Talk:Hal Foster (art critic): Difference between revisions
Tag with {{WPBiography}} for WP1.0 assessments/Living persons bio |
Staxringold (talk | contribs) m Assessed as "start" for WPBiography via script |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=| |
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=start|priority=Low}} |
||
Revision as of 00:13, 20 March 2007
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
I'd say that if one puts Greenberg, Fried, Krauss and Foster into the same 'lineage,' it is also necessary to mention the serious disagreements between them - or at least, in this case, between Foster and the others. Also, I don't believe that Habermas, Frampton, Baudrillard, et al., can all be accurately described as being 'pro-resistance' and 'anti-reaction' on the topic of postmodernism, even with the qualifier 'disparate' -- that is just Foster's formulation. For instance, I would say Habermas would be simply pro-modern, anti-postmodern. Blima3000 12:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
The current article, in my view, somewhat overstates the centrality of postmodernism as a concept for Foster. I would propose editing it to give a bit of a longer list of the different concepts that he uses - which I also volunteer myself to do, shortly... Blima3000 13:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)