Jump to content

Talk:Happiness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
This article is a class Start because it doesn't even address the topic in a "daily life" sense
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=60|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=60|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Society|class=B}}
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Society|class=Start}}
{{FailedGA|11:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)|topic=Culture, sociology and psychology|page=1}}
{{FailedGA|11:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)|topic=Culture, sociology and psychology|page=1}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=B|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=Start|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=high|class=B|ethics=yes}}
{{WikiProject Philosophy|class=Start|importance=high|ethics=yes}}
{{WP1.0|v0.7=pass|class=B|category=Everydaylife|VA=yes}}
{{WP1.0|v0.7=pass|class=Start|category=Everydaylife|VA=yes}}
}}
}}
{{Press
{{Press

Revision as of 21:38, 8 June 2023

Template:Vital article

This article needs a MAJOR revamp.

When people say "The most moral action is the one that maximizes happiness" they don't literally mean the emotion of being happy. Typically, they really mean something a bit more subtle than that, something which could partially be described as "freedom to do what you want to do". This article however, assumes that it does indeed mean the emotion of happiness, with is just totally not right. I'd say rewrite this article to describe the emotion rather than the strange combination of emotion and philosophy that it is right now. Tux9001 (talk) 20:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you're talking about the moral philosophy theory of Utilitarianism with your "people say". That is how the article introduces the connection of moral action to happiness. The way Jeremy Bentham wrote about this topic, he was definitely referring to the emotion of being happy. When John Stuart Mill refined the idea, he recognised different kinds of contentment or satisfaction, so he was still talking about emotions, but more refined/ nuanced ones. Although he had a lot to say about the liberty being a good, he didn't describe the happiness utilitarianism aims for as "freedom to do what you want to do". Your proposal contradicts what's cited and so seems "just totally not right". The changes you want would introduce vagueness where there is clarity and misrepresent the sources the article is based on. MartinPoulter (talk) 11:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Spring 2023

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 April 2023 and 17 July 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Itsallinthedetails (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Itsallinthedetails (talk) 18:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... about the lead

I'm experiencing the most intense feeling of writer's block since a long while. Does anybody here have any ideas about expanding the lead? CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 21:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]