Jump to content

Talk:Roxham Road: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic
Line 30: Line 30:


:I have been planning to do that here; the article you're thinking of is linked multiply from this one: [[Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement]], which has already been updated. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
:I have been planning to do that here; the article you're thinking of is linked multiply from this one: [[Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement]], which has already been updated. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 03:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

== Local Support section biased ==

This section of the article is written with a very slanted perspective of the illegal immigration occurring over Roxham Road, citing opinion pieces and making assumptions about “local support” while only providing narrow sources. If this section is to exist, I would like a revision to include cited surveys or polls regarding the affect of these illegal immigrants and to have the biased inputs of editors who support or disagree with the illegal immigration updated accordingly. [[User:Shotstopper33|Shotstopper33]] ([[User talk:Shotstopper33|talk]]) 00:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:58, 17 June 2023

WikiProject iconNew York (state) B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: Quebec B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
WikiProject iconCanada Roads: Quebec B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in Canadian provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Topics:
Taskforce icon
Quebec
Note icon
This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, add |needs-kml=no to the Canada Roads banner.

Lisée and the fence

I am Lisée and I strongly object to the mischaracterisation of my position in this wikipedia entry. As seen in this accurate report https://globalnews.ca/news/4168099/pq-leader-jean-francois-lisee-wants-to-build-a-fence-near-quebec-new-york-border/ I said that, once asylum seekers will be allowed to come through regular border points, we should put a fence and a sign to tell would-be seekers to go the the regular crossing, which would be more respectful for all. the author of the wiki entry erred in omitting this essential fact. please correct and come back to me at jflisee@gmail.com

Parti Quebecois (PQ) Leader Jean-François Lisée said he wants a fence built near a Quebec-New York border crossing that is popular with asylum seekers.

Lisee said the fence should go up at Roxham Road in Hemmingford, near the Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle crossing. He told reporters in Quebec City on Wednesday that Canada should rip up the safe third-party agreement and asylum seekers should be directed to legal border crossings.

When asked who would pay for the fence, Lisee joked, “the Mexicans.” He later said that the barrier he was proposing would not be a Trump-like wall. It could be just a cedar hedge. “We cannot close Roxham Road unless and until [asylum seekers] have the ability to come through the regular postings. That’s what we’ve been asking for for a year. Amnesty International is [also] asking that,” Lisée said. Jflisee (talk) 05:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the source was RCI, so blame them for the actual omission—as the primary contributor to the article, I only wrote what the source said. But thanks for the clarification, and I will add the additional material in a day or so (I hope). Daniel Case (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is way too long

There's a lot of useful information here but it's spread across an article that few will take the time to read entirely. See WP:LENGTH. Areas for judicious pruning include:

Cornellier (talk) 16:24, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update to reflect new agreement by U.S+Canada

With the latest agreement, thats should be added to the pages, and(if this article actually exists) put a link i see also to a article about the U.S Canada border(or illegal crossing of said border) 24.13.4.148 (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been planning to do that here; the article you're thinking of is linked multiply from this one: Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement, which has already been updated. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Local Support section biased

This section of the article is written with a very slanted perspective of the illegal immigration occurring over Roxham Road, citing opinion pieces and making assumptions about “local support” while only providing narrow sources. If this section is to exist, I would like a revision to include cited surveys or polls regarding the affect of these illegal immigrants and to have the biased inputs of editors who support or disagree with the illegal immigration updated accordingly. Shotstopper33 (talk) 00:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]