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}