Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Updating requested pagemoves list
DJskywrd (talk | contribs)
123 edits
Tags: Reverted Reply
Line 8: Line 8:
===July 7, 2023===
===July 7, 2023===
* ''([[Talk:The Beekeeper (upcoming film)#Requested move 7 July 2023|Discuss]])'' – '''[[:The Beekeeper (upcoming film)]] → [[The Beekeeper (2024 film)]]''' – The film now has a release date. [[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:761F:4600:BCF2:2881:689D:4525|2607:FEA8:761F:4600:BCF2:2881:689D:4525]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:761F:4600:BCF2:2881:689D:4525|talk]]) 21:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
* ''([[Talk:The Beekeeper (upcoming film)#Requested move 7 July 2023|Discuss]])'' – '''[[:The Beekeeper (upcoming film)]] → [[The Beekeeper (2024 film)]]''' – The film now has a release date. [[Special:Contributions/2607:FEA8:761F:4600:BCF2:2881:689D:4525|2607:FEA8:761F:4600:BCF2:2881:689D:4525]] ([[User talk:2607:FEA8:761F:4600:BCF2:2881:689D:4525|talk]]) 21:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
*:I'll go ahead and do this for you. I feel there's no need for discussion on this. [[User:DJskywrd|DJskywrd]] ([[User talk:DJskywrd|talk]]) 23:00, 7 July 2023 (UTC)


* ''([[Talk:Avinash#Requested move 7 July 2023|Discuss]])'' – '''[[:Avinash]] → {{no redirect|Avinash Yelandur}}''' – [[WP:NOPT]]. [[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 21:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
* ''([[Talk:Avinash#Requested move 7 July 2023|Discuss]])'' – '''[[:Avinash]] → {{no redirect|Avinash Yelandur}}''' – [[WP:NOPT]]. [[User:Jax 0677|Jax 0677]] ([[User talk:Jax 0677|talk]]) 21:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:00, 7 July 2023

Shortcuts
This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 59 discussions have been relisted.

July 7, 2023

References

  1. ^ "TelevisaUnivision presenta sus grandes apuestas para el 2023-2024". Univision (in Spanish). TelevisaUnivision. 16 May 2023. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  2. ^ "TelevisaUnivision Reinforces Its Position as Home of Hispanic America at 2023-24 Upfront Presentation". Univision (Press release). TelevisaUnivision. 16 May 2023. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  3. ^ "Así es 'Veo cómo cantas', el formato de Antena 3 de los creadores de 'Mask singer'". El Español (in Spanish). 20 January 2021. Retrieved 28 February 2021.
Saisønisse (talk) 06:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 06:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Colección SOLO → Espacio SOLO – This article is about a private contemporary art museum in Madrid. The museum is called the Espacio SOLO, which houses the Colleción SOLO. Other articles about private museums defer to the name of the museum (Rubell Museum, Glenstone, Mori Art Museum, etc.) even when the private owners distinguish their collection with another name. This article should be renamed - and edited - to reflect the style for articles about private museums, rather than being named for the museum's collection. I can find no other examples of articles about a private art collection in lieu of the private museum that houses the collection. 19h00s (talk) 02:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 6, 2023

