Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yohan Lainesse: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.[7] |
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.[7] |
||
Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. |
Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. |
||
People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as being notable only for a single event, or such as those listed in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. |
People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as being notable only for a single event, or such as those listed in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.(depth of coverage by sources is substantial) |
||
[[User:ExNhilo87|ExNhilo87]] ([[User talk:ExNhilo87|talk]]) 22:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC) |
[[User:ExNhilo87|ExNhilo87]] ([[User talk:ExNhilo87|talk]]) 22:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:30, 23 June 2023
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yohan Lainesse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:NMMA. Only one win in the UFC currently over someone who was only a handful bouts into their career and went 0-3 in the UFC. Currently the #216 WW in the world, highest ever was #119, nowhere close to even the top 25 HeinzMaster (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Canada. HeinzMaster (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Passes WP:TOOSOON ans WP:MMABIO, the only thing that really matters for MMA biography pages. It requires at least 3 fight under top promotion (UFC) which subject has and he will continue to compete there. Unfortunately if this one is invalid then there are several others that need to be deleted as well. ExNhilo87 (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also read through WP:NMMA it is just a redirect, not only does it not mention MMA in it at all. I used the find on page function and most of the "MMA" are part of the word su"mma"ries.. so yeah kinda confused about that one.. ExNhilo87 (talk) 22:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- MMA notability, also known as WP:MMANOT, is an essay to give some guidance on points to consider when discussing the notability of the subjects of mixed martial arts (MMA) articles. Which article also passes. ExNhilo87 (talk) 22:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Article also passes basic guidelines for Wikipedia:Notability (people) People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6](article subject has multiple primary references)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.[7] Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as being notable only for a single event, or such as those listed in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.(depth of coverage by sources is substantial) ExNhilo87 (talk) 22:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)