Talk:Neighbourhoods in Regina, Saskatchewan: Difference between revisions
Flamebroil (talk | contribs) + templates |
Mayor Quimby (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===Wha?=== |
===Wha?=== |
||
What is Uni Park and what is Rochdale? Are those neighbourhoods in Regina? I think not. I second (or third?) the notion that the new article on [[Regina Neighbourhoods]] be expanded to include information other neighbourhoods. There ''are'' neighbourhoods worthy of a few words. Then that article should be summarised in a short paragraph which should appear as a section in the [[Regina, Saskatchewan]] article (as per [[User:Friesguy|Friesguy]] on the other talk page). This way the NC section is not 'buried away from site'. Posted the same message on the other article. -- [[User:Mumun man|Mumun 無文]] 15:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC) |
What is Uni Park and what is Rochdale? Are those neighbourhoods in Regina? I think not. I second (or third?) the notion that the new article on [[Regina Neighbourhoods]] be expanded to include information other neighbourhoods. There ''are'' neighbourhoods worthy of a few words. Then that article should be summarised in a short paragraph which should appear as a section in the [[Regina, Saskatchewan]] article (as per [[User:Friesguy|Friesguy]] on the other talk page). This way the NC section is not 'buried away from site'. Posted the same message on the other article. -- [[User:Mumun man|Mumun 無文]] 15:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
If you had first hand knowledge of Regina you would know that those are areas of town. I feel your lack of knowledge should disqualify you from editting this article. That and your continued wiki-terrorism.--[[User:Mayor Quimby|Mayor Quimby]] 15:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:45, 21 March 2007
 | Canada B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Local Issues
Why can we not have a local issues section on the main page ?--206.163.235.114 22:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
This page is redundant and should be moved to the main page and included under local issues. It make more sense to have it in that category, as a neighbourhoods section would be limited, mostly stats, and there is not much difference between Uni Park and Rochdale.I ask that you stop removing these remarks. I understand that they don't jive with your "glass is 1/2 full" attitidue but try to have an open mind.--Mayor Quimby 15:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Sources
I came across this page [1], which discusses demographical information for each neighbourhood. Statistical information is fine, but hopefully there are other sources that provide more substance (perhaps unique characteristics of a neighbourhood, history, amenities, etc). Does anyone know of any? Perhaps neighbourhood association websites? --Kmsiever 19:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Wha?
What is Uni Park and what is Rochdale? Are those neighbourhoods in Regina? I think not. I second (or third?) the notion that the new article on Regina Neighbourhoods be expanded to include information other neighbourhoods. There are neighbourhoods worthy of a few words. Then that article should be summarised in a short paragraph which should appear as a section in the Regina, Saskatchewan article (as per Friesguy on the other talk page). This way the NC section is not 'buried away from site'. Posted the same message on the other article. -- Mumun 無文 15:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
If you had first hand knowledge of Regina you would know that those are areas of town. I feel your lack of knowledge should disqualify you from editting this article. That and your continued wiki-terrorism.--Mayor Quimby 15:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)