  • (Discuss) – Pan Arab Games → Arab Games – The official name of this event is the Arab Sports Games (الألعاب الرياضية العربية), which is shown on the official logo of the event (see here). This name is typically shortened to Arab Games (الألعاب العربية), as shown by the official website of this year's event which is arabgames2023.dz and has the text "15TH EDITION OF ARAB GAMES" on the home page (there is no mention of "Pan Arab" anywhere in the site). Arab Games has always been the name of this event, see the official website of the 2011 event which was named arabgames2011.qa and refers to the name of the event as Arab Games throughout the website, again with no mention of "Pan Arab". See here for the 2011 logo which also says Arab Games. The name Arab Games is also the WP:COMMONNAME - if you search Google for Arab Games there are far more results than Pan Arab Games, and the name Arab Games is in line with other similar events such as Asian Games and African Games. The event has never been called "Pan Arab Games" in either the English or Arabic language and this is also not the common name. Hence, this page and other associated pages should be moved to Arab Games. Hashim-afc (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Turquoise-fronted amazon → Blue-fronted Amazon – This might be a controversial one. Looking back over some of the discussions over the names of bird (and particularly parrot) articles, some of them have got VERY heated. Not my intention to offend anyone or troll, but as I was editing tonight I decided to do a search on Google Scholar for this species (as something else I came across made me think to look it up). As far as I am concerned, "blue-fronted Amazon" is the vastly, vastly, overwhelmingly accepted name for this birdie. According to Google Scholar - "blue fronted amazon" = 1850 results, while turquoise-fronted amazon = 153 results. As I understand it, the species name was changed by the International Ornithologists' Union a few years ago - but it doesn't really seem to have been taken up. Should this be moved back, per WP:COMMONNAME? Iloveparrots (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Black Hills land claim → Taking of the Black Hills – This is the most common phrase on Google Ngrams among options discussed in the recent move request (result: no consensus), where Theft of the Black Hills was proposed based on WP:COMMONNAME (while overlooking more common phrases). In addition to "taking" being more common here than "theft," it is a legally accepted and neutral term (WP:NPOV) in this context. In United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians (1980), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Congress[a] "effected a taking of tribal property" and that it "had taken the Black Hills without just compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment" (i.e., the Takings Clause). The Supreme Court did not use the terms "theft" or "stolen" and did not hold that the lands must be returned, but rather that the U.S. Government must pay just compensation (as normally required for eminent domain).[b] I objected to the title Theft of the Black Hills because it (1) is less common, (2) is a non-neutral term as applied to an unlawful government taking (as distinct from criminal theft), and (3) is not legally correct[c] terminology.

Notes

  1. ^ For background, the way in which Congress took the Black Hills is explained at Black Hills land claim#"Sell or Starve" and the Act of 1877.
  2. ^ United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U.S. 371 (1980) ("the 1877 Act effected a taking of tribal property, property which had been set aside for the exclusive occupation of the Sioux by the Fort Laranme Treaty of 1868. That taking implied an obligation on the part of the Government to make just compensation to the Sioux Nation, and that obligation, including an award of interest, must now, at last, be paid.")
  3. ^ This is what I said about the legal meaning of "theft": That term has legal meaning: It's a criminal offense. When the government takes something (with or without valid legal claim) relevant terms include a "taking" (5th Amendment) or "seizure" (4th Amendment). There is not ordinarily any crime for a government taking, even if it is held to be unlawful. Indeed, what the Supreme Court held was that this was a "taking" of property without just compensation. (As such, the Court held that the United States must pay just compensation for the taking, not that the taking was void to effect a transfer of ownership — as would be the case for stolen property.) I also listed some examples of notable cases where SCOTUS has held government takings illegal.

{{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 03:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Discuss) – Nothing Can Stop My Love → Des mots qui sonnent (song) – Following 15 full years of having an article about Céline Dion's hit single "Des mots qui sonnent", a couple of years ago it suddenly got turned into a redirect to "Nothing Can Stop My Love" — but the problem is that this is deeply misrepresentative. For one thing, "Nothing Can Stop My Love" isn't even attempting any sort of notability claim at all in its own right, and Angela Clemmons doesn't even have an article about her as a person — literally the only discernible notability claim it has at all is the fact that Aldo Nova later handed his melody over to Luc Plamondon to write a completely different set of lyrics for Céline Dion. "Des mots qui sonnent" isn't "a French-language version" of "Nothing Can Stop My Love", it's a completely different song that just happens to share the same melody — "Nothing Can Stop My Love" is about exactly what the title says, while "Des mots qui sonnent" is literally about Céline Dion asking Luc Plamondon to write her a hit song. Like, I'm not even kidding, it's really, truly "hey songwriter, write me a song, write me a song like Sting, write me a song like Michael Jackson, write me a song that'll go top ten". It's just not in any sense the same song just because it has the same melody. But "Des mots qui sonnent" was a significant chart hit in its own right (which even actually did go top ten, very meta!), while "Nothing Can Stop My Love" had no discernible notability whatsoever except as a footnote to "Des mots qui sonnent" — which means the primary topic, and hence the proper title of the article, is "Des mots qui sonnent". The fact that "Nothing Can STop My Love" technically came first isn't as important as the fact that "Des mots qui sonnent" was the thing that actually attained notability under WP:SONGS. Bearcat (talk) 01:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 5, 2023

