Jump to content

Talk:Milky Way: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 213.87.240.92 (talk): Better discussing in English Wikipedia by using the same said language rather than using a different one
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GAR request}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=30|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=30|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Science|class=GA}}
{{Vital article|level=3|topic=Science|class=GA}}

Revision as of 12:12, 8 August 2023

Template:Vital article

Good articleMilky Way has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 18, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 14, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 9, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Inconsistent age of HD140283

The current text reads: "Another star, HD 140283, is 14.5 ± 0.7 billion years old."

This is inconsistent with the prevailing theory of the age of the universe (around 13.8 billion years). The article on HD 140283 notes that "...more recent models of its stellar evolution have suggested revision of the star's age to 13.7 billion years."

Suggest the text be corrected to that later revision. Sbamberger (talk) 03:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The large uncertainty brings the value in line with the accepted age of the universe. Although it would be sensible to use the 13.7 billion year value here. Polyamorph (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]