User talk:Taavi: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Undid revision 1166272275 by 196.192.186.58 (talk) - Random blanking |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:Taavi/Talk headers}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|||
| algo = old(14d) |
|||
| archive = User talk:Taavi/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
| counter = 4 |
|||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator |style=margin: 1px !important; border: 2px solid #ddd; background-color: #f9f9f9; color: black; padding: 10px !important;}} |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
| minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
}} |
|||
== Is this intended behaviour? == |
== Is this intended behaviour? == |
||
Revision as of 13:38, 20 July 2023
| This is Taavi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 | This user prefers to be notified by Notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to this user. No talkback messages are needed. Please keep conversations in one place. |
Is this intended behaviour?
In diff:1161028592, at the very bottom, the bot adds a template that says it fixed the page title of the report. It obviously did not do that, as there was not even a report, just random characters. Is that the "notify" behaviour mentioned in item a) of User:MajavahBot? – 2804:F14:80B3:CB01:9C5E:86B:78D9:3A49 (talk) 05:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- This is a pretty classic GIGO case. I'll patch the bot at some point to not leave a comment if it can't add the page title, but it's not a particularly severe bug. Taavi (talk!) 11:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Odd edit by bot
I'm looking at this edit, and I think the bot erroneously marked the edit as fixed (the edit summary included the claim that the bot added the affected page name, but it does not appear to have done so). The edit was very broken to begin with, but just wanted to let you know. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I'm looking at this edit, and the bot appears to have marked it as fixed despite not having fixed it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk Indeed, it seems to do that when the report formatting is already completely broken. I thought I had fixed this already but apparently not. Taavi (talk!) 16:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk I think this is now really fixed, ping me if you see it happen again please? Taavi (talk!) 22:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Will do. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk I think this is now really fixed, ping me if you see it happen again please? Taavi (talk!) 22:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Courtesy note regarding changes to EFFP template
There is currently a discussion at Template talk:EFFP regarding changes to a template that is used by your bot. Thank you.. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Bot down?
Not sure if you were already told or noticed, but MajavahBot appears to be unresponsive. It has not been archiving or commenting on any WP:EF/FP/R report since around ~19 hours ago (15:29, 11 July 2023 UTC), although it did edit its Bot status report page 2 hours later. – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 10:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Seems your change fixed it: diff:1165000895. 👍 – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed. Quite ironically it was broken because I was working on adding checks that would catch these kinds of programming errors automatically in the future. Taavi (talk!) 10:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can't claim that is not relatable 😅. – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 11:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed. Quite ironically it was broken because I was working on adding checks that would catch these kinds of programming errors automatically in the future. Taavi (talk!) 10:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)