User talk:PackMecEng: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
PackMecEng (talk | contribs) |
PackMecEng (talk | contribs) OneClickArchiver archived 1 discussion to User talk:PackMecEng/Archive 6 |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
||
== Bike == |
|||
How is it going with your Triumph Trident? I ''did'' eventually get the Speed Twin (the 1200) soon after our [[User_talk:Scjessey#Trident_660|conversation]]. In fact, I started a [https://www.youtube.com/TrekkieMoto YouTube Channel] that features it. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 15:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:Its been pretty great actually! Though wondering if I wouldn't mind getting a cruiser sister to go with it. It is hard to have just one sometimes. I will have to check out your channel more, always loved the look of the Speed Twins. =) [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 01:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::I have been considering getting a Triumph Tiger Sport 660, which is like a touring version of your Trident. The Speed Twin isn't really comfortable enough for all-day riding, and I've had to pass up on a few group rides where having a more comfortable tourer would've been handy. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 14:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::Kind of the same thing I have run into! I am just not sure what I would really want to get. I am to short for an adventure bike and not really looking for a classic bagger. I like the Harley Sportster S but I am not sure how that would do on real long distance. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 01:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::Hmm. If you are looking for a lower height but with more long-distance comfort, I'd probably recommend a Honda Rebel 500; however, you would have to rely on panniers and a tank bag if you wanted to tour extensively. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 15:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I did look at the Rebel 500 and 1100! They seem like a really good value for money and hard to go wrong with Honda. One of my friends had a Rebel 250 long ago and was thinking of getting back into riding, I am steering her towards the 500 as well. [[User:PackMecEng|PackMecEng]] ([[User talk:PackMecEng#top|talk]]) 22:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
::::::They are basically bulletproof, so definitely a solid choice if you want that low seat. They have a pretty good range of aftermarket accessories too. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 16:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== User:Adoring_nanny’s essay on Lab leaks. == |
== User:Adoring_nanny’s essay on Lab leaks. == |
||
Revision as of 23:40, 12 July 2023
User:Adoring_nanny’s essay on Lab leaks.
Hello PackMecEng.
Would you please further explain your revert here. “Not needed just yet, please see the recent afd”.
What is your interest in this essay, or User:Adoring nanny?
What is your criteria for “needed”? If not “just yet”, then when? Do you know the difference between mfd and afd? You did not participate in the mfd, so why the interest now and not during the mfd?
- SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- @SmokeyJoe: I admit that I did participate in the MFD discussion[1], but I experienced a momentary lapse in recalling the meaning of the three-letter acronyms involved. However, upon reflection, I failed to perceive a clear consensus to blank the page during that MFD, nor did I personally find significant value in doing so. The notion of blanking the page struck me as akin to engaging in grave dancing, which left me with reservations about supporting such an action. It's important to carefully consider the implications and potential ramifications before making decisions that involve altering or removing content, particularly when it comes to topics that hold significance or have historical context. PackMecEng (talk) 23:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)