  • (Discuss) – Kerosene tax → Aviation fuel taxation in the European Union – I previously moved the article to "Jet fuel taxation in the European Union", saying "This [kerosene tax] is not an official name, or a WP:COMMONNAME in English". Nederlandse Leeuw (talk · contribs) requested its move back, saying "'Jet fuel' is American English. All official publications about it from EU institutions and in EU member states call it "kerosene", so per WP:COMMONNAME, that is what it should remain. Mover incorrectly asserted it is "not an official name"; one can read it in all WP:RS provided." English is not Nederlandse Leeuw's first language. "Jet fuel" is perfectly good British English as well as American English. This article concerns the European Union, and there is no such thing as European English. Aviation jet fuel is rarely referred to as "kerosene" in English. "Kerosene" is used more broadly to refer to the hydrocarbon, and sometimes to rocket fuel. In aviation, "kerosene" is rarely used. "Jet fuel" is often used, but it would typically be referred to specifically as Jet-A or Jet-A1. Regarding aviation fuel tax, "kerosene tax" is not the WP:COMMONNAME. The phrase "kerosene tax" is a literal translation from other languages such as Dutch ("kerosinetaks") or German ("Kerosinsteuer") (the English article was originally translated from the German article), but it is not common English. EU documents in English do not call it the "kerosene tax". Energy Taxation Directive 2003/96/EG does not use the phrase "kerosene tax", but does use the phrase "jet fuel". Google gives fewer than 10,000 results for "kerosene tax", versus 85,000 results for "jet fuel tax", as well as over 20,000 results for "tax on jet fuel" versus 16,000 results for "tax on kerosene". I propose the article should be renamed "Aviation fuel taxation in the European Union". There are two reasons for this. Firstly, the scope of the article is about both current and proposed aviation fuel taxes. Secondly, calling it a tax on kerosene or jet fuel is misleading. It is not a tax on all kerosene/jet fuel, only that used in commercial aviation. Furthermore, it is not a tax on just kerosene in commercial aviation, but on all fuel in commercial aviation. The current and proposed taxes concern commercial aviation versus "private pleasure-flying", regardless of whether an aeroplane has jet engines or piston engines. Jet fuel used in "private pleasure-flying" is already taxed, and avgas used in commercial aviation is tax-exempt. The tax is about commercial versus private aviation, not jet fuel versus avgas. cagliost (talk) 11:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Ma'ayan Harod → Ain Jalut – Per clear WP:COMMONNAME as evidenced by the no-contest results on Ngrams and long-term scholarly prominence (787 hits on Google Scholar for "Ain Jalut" / 846 hits on Google Scholar for "Ayn Jalut"), largely in relation to the extremely significant 1260 Battle of Ain Jalut at the locale. "Ain Jalut" is a name of legendary renown that continues to echo across history and appear in the history books as the spot where the Mamluks turned back the tide of the Mongol advance in the Middle East. The current page title, "Ma'ayan Harod", is just a transliterated foreign language-term created as part of a 20th-century rebranding exercise that, by contrast, has little to no presence in English language sources, with just 19 hits on Google Scholar, several of which are not English language sources, leaving maybe a dozen mentions that check out. As the page itself also states, serious archaeologists, such as Israel Finkelstein, actually reject the association between Ain Jalut and the aspirational Biblical association with Herod, so it is a clear WP:COMMONNAME versus an uncommon and contested name. Between the two spellings of Ain/Ayn Jalut it is a fairly even toss up, as the Ngrams and Google Scholar evidence shows, but "Ain Jalut" is simpler, more natural spelling and is consistent with the title of the page for the associated battle. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Iskandar323 (talk) 11:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Lion of Babylon (tank) → T-72 tanks in Iraqi service – This article is currently named "Lion of Babylon", which was the name of an Iraqi project to manufacture/assemble T-72s locally. No tanks may ever have come out of this project. However, the article body primarily talks about T-72s that Iraq had simply acquired from other countries. Confusingly, the term "Lion" is still used frequently in the article, suggesting to the reader that these are tanks from the Lion of Babylon project, even though few (if any) of the cited sourced actually refer to these tanks as Lions. I suggest that we rename this page to "T-72 tanks in Iraqi service", as this is what the article is actually about, and introduce a section named "Lion of Babylon project". If we can find sufficient reliable sources, we can then spin that section off into an article specifically about that project. Cortador (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 4, 2023

