Talk:Conservative Party of Canada: Difference between revisions
Ak-eater06 (talk | contribs) |
Ak-eater06 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Examining Federal Debt in Canada by Prime Ministers Since Confederation, 2022.<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>-[[File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg|15px|link=User talk:Moxy]] 23:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC) |
Examining Federal Debt in Canada by Prime Ministers Since Confederation, 2022.<span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">[[User:Moxy|Moxy]]</span>-[[File:Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg|15px|link=User talk:Moxy]] 23:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
Fine. I'm okay with changing it to "Canadian Conservatism" |
Fine. I'm okay with changing it to "Canadian Conservatism". The [[UK Conservative Party]] article using "British Conservatism" changed by opinion on this edit conflict. The definition of conservatism varies from country to country too (e.g. a Conservative in Canada, the UK, Australia might not be considered conservative in the US). [[User:Ak-eater06|'''<span style="color:#A2CEC2">Ak-eater06</span>''']] ([[User talk:Ak-eater06#top|talk]]) 01:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:51, 19 July 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Conservative Party of Canada article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Removing "Internal Factions" from infobox
Would like to seek a consensus on this. The difference between a Blue Tory/Red Tory is best presented elsewhere in the article. It does not provide an objective reader with an accurate, objective view of the party's ideology. When objectively used, these terms best describe historical conservatism in Canada.
The contemporary Conservative Party is not defined by Red Toryism/Blue Toryism, at all. The latter term is hardly used to describe any federal Conservative politician.
"Red Tory" describes practically nobody in the parliamentary caucus. From my experience, the only people who use this term are those trying to present the party in a pejorative manner. I challenge anybody in support of this to tell me the leader of the "Red Tory" faction in the Conservative Party.
Presenting a party whose leader won as a non-incumbent with 71% of the votes cast and a 59 point margin as having deep-rooted internal factions is simply misrepresentation. Deathying (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Updates to ideology infobox
Would also like to seek a consensus on this to avoid an edit war with Ak-eater06.
There currently is a comment advising against a change to linking Conservatism with Conservatism in Canada in the infobox. I would like to make this infobox consistent with other conservative parties such as the GOP, Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, Conservative Party (UK). I cannot find any prior discussion in the archives besides comments supportive of what I want to do here. Talk:Conservative_Party_of_Canada/Archive_2#Internal_factions, from 2017. If you do have a link to why this comment was made, please link it.
Under the ideology row, we should change Conservatism to Conservatism (Canadian)
This is in line with the examples I linked above, and recognizes the differences between the CPC and the ideology itself. The CPC's ideology and how conservative they can actually be is heavily defined by Canadian culture and values, warranting some distinction here.
We should also add Fiscal conservatism back as an ideology associated with the party, especially when it is so plainly spelled out in the party constitution and party platform. I might add the last (relatively) balanced budget in Canadian history was introduced by this party. If that's not fiscal conservatism, I don't know what is. Deathying (talk) 20:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- I would have no problem with Canadian conservatism change.... but fiscal conservative is a pipe dream....Fraser Institute
https://www.fraserinstitute.org › ...PDF Examining Federal Debt in Canada by Prime Ministers Since Confederation, 2022.Moxy- 23:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Fine. I'm okay with changing it to "Canadian Conservatism". The UK Conservative Party article using "British Conservatism" changed by opinion on this edit conflict. The definition of conservatism varies from country to country too (e.g. a Conservative in Canada, the UK, Australia might not be considered conservative in the US). Ak-eater06 (talk) 01:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Canada-related articles
- High-importance Canada-related articles
- B-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- High-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- B-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- B-Class political party articles
- Top-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Conservatism articles
- High-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles