Jump to content

Gandhi (film): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
revert two IP edits which ignore MOS:FILM and the embedded infobox note: "Per billing block; Ben Kingsley is listed last. See MOS:FILM."
Rajeet R (talk | contribs)
32 edits
Line 507: Line 507:
[[Category:Indian biographical drama films]]
[[Category:Indian biographical drama films]]
[[Category:Rail transport films]]
[[Category:Rail transport films]]
[[Cateogry:English-language Indian films]]

Revision as of 16:49, 11 August 2023

Gandhi
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRichard Attenborough
Written byJohn Briley
Produced byRichard Attenborough
Starring
Cinematography
Edited byJohn Bloom
Music by
Production
companies
Distributed byColumbia Pictures (through Columbia-EMI-Warner Distributors in the United Kingdom[1])
Release dates
  • 30 November 1982 (1982-11-30) (New Delhi)
  • 3 December 1982 (1982-12-03) (United Kingdom)
Running time
191 minutes[1]
Countries
  • United Kingdom
  • India
LanguageEnglish
Budget$22 million[2]
Box office$127.8 million[2]

Gandhi is a 1982 epic biographical film based on the life of Mahatma Gandhi, the leader of an Indian independence movement against the British Empire during the 20th century. A co-production between India and the United Kingdom, the historical drama was directed and produced by Richard Attenborough from a screenplay written by John Briley. It stars Ben Kingsley in the title role. The biographical film covers Gandhi's life from a defining moment in 1893, as he is thrown off from a South African train for being in a whites-only compartment and concludes with his assassination and funeral in 1948. Although a practising Hindu, Gandhi's embracing of other faiths, particularly Christianity and Islam, is also depicted.

Gandhi was released by Columbia Pictures in India on 30 November 1982, in the United Kingdom on 3 December, and in the United States on 8 December. It was praised for providing a historically accurate portrayal of the life of Gandhi, the Indian independence movement and the deleterious results of British colonisation on India. Its production values, costume design, and Kingsley's performance received worldwide critical acclaim. It became a commercial success, grossing $127.8 million on a $22 million budget.

The film received a leading eleven nominations at the 55th Academy Awards, winning eight (more than any other film nominated that year), including those for the Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor (for Kingsley). The film was screened retrospectively on 12 August 2016 as the opening film at the Independence Day Film Festival jointly presented by the Indian Directorate of Film Festivals and Ministry of Defence, commemorating the 70th Indian Independence Day.[3][4][5] The British Film Institute ranked it as the 34th greatest British film of the 20th century.

Plot

On 30 January 1948,[6] on his way to an evening prayer service, an elderly Gandhi is helped out for his evening walk to meet a large number of greeters and admirers. One visitor, Nathuram Godse, shoots him point blank in the chest. His state funeral is shown, the procession attended by millions of people from all walks of life, with a radio reporter speaking eloquently about Gandhi's world-changing life and works.

In June 1893, the 23-year-old Gandhi is thrown off from a South African train for being an Indian sitting in a first-class compartment, despite him having a first-class ticket.[7] Realising the laws are biased even against well-educated and successful Indians, he then decides to start a non-violent protest campaign for the rights of all Indians in South Africa, arguing that they are British subjects and entitled to the same rights and privileges as whites. After numerous arrests and unwelcome international attention, the government finally relents by recognising some rights for Indians.[8]

In 1915, as a result of his victory in South Africa, Gandhi is invited back to India, where he is now considered something of a national hero. He is urged to take up the fight for India's independence (Swaraj, Quit India) from the British Empire. Gandhi agrees, and mounts a non-violent non-cooperation campaign of unprecedented scale, coordinating millions of Indians nationwide. There are some setbacks, such as violence against the protesters or by the protesters themselves, Gandhi's occasional imprisonment, and the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar.

Nevertheless, the campaign generates great attention, and Britain faces intense public pressure. In 1930, Gandhi protests against the British-imposed salt tax via a highly symbolic Salt March. He also travels to London for a conference concerning Britain's possible departure from India; this, however, proves fruitless. Gandhi spends much of the Second World War in prison for not supporting the war. During a period under house arrest, his wife dies. After the war ends,[9] India finally wins its independence.[10] Indians celebrate this victory, but their troubles are far from over. The country is subsequently partitioned by religion. It is decided that the northwest area and the eastern part of India (current-day Bangladesh), both places where Muslims are in the majority, will become a new country called Pakistan. It is hoped that by permitting the Muslims to live in a separate country, violence will abate. Gandhi is opposed to the idea and is even willing to allow Muhammad Ali Jinnah to become the first Prime Minister of India,[11] but the Partition of India is carried out nevertheless. Religious tensions between Hindus and Muslims erupt into nationwide violence. Repulsed by this sudden unrest, Gandhi declares a hunger strike, in which he will not eat until the fighting stops.[12] The fighting does stop eventually.