  • (Discuss) – Oliver Moore (ice hockey) → Oliver Moore – Current page for 'Oliver Moore' is a redirect to a page called 'Oliver J. Moore'. Now, the ice hockey player has a page that garners significantly more views (352 vs 9 daily average since 6/20). Could be a case of recency bias, but also believe the ice hockey player could have the base, non-disambiguated page with a hatnote to the 'Oliver J. Moore' page. Debartolo2917 (talk) 00:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 162 etc. (talk) 16:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/unicredito
Epicamused (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BD2412 T 00:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 3, 2023

  • (Discuss) – Xing Yi Quan → Xingyi quan – Two reasons for this move. First, as a martial arts style, there's no reason for the name to be capitalized. Secondly, accepted convention is to space pinyin according to words, not syllables. It can sometimes be a bit tricky to determine where the word boundaries are since Chinese is an isolating language, but here's some examples of the correct spacing: [6], [7], [8], [9]. Notably, many of the incorrectly spaced sources depart from conventions in other ways, too: [10] and [11] both hyphenate pinyin names, which is unconventional. SilverStar54 (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Imperial Army (Holy Roman Empire) → Imperial Austrian Army (Holy Roman Empire) – The current title is worse than ambiguous, it is positively misleading. "Imperial Army (Holy Roman Empire)" most naturally brings to mind the Reichsarmee, which is normally called the "Imperial Army", not the "Army of the Holy Roman Empire", as in our article. According to Richard Bassett For God and Kaiser: The Imperial Austrian Army, 1619–1918 (Yale University Press, 2015), p. 11, the name Kaiserliche Armee (the basis of the English translation "Imperial Army") was coined in 1619. The name he uses in the title, Imperial Austrian Army, is the most appropriate, with the disambiguator left in place to indicate that this is about the period before 1806. Srnec (talk) 14:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Face 2 Face (Juice Wrld song) → Face 2 Face (song) – This should be moved to this because this is the only song article with the name Face 2 Face. It was previously already moved to this through this move request system, but the move was wrongfully reverted for not using the system, which was not true. I also came here yesterday with this, but I did not reply soon enough, so it was likely deleted for that reason, but this is one of the first requests, so it should work this time. This is an easy case. Please also make sure to edit it to the new name in the templates of the artists after you move the article. 70.113.0.198 (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). UtherSRG (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Ashdod → Ashdod, Israel – * Ashdod (disambiguation) → Ashdod Ashdod should move to the routine geographical disambiguation title of Ashdod, Israel given the substantial confusion in this area between the modern city founded in 1956 and the ancient city of Asdudu/Ashdod/Azotus/Isdud (its current title), as well as the associated but equally distinct ancient port city of Ashdod-Yam. The scope for this confusion is made plain by the voluminous literature for the ancient city under the name of Ashdod that exists prior to 1956, which results after that presumably being split between the ancient and modern entities (and this is before one even considers the hits under alternative names such as Azotus). On Google scholar, unrefined hits for Ashdod reach about 23,300, but fall to 11,000 if you exclude the telltale signs of archaeological papers in the instance, i.e. "tel" and "yam", while you get slightly more than 12,000 hits if you steer the search towards history/archaeology by requiring "tel" to be referenced. This is a strong indication, as one might expect, that at least half of the scholarly literature in relation to the name "Ashdod" is archaeological in nature and about the ancient settlement(s). Both the Ngrams and Scholar evidence make plain that the modern city is by no means the standout WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Ashdod", and thus the base name should be disambiguated. Looking at the current links to this page, it is also plain that a great many are currently incorrectly targeted, such as all the Biblical references, with the intended target being the ancient city. Disambiguation will help resolve this by requiring the sorting of the links between ancient and modern, and by deterring future ambiguous linking. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2, 2023

