User talk:Technobabylon: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:14, 29 July 2023

This is Technobabylon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Risk Management Council (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Their website, what those affiliated with them have written or said are primary and not independent so cannot be used to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Risk Management Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Technobabylon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Risk Management Council (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Risk Management Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evgueni Ivantsov (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evgueni Ivantsov and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Technobabylon, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Technobabylon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Theroadislong,

I confirm that I am NOT in any way being paid to write any articles and have no association with any of the subjects of my articles (Evgueni Ivantsov or European Risk Management Council). I find it very disappointing that such sweeping remarks are made about myself simply based on guesses and assumptions on your part without any evidence of me having a financial stake in the subject. I will make the necessary edits to the articles where required, but I would like to request for yourself to please refrain from jumping to conclusions or making false accusations about myself and my work. With that being said, I very much hope I can continue to edit and post further articles in the future.

Kind regards,

technobabylon Technobabylon (talk) 15:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 [[File:Information orange.svg|left|25px|alt=Information icon]] As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|mandatory paid editing disclosure]] requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the '''mandatory requirements under the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation.''' Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at [[User:Technobabylon]], and the template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=Technobabylon|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Uw-paid2 --> [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
+:Dear Theroadislong,
+:I confirm that I am NOT in any way being paid to write any articles and have no association with any of the subjects of my articles (Evgueni Ivantsov or European Risk Management Council). I find it very disappointing that such sweeping remarks are made about myself simply based on guesses and assumptions on your part without any evidence of me having a financial stake in the subject. I will make the necessary edits to the articles where required, but I would like to request for yourself to please refrain from jumping to conclusions or making false accusations about myself and my work. With that being said, I very much hope I can continue to edit and post further articles in the future.
+:Kind regards,
+:technobabylon  [[User:Technobabylon|Technobabylon]] ([[User talk:Technobabylon#top|talk]]) 15:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)