Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfriend (0th nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*How did this happen?? I studied this Vfd and I got that an article got put back on Vfd after a while of being kept. '''No vote''' right now, this is just a question. [[User:Georgia guy|Georgia guy]] 00:01, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
*How did this happen?? I studied this Vfd and I got that an article got put back on Vfd after a while of being kept. '''No vote''' right now, this is just a question. [[User:Georgia guy|Georgia guy]] 00:01, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
||
*This has already been [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Girlfriend&oldid=11573743 voted on]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Boyfriend&oldid=11573793 So has boyfriend]. Both discussions have been blanked; I'm not sure of the method to fix this. I have also completed the incompletely done VFD nomination. --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] ([[User talk:SPUI|talk]]) 01:43, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
*This has already been [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Girlfriend&oldid=11573743 voted on]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Boyfriend&oldid=11573793 So has boyfriend]. Both discussions have been blanked; I'm not sure of the method to fix this. I have also completed the incompletely done VFD nomination. --[[User:SPUI|SPUI]] ([[User talk:SPUI|talk]]) 01:43, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) |
||
**(reply to message above}: there is no sense salvaging a VfD list from a previous VfD iteration for the same article because it would be superfluous. And besides, people will think that VfD votes from 2 iterations would be part of 1. |
|||
Revision as of 02:30, 28 March 2005
Girlfriend and Boyfriend
This article referrs to the female equivilant of a non-marital romantic spouse; this calls for a request of business: also, the same VfD votes for this article apply to the boyfriend article --TheSamurai 14:54, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect and merge to non-marital romantic spouse; same with boyfriend. --TheSamurai 14:59, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- How did this happen?? I studied this Vfd and I got that an article got put back on Vfd after a while of being kept. No vote right now, this is just a question. Georgia guy 00:01, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- This has already been voted on. So has boyfriend. Both discussions have been blanked; I'm not sure of the method to fix this. I have also completed the incompletely done VFD nomination. --SPUI (talk) 01:43, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- (reply to message above}: there is no sense salvaging a VfD list from a previous VfD iteration for the same article because it would be superfluous. And besides, people will think that VfD votes from 2 iterations would be part of 1.