  • (Discuss) – Crunchyroll LLC → Crunchyroll (entertainment company) – I want the article to be fixed by moving the topic from LLC to an entertainment company so that I can first correct the comma in the initial part, and even though, having requested the move, there has been a confusion in the Google search between Crunchyroll and Funimation, I would like to the situation between the corporation (Funimation) and an entertainment company (Crunchyroll) should be resolved and so many unnecessary disambiguations or redirects created by various users should be deleted. 179.53.57.51 (talk) 22:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.timesnownews.com/india/bullet-train-project-3-river-bridges-built-in-just-1-month-in-gujarat-see-before-after-pics-article-101443362
  2. ^ https://www.telecomitalia.sm/corporate/note-legali-e-privacy/
Epicamused (talk) 09:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 19:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 18:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Famous Players-Lasky → Famous Players–Lasky – The tight connection with a hyphen wrongly suggests something like a Mr. Players-Lasky who is famous. A dash conveys the more correct connection between parallel items, Famous Players and Lasky. Some of the early ads and logos clearly use a separator such as a swung dash that is very distinctly not a hyphen. We recognize that many sources don't care about the grammatical implications of small typographical differences, and are happy to render dashes as hyphens, but it is WP style to not do that, per MOS:NDASH. Dicklyon (talk) 21:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 11:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.punto-informatico.it/da-cselt-a-telecom-italia-lab/
  2. ^ https://www.quotidianopiemontese.it/2014/12/03/torino-si-celebrano-50-anni-di-tilab-ex-cselt-un-pezzo-di-storia-della-ricerca-tecnologica-italia/
  3. ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20010811191658/http://www.cselt.it:80/indexe.htm
  4. ^ https://www.uni-muenster.de/Informatik/u/lammers//EDU/ws03/Landminen/Abgaben/Gruppe4b/jade/doc/links.htm
Epicamused (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 10:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – St. Joseph, Gulf County, Florida → St. Joseph, Florida – Historically, the subject of this article has been the most prominent place named St. Joseph in Florida. Moreover, the current title of the page is an anachronism. While the site of the former town of St. Joseph is currently in Gulf County, the town was in Franklin County when it was settled, and soon after that, Calhoun County was created to give the town its own county. St. Joseph was the county seat of Calhoun County until the town was abandoned. Calhoun County was later expanded northward, and then, long after St. Joseph was abandoned, the southern part of Calhoun County (more or less coterminous with the original boundaries of the county) was separated as Gulf County. This move would return the article to its original title. Donald Albury 00:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 1, 2023

