Lonely runner conjecture: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 10:23, 15 July 2023

Unsolved problem in mathematics:

Is the lonely runner conjecture true for every number of runners?

(more unsolved problems in mathematics)

In number theory, specifically the study of Diophantine approximation, the lonely runner conjecture is a conjecture about the long-term behavior of runners on a circular track. It states that $n$ runners on a track of unit length, with constant speeds all distinct from one another, will each be lonely at some time—at least $1/n$ units away from all others.

The conjecture was first posed in 1967 by German mathematician Jörg M. Wills, in purely number-theoretic terms, and independently in 1974 by T. W. Cusick; its illustrative and now-popular formulation dates to 1998. The conjecture is known to be true for 7 runners or less, but the general case remains unsolved. Implications of the conjecture include solutions to view-obstruction problems and bounds on properties, related to chromatic numbers, of certain graphs.

Formulation

Consider $n$ runners on a circular track of unit length. At the initial time $t=0$ , all runners are at the same position and start to run; the runners' speeds are constant, all distinct, and may be negative. A runner is said to be lonely at time $t$ if they are at a distance (measured along the circle) of at least $1/n$ from every other runner. The lonely runner conjecture states that each runner is lonely at some time, no matter the choice of speeds.^[1]

This visual formulation of the conjecture was first published in 1998.^[2] In many formulations, including the original by Jörg M. Wills,^[3]^[4] some simplifications are made. The runner to be lonely is stationary at 0 (with zero speed), and therefore $n-1$ other runners, with nonzero speeds, are considered.^[a] The moving runners may be further restricted to positive speeds only: by symmetry, runners with speeds $x$ and $-x$ have the same distance from 0 at all times, and so are essentially equivalent. Proving the result for any stationary runner implies the general result for all runners, since they can be made stationary by subtracting their speed from all runners, leaving them with zero speed. The conjecture then states that, for any collection $v_{1},v_{2},...,v_{n-1}$ of positive, distinct speeds, there exists some time $t>0$ such that ${\frac {1}{n}}\leq \operatorname {frac} (v_{i}t)\leq 1-{\frac {1}{n}}\qquad (i=1,...,n-1),$ where $\operatorname {frac} (x)$ denotes the fractional part of $x$ .^[6] Interpreted visually, if the runners are running counterclockwise, the middle term of the inequality is the distance from the origin to the $i$ th runner at time $t$ , measured counterclockwise.^[b] This convention is used for the rest of this article. Wills' conjecture was part of his work in Diophantine approximation,^[7] the study of how closely fractions can approximate irrational numbers.

Implications

Suppose $C$ is a $n$ -hypercube of side length $s$ in $n$ -dimensional space ( $n\geq 2$ ). Place a centered copy of $C$ at every point with half-integer coordinates. A ray from the origin may either miss all of the copies of $C$ , in which case there is a (infinitesimal) gap, or hit at least one copy. Cusick (1973) made an independent formulation of the lonely runner conjecture in this context; the conjecture implies that there are gaps if and only if $s<(n-1)/(n+1)$ , ignoring rays lying in one of the coordinate hyperplanes.^[8] For example, placed in 2-dimensional space, squares any smaller than $1/3$ in side length will leave gaps, as shown, and squares with side length $1/3$ or greater will obstruct every ray that is not parallel to an axis. The conjecture generalizes this observation into any number of dimensions.

In graph theory, a distance graph $G$ on the set of integers, and using some finite set $D$ of positive integer distances, has an edge between $x,y$ if and only if $|x-y|\in D$ . For example, if $D=\{2\}$ , every consecutive pair of even integers, and of odd integers, is adjacent, all together forming two connected components. A $k$ -regular coloring of the integers with step $\lambda \in \mathbb {R}$ assigns to each integer $n$ one of $k$ colors based on the residue of $\lfloor \lambda n\rfloor$ modulo $k$ . For example, if $\lambda =0.5$ , the coloring repeats every $2k$ integers and each pair of integers $2m,2m+1$ are the same color. Taking $k=|D|+1$ , the lonely runner conjecture implies $G$ admits a proper $k$ -regular coloring (i.e., each node is colored differently than its adjacencies) for some step value.^[9] For example, $(k,\lambda )=(2,0.5)$ generates a proper coloring on the distance graph generated by $D=\{2\}$ . ( $k$ is known as the regular chromatic number of $D$ .)

