Jump to content

Talk:PL-15: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MilHistBot (talk | contribs)
Automatic MILHIST checklist assessment - Start class
Line 5: Line 5:


Hi, I removed the citation for this missile being available for the JF-17 because "Military Watch Magazine" is an amateur blog with a lot of wild unsubstantiated claims. [[User:Ghost1736|Ghost1736]] ([[User talk:Ghost1736|talk]]) 05:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the citation for this missile being available for the JF-17 because "Military Watch Magazine" is an amateur blog with a lot of wild unsubstantiated claims. [[User:Ghost1736|Ghost1736]] ([[User talk:Ghost1736|talk]]) 05:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

== clarification of text needed ==

What is this supposed to mean:
"Compared to ramjet-powered Meteor, which advantages in sustained flight profile with a fly-out speed between Mach 3 and 3.5, the dual-pulsed solid propellant rocket motor of PL-15 potentially offers higher burn-out speed excess of Mach 5, then gradually loses its velocity at the terminal phase."
If it intends to say, "the Meteor has advantages in sustained flight..." please omit the comma after Meteor.
Also, the phrase "which advantages" is awkward perhaps "with advantages" would be better. [[Special:Contributions/75.72.161.233|75.72.161.233]] ([[User talk:75.72.161.233|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:55, 6 August 2023

WikiProject iconChina Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Chinese Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Chinese military history task force

Military Watch Magazine - source credibility

Hi, I removed the citation for this missile being available for the JF-17 because "Military Watch Magazine" is an amateur blog with a lot of wild unsubstantiated claims. Ghost1736 (talk) 05:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

clarification of text needed

What is this supposed to mean: "Compared to ramjet-powered Meteor, which advantages in sustained flight profile with a fly-out speed between Mach 3 and 3.5, the dual-pulsed solid propellant rocket motor of PL-15 potentially offers higher burn-out speed excess of Mach 5, then gradually loses its velocity at the terminal phase."

If it intends to say, "the Meteor has advantages in sustained flight..." please omit the comma after Meteor. 

Also, the phrase "which advantages" is awkward perhaps "with advantages" would be better. 75.72.161.233 (talk) 18:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]