  • (Discuss) – Kim Gu → Kim Koo – As per the Kim Koo Museum and Library, the Kim Koo Foundation, the Kim Koo Forum, and many more. Spellings of his name vary and include Kim Ku (many of his contemporaries, as can be seen in quotes in the article), Kim Gu (modern in South Korea), and Kim Koo (both contemporary and in academia). But when foundations established by his immediate descendants and supported by the South Korean government use this spelling, I think it's a compelling case. These foundations are also notable in both the United States and Korea; the foundation has contributed millions of dollars to institutions abroad and supports a "Kim Koo Professor" at Tufts University. Finally, and maybe most importantly, this article was titled "Kim Koo" before 21 April 2020, when @GeneralPoxter moved it, I think without discussion (sorry for the callout). toobigtokale (talk) 23:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Zeb Vance → Zebulon Baird Vance – Under discussion is the restoration of this article to its former name. The article was moved to Vance's nickname of "Zeb" without prior discussion and based on data from historical newspapers which traditionally shortened names to save space. Zebulon is the name used in his publications, his obituary in the New York Times, on numerous monuments, and in places and institutions named after him. Modern historians refer to him as Zebulan, as does the State of North Carolina which manages his birthplace as an historic site. Rublamb (talk) 22:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Cnut → Canute – A number of moves of this article have been discussed comparatively recently, but this one has not been discussed in the last decade. This remains his WP:COMMONNAME in English, see e.g. King Canute and the tide It is also used by some respectable sources like the Encyclopedia Britannica and the British monarchy website. It is also not what his own people would have called him, which would be "Knut" or "Knutr". PatGallacher (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Harold B. Lee Library → BYU Library – "BYU Library" is more commonly recognizable and natural than "Harold B. Lee Library". It is concise. Additionally, it is more precise; the history section of the page covers the library from time periods when it went by other names, like the Heber J. Grant Library and J. Reuben Clark Library; the term "BYU Library" accurately describes the library from any period of time in its existence. There is also historical precedent for using "BYU Library" as a more concise term. It's used in headlines and other mentions of the library in the Utah Digital Newspapers database going back as far as 1927. Here's an example from 2023 of The Daily Herald using "BYU Library" instead of "Harold B. Lee Library." A book that describes the library's history is entitled Brigham Young University Library Centennial History. Full disclosure: I am employed at the BYU Library as a Wikipedian-in-Residence. Library administration and outreach have been using "BYU Library" instead of "Harold B. Lee Library" because they believe "BYU Library" is more intuitive. I think there are good reasons to change the name of the page that are aligned with Wikipedia's naming conventions. I'm happy to accept whatever the consensus on this ends up being. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 19:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – MaterialWorks 11:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Masala chai → Chai – 1. Move Masala Chai to Chai: The current article titled "Masala Chai" inaccurately represents the prevalent usage and cultural context of chai in India. Chai is the commonly recognized term for the iconic Indian beverage enjoyed by millions of people across the country. The phrase "Masala Chai" is limited primarily to non-Indian communities. By moving the content of Masala Chai to the page titled "Chai," we align with the language and cultural practices of the majority of chai consumers in India. This change will provide an accurate representation of the drink and ensure that the page reflects the terminology most widely used and recognized within its cultural context. 2. Move Chai to Chai_(disambiguation): The current article titled "Chai" serves as a disambiguation page, which does not accurately reflect the prominence and cultural significance of the chai beverage in India. Chai, as mentioned earlier, is the preferred and commonly used term for the Indian drink. By moving the disambiguation content to the page titled "Chai_(disambiguation)," we maintain a comprehensive guide for readers seeking information about various uses and meanings of the term "Chai." This change will ensure that the chai beverage, which holds immense cultural and historical significance, occupies the primary position on Wikipedia, reflecting its importance and widespread usage within Indian culture. I kindly request the Wikipedia community to consider this change in line with the principles of accuracy, cultural relevance, and respect for the preferences of the majority of chai consumers in India. thegodofbigthings (talk) 17:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. SilverLocust (talk) 07:31, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Skull and Bones → Skull and Bones Society – There is no doubt this page is popular, but it's not the obvious primary topic. In the past year, pageviews demonstrate significant sustained interest for the video game also called "Skull and Bones" that is steady at about 1/5 of the views of this page, which is well within the WP:NOPRIMARY margin. Sometimes views for the game exceed the secret society. If we factor in people clicking on the link from here to the game, it becomes even closer. When the game was popular, pageviews for THIS page spiked by about 1000 views/day from all the people who were confused, so we can assume a significant fraction of visitors here are coming to the wrong place. Another telling statistic is that this page started getting about several hundred more views a day ever since the video game's article was made. Interest is likely to remain high whether or not it is cancelled. There is also a very pertinent WP:NATURAL disambiguated title, as shown. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Frostly (talk) 03:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event → Early Toarcian extinction event – This article has, since its earliest days, discussed the smaller PTo-E pulse of the broader Toarcian extinction, and thus titling it the TOAE is less appropriate than titling it the Early Toarcian extinction. Furthermore, as stated in this article the TOAE technically refers strictly to the oceanic anoxic event, not the hyperthermal, the ocean acidification, and the myriad of other Earth system changes associated with this time, all of which this article extensively covers. @Hemiauchenia reverted my edit and suggested having two separate articles, one about the TOAE strictly and the other about the broader extinction event, but this would be incredibly redundant, as the TOAE, though not the only pulse, was by far the most significant. Furthermore, many sites aren't precisely constrained enough to clearly distinguish the PTo-E and TOAE, and the extinctions of certain clades aren't necessarily constrainable to one or the other pulse. And most studies, with a rare exception, find both these events to share the common driver of Karoo-Ferrar volcanism. Two separate articles would just generate confusion and have a very high degree of overlap anyway with zero benefit. Anteosaurus magnificus (talk) 01:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 02:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 30, 2023

Elapsed listings

Shortcut
The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.

Backlog

Shortcut
Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.

Malformed requests

See "Bot considerations"

References

References generally should not appear here. Use {{reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Current_discussions&oldid=1164097347"