Given a directed graph $G$ , a nowhere-zero flow on $G$ associates a positive value $f(e)$ to each edge $e$ , such that the flow outward from each node is equal to the flow inward. The lonely runner conjecture implies that, if $G$ has a nowhere-zero flow with at most $k$ distinct integer values, then $G$ has a nowhere-zero flow with values only in $\{1,2,\ldots ,k\}$ (possibly after reversing the directions of some arcs of $G$ ). This result was proven for $k\geq 5$ with separate methods, and because the smaller cases of the lonely runner conjecture are settled, the full theorem is proven.^[10]

Known results

For a given setup of runners, let $\delta$ denote the smallest of the runners' maximum distances of loneliness, and the gap of loneliness^[11] $\delta _{n}$ denote the minimum $\delta$ across all setups with $n$ runners. In this notation, the conjecture asserts that $\delta _{n}\geq 1/n$ , a bound which, if correct, cannot be improved. For example, if the runner to be lonely is stationary and speeds $v_{i}=i$ are chosen, then there is no time at which they are strictly more than $1/n$ units away from all others, showing that $\delta _{n}\leq 1/n$ .^[c] Alternatively, this conclusion can be quickly derived from the Dirichlet approximation theorem. For $n\geq 2$ a simple lower bound $\delta _{n}\geq 1/(2n-2)$ may be obtained via a probability argument.^[12]

The conjecture can be reduced to restricting the runners' speeds to positive integers: If the conjecture is true for $n$ runners with integer speeds, it is true for $n$ runners with real speeds.^[13]

Tighter bounds

Slight improvements on the lower bound $1/(2n-2)$ are known. Chen & Cusick (1999) showed for $n\geq 5$ that if $2n-5$ is prime, then $\delta _{n}\geq {\tfrac {1}{2n-5}}$ , and if $4n-9$ is prime, then $\delta _{n}\geq {\tfrac {2}{4n-9}}$ . Perarnau & Serra (2016) showed unconditionally for sufficiently large $n$ that $\delta _{n}\geq {\frac {1}{2n-4+o(1)}}.$

Tao (2018) proved the current best known asymptotic result: for sufficiently large $n$ , $\delta _{n}\geq {\frac {1}{2n-2}}+{\frac {c\log n}{n^{2}(\log \log n)^{2}}}$ for some constant $c>0$ . He also showed that the full conjecture is implied by proving the conjecture for integer speeds of size $n^{O(n^{2})}$ (see big O notation). This implication theoretically allows proving the conjecture for a given $n$ by checking a finite set of cases, but the number of cases grows too quickly to be practical.^[14]

The conjecture has been proven under specific assumptions on the runners' speeds. For sufficiently large $n$ , it holds true if ${\frac {v_{i+1}}{v_{i}}}\geq 1+{\frac {22\log(n-1)}{n-1}}\qquad (i=1,...,n-2).$ In other words, the conjecture holds true for large $n$ if the speeds grow quickly enough. If the constant 22 is replaced with 33, then the conjecture holds true for $n\geq 16343$ .^[15] A similar result for sufficiently large $n$ only requires a similar assumption for $i=\lfloor n/22\rfloor -1,...,n-2$ .^[14] Unconditionally on $n$ , the conjecture is true if $v_{i+1}/v_{i}\geq 2$ for all $i$ .^[16]

For specific $n$

The conjecture is true for $n\leq 7$ runners. The proofs for $n\leq 3$ are elementary; the $n=4$ case was established in 1972.^[17] The $n=5$ , $n=6$ , and $n=7$ cases were settled in 1984, 2001 and 2008, respectively. The first proof for $n=5$ was computer-assisted, but all cases have since been proved with elementary methods.^[18]

For some $n$ , there exist sporadic examples with a maximum separation of $1/n$ besides the example of $v_{i}=i$ given above.^[6] For $n=5$ , the only known example (up to shifts and scaling) is $\{0,1,3,4,7\}$ ; for $n=6$ the only known example is $\{0,1,3,4,5,9\}$ ; and for $n=8$ the known examples are $\{0,1,4,5,6,7,11,13\}$ and $\{0,1,2,3,4,5,7,12\}$ .^[19] There exists an explicit infinite family of such sporadic cases.^[20]

Kravitz (2021) formulated a sharper version of the conjecture that addresses near-equality cases. More specifically, he conjectures that for a given set of speeds $v_{i}$ , either $\delta =s/(s(n-1)+1)$ for some positive integer $s$ ,^[d] or $\delta \geq 1/(n-1)$ , where $\delta$ is that setup's gap of loneliness. He confirmed this conjecture for $n\leq 4$ and a few special cases.

