Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube Spammer Purge: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Indefensible (talk | contribs) delete |
del |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="font-family:'Tahoma'; color:#005494">[[User:Giraffer|Giraffer]] <sup>([[User talk:Giraffer|talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Giraffer|contribs]])</sup></span> 23:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="font-family:'Tahoma'; color:#005494">[[User:Giraffer|Giraffer]] <sup>([[User talk:Giraffer|talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Giraffer|contribs]])</sup></span> 23:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' - subject does not meet notability requirements - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 23:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - subject does not meet notability requirements - [[User:Indefensible|Indefensible]] ([[User talk:Indefensible|talk]]) 23:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - I can find no significant coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. The best attestation to notability is a passing mention in The Verge which falls well short of what is needed. Note that [[WP:A7|A7]] specifically excludes software which is why the A7 was declined. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 00:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:27, 27 June 2023
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- YouTube Spammer Purge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was declined for CSD A7 by Whpq (I thought it qualified under web content but I appear to be mistaken) but I still think it is not notable. Of the existing references, one only briefly mentions the subject, two are user-generated content, and one is a walkthrough of using the software. Plus I can't seem to find any reliable in-depth coverage about the topic. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 23:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 23:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - subject does not meet notability requirements - Indefensible (talk) 23:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources. The best attestation to notability is a passing mention in The Verge which falls well short of what is needed. Note that A7 specifically excludes software which is why the A7 was declined. -- Whpq (talk) 00:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)