Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CW Real Estate: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
:'''Delete''' as quite obviously promo and (less obviously, but I googled a bit) non-notable. [[User:Deckkohl|Deckkohl]] ([[User talk:Deckkohl|talk]]) 18:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' as quite obviously promo and (less obviously, but I googled a bit) non-notable. [[User:Deckkohl|Deckkohl]] ([[User talk:Deckkohl|talk]]) 18:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' fails [[WP:NORG]], which must have significant, in depth, independent coverage on the subject. There must be absolute minimum of two such sources and one of them has to be [[WP:AUD|broad audience]] such as national or international. Needless to say, they all need to be [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. [[User:Graywalls|Graywalls]] ([[User talk:Graywalls|talk]]) 23:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' fails [[WP:NORG]], which must have significant, in depth, independent coverage on the subject. There must be absolute minimum of two such sources and one of them has to be [[WP:AUD|broad audience]] such as national or international. Needless to say, they all need to be [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. [[User:Graywalls|Graywalls]] ([[User talk:Graywalls|talk]]) 23:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
*Keep i understand that it is a company which is likely trying to appear on wikipedia. Since there are other companies alike on wikipedia, I think it should be keep for further review by other editors who would come across it.[[User:Engrdrizzy|Engrdrizzy]] ([[User talk:Engrdrizzy|talk]]) 09:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
*:'''Keep''' i understand that it is a company which is likely trying to appear on wikipedia. Since there are other companies alike on wikipedia, I think it should be keep for further review by other editors who would come across it.[[User:Engrdrizzy|Engrdrizzy]] ([[User talk:Engrdrizzy|talk]]) 09:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:45, 10 July 2023

CW Real Estate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flowery text used, winner of a non-notable award. Largely appears promo. Many of the sources used read as PR pieces. Not meeting notability requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 22:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as quite obviously promo and (less obviously, but I googled a bit) non-notable. Deckkohl (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NORG, which must have significant, in depth, independent coverage on the subject. There must be absolute minimum of two such sources and one of them has to be broad audience such as national or international. Needless to say, they all need to be reliable source. Graywalls (talk) 23:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep i understand that it is a company which is likely trying to appear on wikipedia. Since there are other companies alike on wikipedia, I think it should be keep for further review by other editors who would come across it.Engrdrizzy (talk) 09:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]