Rifford (2022) addressed the question of the size of the time required for a runner to get lonely. He formulated a stronger conjecture stating that for every integer $n\geq 3$ there is a positive integer $N$ such that for any collection $v_{1},v_{2},...,v_{n-1}$ of positive, distinct speeds, there exists some time $t>0$ such that $\operatorname {frac} (v_{i}t)\in [1/n,1-1/n]$ for $i=1,...n-1$ with $t\leq {\frac {N}{\operatorname {min} (v_{1},...,v_{n-1})}}.$ Rifford confirmed this conjecture for $n=3,4,5,6$ and showed that the minimal $N$ in each case is given by $N=1$ for $n=3,4,5$ and $N=2$ for $n=6$ .

Other results

A much stronger result exists for randomly chosen speeds: using the stationary-runner convention, if $n$ and $\varepsilon >0$ are fixed and $n-1$ runners with nonzero speeds are chosen uniformly at random from $\{1,2,\ldots ,k\}$ , then $P(\delta \geq 1/2-\varepsilon )\to 1$ as $k\to \infty$ . In other words, runners with random speeds are likely at some point to be "very lonely"—nearly $1/2$ units from the nearest other runner.^[21] The full conjecture is true if "loneliness" is replaced with "almost aloneness", meaning at most one other runner is within $1/n$ of a given runner.^[22] The conjecture has been generalized to an analog in algebraic function fields.^[23]

Notes and references

Notes

^ Some authors use the convention that $n$ is the number of non-stationary runners, and thus the conjecture is that the gap of loneliness is at most $1/(n+1)$ .^[5]
^ For example, if the origin is at a 6 o'clock position, a runner at the 9 o'clock position will have $\operatorname {frac} (vt)=3/4$ .
^ Let the lonely runner be fixed at 0. For sake of contradiction, suppose there exists $t$ such that $\{v_{i}t\}\in (1/n,1-1/n)$ for all $i$ . By the pigeonhole principle, there exist distinct $i$ and $j$ such that $\{v_{i}t\}\leq \{v_{j}t\}<\{v_{i}t\}+1/n$ But $\|v_{j}-v_{i}\|=v_{k}$ for some $k$ , so either $\{v_{k}t\}=\{v_{j}t\}-\{v_{i}t\}<1/n$ or $\{v_{k}t\}=1-(\{v_{j}t\}-\{v_{i}t\})>1-1/n$ , a contradiction.^[6]
^ Taking $s=1$ yields the lonely runner conjecture.

Citations

^ Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, p. 1.
^ Bienia et al. 1998, p. 3.
^ Wills 1967; Bienia et al. 1998.
^ Wills 1967.
^ Tao 2018.
^ ^a ^b ^c Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, p. 2.
^ Wills 1967; Betke & Wills 1972.
^ Cusick 1974, p. 1.
^ Barajas & Serra 2009, p. 5688.
^ Bienia et al. 1998.
^ Perarnau & Serra 2016.
^ Tao 2018, pp. 2–3.
^ Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, pp. 12–13.
^ ^a ^b Czerwiński 2018, p. 1302.
^ Dubickas 2011, p. 27.
^ Barajas & Serra 2009.
^ Betke & Wills 1972, pp. 215–216; Cusick 1974, p. 5. Cusick's paper independently proves this result.
^ Cusick & Pomerance 1984, p. 133; Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001; Barajas & Serra 2008a; Renault 2004. Renault gives an elementary proof for $n=6$ .
^ Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, p. 3.
^ Goddyn & Wong 2006.
^ Czerwiński 2012, p. 2.
^ Czerwiński & Grytczuk 2008.
^ Chow & Rimanić 2019.

