Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperwolf (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→SSSniperwolf: keep |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 05:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|SSSniperwolf (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p> |
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 05:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|SSSniperwolf (2nd nomination)]]</noinclude></p> |
||
*'''Delete''' Hardly anything found in RS, most is PR stuff [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/youtube-megastar-sssniperwolf-kicks-off-211800282.html], this is about the most non-PR thing I can find [https://gamerant.com/sssniperwolf-jacksfilms-youtube-controversy-explained/]. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 13:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Hardly anything found in RS, most is PR stuff [https://finance.yahoo.com/news/youtube-megastar-sssniperwolf-kicks-off-211800282.html], this is about the most non-PR thing I can find [https://gamerant.com/sssniperwolf-jacksfilms-youtube-controversy-explained/]. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 13:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Surprised this was even nominated, but I'm also surprised the WP:BEFORE searches don't make notability here crystal clear. Mentioned in a few books and a couple scholarly articles. Would like to do a better recent media search than the major search engines allow. [[User:SportingFlyer|SportingFlyer]] ''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:top;">[[User talk:SportingFlyer|T]]</span>''·''<span style="font-size:small; vertical-align:bottom;">[[Special:Contributions/SportingFlyer|C]]</span>'' 21:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:47, 13 July 2023
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SSSniperwolf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Youtuber. Fails WP:GNG. No notability. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Internet. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - I found [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], etc. Clearly notable, literally has over 30000000 subsrcibers, many sources like in ongoing high profile career. Article needs improvement, to deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please consider adding independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage. Many of the sources you provided here are a bit lacking, try to find 2 or 3 of the best. See WP:GNG. Also note big numbers won't get a lot of traction here. —siroχo 10:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Most of those are trivial mentions or in sources we don't consider notable. Sub numbers aren't really a marker of reliability here, as they can be bought. Unless she's had in independent auditing firm confirm her numbers, we can't use them. Oaktree b (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The article might be notable, but it doesn't provide the best sourcing in its current condition. Conyo14 (talk) 06:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Entertainment. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - large amounts of internet points do not automatically make one notable. does not include reliable sources, either. DrowssapSMM (talk) 22:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Hardly anything found in RS, most is PR stuff [10], this is about the most non-PR thing I can find [11]. Oaktree b (talk) 13:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Surprised this was even nominated, but I'm also surprised the WP:BEFORE searches don't make notability here crystal clear. Mentioned in a few books and a couple scholarly articles. Would like to do a better recent media search than the major search engines allow. SportingFlyer T·C 21:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)