User talk:Research17

Nomination of Tom Lonsdale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Lonsdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Lonsdale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Julia Leigh page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, apologies for this. Will see if I can rectify. Thanks for the heads-up. Research17 (talk) 02:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Lonsdale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Lonsdale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Lonsdale (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 23:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Research17. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 04:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

re: "Brian Martin (Social Scientist)"

Hi. If people agreed that social scientists were not excluded, then that would mean this entry is not automatically excluded, and that much would be fine. I just found that there is indeed a WP article for him, which had not been linked by the person who included the new species name, so had missed it. His claim to fame seems somewhat dubious, but if people are okay with such figures, then go ahead and re-add the reference, with an appropriate link. Dyanega (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Question for you

Hi Research17. I just reviewed the history of this page, and realized that no one has asked you if you have any relationship with Brian Martin - the edit count tool shows that this article has been your main area of focus in Wikipedia.

If you have some real world relationship with him, that would constitute a COI in Wikipedia per the WP:COI guideline. Would you please disclose if you have some relationship with him? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

? Let me say it differently -- would you please clarify whether or not you have some RW relationship with him? Jytdog (talk) 19:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Sure. I have looked at WP;COI and I can confirm that I have no personal, academic, professional, business or legal relationship with BM. I should say I am interested in some of the issues which BM raises, although I don't think this constitutes a COI, especially as the contested nature of this article is an indication that many others are also interested in these issues. Just for the record, I am not an anti-vaxxer, and I am little uneasy with BM's philosophy of science, although I probably need to think more on this. You're correct, I have spent some time on this article, and the reason is that I think this represents a particular challenge for Wikipedia, in terms of constructing a bio of someone who clearly has some vocal critics. This is why I am working hard to establish consensus. As I have indicated in the talk pages, I like to think that we are slowly making some progress here. Thanks for the query. Research17 (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC).

Thanks for replying. Jytdog (talk) 00:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Just a brief extension of the above comments, to confirm that I also have no personal, professional, business or legal relationship with Judith Wilyman. BTW, I think that an edit count alone may be at times be misleading. Because the BM wikipedia page is so deeply controversial and so contested, I've found myself making multiple postings on the Talk Page, in an attempt if not to reach consensus, then at least to open up dialogue. I've been involved in creating or editing numerous other WP pages, which have been much more straightfoward. Not sure if this shows up on the edit-count. Research17 (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hal Porter Short Story Prize moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hal Porter Short Story Prize, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jake Lynch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BDS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Hal Porter Short Story Prize concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hal Porter Short Story Prize, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hal Porter Short Story Prize

Hello, Research17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hal Porter Short Story Prize".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

May 2021

Your edit to Frank Warrick has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. --- Possibly (talk) 06:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Respectfully disagree that there was a copyright violation, but, hey, I think the Frank Warrick article will probably be added to and expanded upon in any case in the next day or so, as this is in the news due to his recent death. Thanks for your own interest and contribution to the article. Research17 (talk) 10:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Australian Council for Human Rights Education

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Australian Council for Human Rights Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:50, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Dowden (scientist)

A tag has been placed on Richard Dowden (scientist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

doesn't pass g11. Obit cannot be only thing to determine notability.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2607:FB91:888C:A62:AC39:D1F7:4DF2:DE59 (talk) 10:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)