Works cited

Barajas, Javier; Serra, Oriol (2008a). "The lonely runner with seven runners". The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 15 (1): R48. doi:10.37236/772.
——; —— (September 2009). "On the chromatic number of circulant graphs". Discrete Mathematics. 309 (18): 5687–5696. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2008.04.041.
Betke, U.; Wills, J. M. (1972). "Untere schranken für zwei diophantische approximations-funktionen". Monatshefte für Mathematik. 76 (3): 214. doi:10.1007/BF01322924. S2CID 122549668.
Bienia, Wojciech; Goddyn, Luis; Gvozdjak, Pavol; Sebő, András; Tarsi, Michael (January 1998). "Flows, view obstructions, and the lonely runner". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B. 72 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1006/jctb.1997.1770.
Bohman, Tom; Holzman, Ron; Kleitman, Dan (February 2001). "Six lonely runners". The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 8 (2): R3. doi:10.37236/1602.
Chen, Yong-Gao; Cusick, T. W. (January 1999). "The view-obstruction problem for n-dimensional cubes". Journal of Number Theory. 74 (1): 126–133. doi:10.1006/jnth.1998.2309.
Chow, Sam; Rimanić, Luka (January 2019). "Lonely runners in function fields" (PDF). Mathematika. 65 (3): 677–701. doi:10.1112/S002557931900007X. S2CID 118621899.
Cusick, T. W. (1973). "View-obstruction problems". Aequationes Mathematicae. 9 (2–3): 165–170. doi:10.1007/BF01832623. S2CID 122050409.
—— (1974). "View-obstruction problems in n-dimensional geometry". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A. 16 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/0097-3165(74)90066-1.
——; Pomerance, Carl (1984). "View-obstruction problems, III". Journal of Number Theory. 19 (2): 131–139. doi:10.1016/0022-314X(84)90097-0.
Czerwiński, Sebastian (2012). "Random runners are very lonely". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A. 119 (6): 1194–1199. arXiv:1102.4464. doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2012.02.002. S2CID 26415692.
—— (May 2018). "The lonely runner problem for lacunary sequences". Discrete Mathematics. 341 (5): 1301–1306. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2018.02.002.
——; Grytczuk, Jarosław (September 2008). "Invisible runners in finite fields". Information Processing Letters. 108 (2): 64–67. doi:10.1016/j.ipl.2008.03.019.
Dubickas, A. (2011). "The lonely runner problem for many runners". Glasnik Matematicki. 46: 25–30. doi:10.3336/gm.46.1.05.
Goddyn, L.; Wong, Erick B. (2006). "Tight instances of the lonely runner" (PDF). Integers. 6 (A38). Retrieved 1 May 2022.
Kravitz, N. (2021). "Barely lonely runners and very lonely runners: a refined approach to the Lonely Runner Problem". Combinatorial Theory. 1. arXiv:1912.06034. doi:10.5070/C61055383. S2CID 245100000.
Perarnau, Guillem; Serra, Oriol (March 2016). "Correlation among runners and some results on the lonely runner conjecture". The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 23 (1): P1.50. doi:10.37236/5123. S2CID 7039062.
Renault, J. (2004). "View-obstruction: A shorter proof for 6 lonely runners". Discrete Mathematics. 287 (1–3): 93–101. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2004.06.008.
Rifford, L. (2022). "On the time for a runner to get lonely" (PDF). Acta Applicandae Mathematicae. 180: Paper No. 15. doi:10.1007/s10440-022-00515-9.
Tao, Terence (31 December 2018). "Some remarks on the lonely runner conjecture". Contributions to Discrete Mathematics. 13: No 2 (2018). doi:10.11575/cdm.v13i2.62728.
Wills, Jörg M. (1967). "Zwei sätze über inhomogene diophantische approximation von irrationalzehlen". Monatshefte für Mathematik. 71 (3): 263–269. doi:10.1007/BF01298332. S2CID 122754182.

External links

Article in the Open Problem Garden no. 4, 551–562.

[6] Some authors use the convention that $n$ is the number of non-stationary runners, and thus the conjecture is that the gap of loneliness is at most $1/(n+1)$ .^[5]

[8] For example, if the origin is at a 6 o'clock position, a runner at the 9 o'clock position will have $\operatorname {frac} (vt)=3/4$ .

[14] Let the lonely runner be fixed at 0. For sake of contradiction, suppose there exists $t$ such that $\{v_{i}t\}\in (1/n,1-1/n)$ for all $i$ . By the pigeonhole principle, there exist distinct $i$ and $j$ such that $\{v_{i}t\}\leq \{v_{j}t\}<\{v_{i}t\}+1/n$ But $\|v_{j}-v_{i}\|=v_{k}$ for some $k$ , so either $\{v_{k}t\}=\{v_{j}t\}-\{v_{i}t\}<1/n$ or $\{v_{k}t\}=1-(\{v_{j}t\}-\{v_{i}t\})>1-1/n$ , a contradiction.^[6]

[24] Taking $s=1$ yields the lonely runner conjecture.

