Jump to content

Talk:Laser-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Viriale (talk | contribs)
Figure where?: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 5: Line 5:
Interesting, informative, BUT: the article seems to be nothing else but a condensed scientific paper. The style doesn't suit wikipedias criteria for clearity. Examples: "he laser-based ARPES undoubtedly is an ideal candidate ..." or "In addition, the lower costs for operating and higher photon flux make laser-based ARPES easier to be handled".
Interesting, informative, BUT: the article seems to be nothing else but a condensed scientific paper. The style doesn't suit wikipedias criteria for clearity. Examples: "he laser-based ARPES undoubtedly is an ideal candidate ..." or "In addition, the lower costs for operating and higher photon flux make laser-based ARPES easier to be handled".
This is a wikipedian article, not a scientific funding request for this kind of ARPES. --[[Special:Contributions/77.191.238.254|77.191.238.254]] ([[User talk:77.191.238.254|talk]]) 15:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
This is a wikipedian article, not a scientific funding request for this kind of ARPES. --[[Special:Contributions/77.191.238.254|77.191.238.254]] ([[User talk:77.191.238.254|talk]]) 15:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

== Figure where? ==

The article seems a copy paste more than an original article, it refers to a figure 1 which is totally missing and seems something that you would find in an article. [[User:Viriale|Viriale]] ([[User talk:Viriale|talk]]) 20:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:38, 21 June 2023

WikiProject iconSpectroscopy (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spectroscopy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Neutrality?

Interesting, informative, BUT: the article seems to be nothing else but a condensed scientific paper. The style doesn't suit wikipedias criteria for clearity. Examples: "he laser-based ARPES undoubtedly is an ideal candidate ..." or "In addition, the lower costs for operating and higher photon flux make laser-based ARPES easier to be handled". This is a wikipedian article, not a scientific funding request for this kind of ARPES. --77.191.238.254 (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Figure where?

The article seems a copy paste more than an original article, it refers to a figure 1 which is totally missing and seems something that you would find in an article. Viriale (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]