[FOOTNOTEBohmanHolzmanKleitman20011-1] Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, p. 1.

[FOOTNOTEBieniaGoddynGvozdjakSebő19983-2] Bienia et al. 1998, p. 3.

[FOOTNOTEWills1967BieniaGoddynGvozdjakSebő1998-3] Wills 1967; Bienia et al. 1998.

[FOOTNOTEWills1967-4] Wills 1967.

[FOOTNOTETao2018-5] Tao 2018.

[FOOTNOTEBohmanHolzmanKleitman20012-7] Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, p. 2.

[FOOTNOTEWills1967BetkeWills1972-9] Wills 1967; Betke & Wills 1972.

[FOOTNOTECusick19741-10] Cusick 1974, p. 1.

[FOOTNOTEBarajasSerra20095688-11] Barajas & Serra 2009, p. 5688.

[FOOTNOTEBieniaGoddynGvozdjakSebő1998-12] Bienia et al. 1998.

[FOOTNOTEPerarnauSerra2016-13] Perarnau & Serra 2016.

[FOOTNOTETao20182–3-15] Tao 2018, pp. 2–3.

[FOOTNOTEBohmanHolzmanKleitman200112–13-16] Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, pp. 12–13.

[FOOTNOTECzerwiński20181302-17] Czerwiński 2018, p. 1302.

[FOOTNOTEDubickas201127-18] Dubickas 2011, p. 27.

[FOOTNOTEBarajasSerra2009-19] Barajas & Serra 2009.

[FOOTNOTEBetkeWills1972215–216Cusick19745-20] Betke & Wills 1972, pp. 215–216; Cusick 1974, p. 5. Cusick's paper independently proves this result.

[FOOTNOTECusickPomerance1984133BohmanHolzmanKleitman2001BarajasSerra2008aRenault2004-21] Cusick & Pomerance 1984, p. 133; Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001; Barajas & Serra 2008a; Renault 2004. Renault gives an elementary proof for $n=6$ .

[FOOTNOTEBohmanHolzmanKleitman20013-22] Bohman, Holzman & Kleitman 2001, p. 3.

[FOOTNOTEGoddynWong2006-23] Goddyn & Wong 2006.

[FOOTNOTECzerwiński20122-25] Czerwiński 2012, p. 2.

[FOOTNOTECzerwińskiGrytczuk2008-26] Czerwiński & Grytczuk 2008.

[FOOTNOTEChowRimanić2019-27] Chow & Rimanić 2019.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[a]

[6]

[b]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[c]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[d]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[5]

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 {{harvtxt|Kravitz|2021}} formulated a sharper version of the conjecture that addresses near-equality cases. More specifically, he conjectures that for a given set of speeds <math>v_i</math>, either <math>\delta = s/(s(n-1)+1)</math> for some positive integer <math>s</math>,{{efn|Taking <math>s=1</math> yields the lonely runner conjecture.}} or <math>\delta \geq 1/(n-1)</math>, where <math>\delta</math> is that setup's gap of loneliness. He confirmed this conjecture for <math>n\leq 4</math> and a few special cases.
-{{harvtxt|Rifford|2022}} addressed the question of the size of the time required for a runner to get lonely. He formulated a stronger conjecture stating that for every integer <math>n \geq 3</math> there is a positive integer <math>N</math> such that for any collection <math>v_1,v_2,...,v_{n-1}</math> of positive, distinct speeds, there exists some time <math>t>0</math> such that <math>\operatorname{frac}(v_it)\in [1/n,1-1/n]</math> with
+{{harvtxt|Rifford|2022}} addressed the question of the size of the time required for a runner to get lonely. He formulated a stronger conjecture stating that for every integer <math>n \geq 3</math> there is a positive integer <math>N</math> such that for any collection <math>v_1,v_2,...,v_{n-1}</math> of positive, distinct speeds, there exists some time <math>t>0</math> such that <math>\operatorname{frac}(v_it)\in [1/n,1-1/n]</math> for <math>i=1, ...n-1</math> with
 <math display="block">t \leq \frac{N}{\operatorname{min} (v_1,..., v_{n-1})}.</math>
 Rifford confirmed this conjecture for <math>n=3,4,5,6</math> and showed that the minimal <math>N</math> in each case is given by <math>N=1</math> for <math>n=3,4,5</math> and <math>N=2</math> for <math>n=6</math>.