Gandhi spends his last days trying to bring about peace between both nations. He, thereby, angers many dissidents on both sides, one of whom (Godse) is involved in a conspiracy to assassinate him.[13] Gandhi is cremated and his ashes are scattered on the Ganges.[14] As this happens, viewers hear Gandhi in another voiceover from earlier in the film.

Cast

Production

This film had been Richard Attenborough's dream project, although two previous attempts at filming had failed. In 1952, Gabriel Pascal secured an agreement with the Prime Minister of India (Jawaharlal Nehru) to produce a film of Gandhi's life. However, Pascal died in 1954 before preparations were completed.[15]

In 1962 Attenborough was contacted by Motilal Kothari, an Indian-born civil servant working with the Indian High Commission in London and a devout follower of Gandhi. Kothari insisted that Attenborough meet him to discuss a film about Gandhi.[16][17] Attenborough agreed, after reading Louis Fischer's biography of Gandhi and spent the next 18 years attempting to get the film made. He was able to meet prime minister Nehru and his daughter Indira Gandhi through a connection with Lord Louis Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India. Nehru approved of the film and promised to help support its production, but his death in 1964 was one of the film's many setbacks. Attenborough would dedicate the film to the memory of Kothari, Mountbatten, and Nehru.

David Lean and Sam Spiegel had planned to make a film about Gandhi after completing The Bridge on the River Kwai, reportedly with Alec Guinness as Gandhi. Ultimately, the project was abandoned in favour of Lawrence of Arabia (1962).[18] Attenborough reluctantly approached Lean with his own Gandhi project in the late 1960s, and Lean agreed to direct the film and offered Attenborough the lead role. Instead Lean began filming Ryan's Daughter, during which time Motilai Kothari had died and the project fell apart.[19]

Attenborough again attempted to resurrect the project in 1976 with backing from Warner Brothers. Then prime minister Indira Gandhi declared a state of emergency in India and shooting would be impossible. Co-producer Rani Dube persuaded prime minister Indira Gandhi to provide the first $10 million from the National Film Development Corporation of India, chaired by D. V. S. Raju at that time, on the back of which the remainder of the funding was finally raised.[20][21] Finally in 1980 Attenborough was able to secure the remainder of the funding needed to make the film. Screenwriter John Briley had introduced him to Jake Eberts, the chief executive at the new Goldcrest production company that raised approximately two-thirds of the film's budget.

Shooting began on 26 November 1980 and ended on 10 May 1981. Some scenes were shot near Koilwar Bridge, in Bihar.[22] Over 300,000 extras were used in the funeral scene, the most for any film, according to Guinness World Records.[23]

Casting

During pre-production, there was much speculation as to who would play the role of Gandhi.[24][25] The choice was Ben Kingsley, who is partly of Indian heritage (his father was Gujarati and his birth name is Krishna Bhanji).[26]

Release

Gandhi premiered in New Delhi, India on 30 November 1982. Two days later, on 2 December, it had a Royal Premiere at the Odeon Leicester Square in London[27] in the presence of Prince Charles and Princess Diana before opening to the public the following day.[28][29] The film had a limited release in the US starting on Wednesday, 8 December 1982, followed by a wider release in January 1983.[2] In February 1983 it opened on two screens in India as well as opening nationwide in the UK and expanding into other countries.[30]

Reception

Critical response

Reviews were broadly positive not only in India but also internationally.[31] The film was discussed or reviewed in Newsweek,[24] Time,[32] the Washington Post,[33][34] The Public Historian,[35] Cross Currents,[36] The Journal of Asian Studies,[37] Film Quarterly,[38] The Progressive,[39] The Christian Century[39] and elsewhere.[40] Ben Kingsley's performance was especially praised. Among the few who took a more negative view of the film, historian Lawrence James called it "pure hagiography"[41] while anthropologist Akhil Gupta said it "suffers from tepid direction and a superficial and misleading interpretation of history."[42] Also Indian novelist Makarand R. Paranjape has written that "Gandhi, though hagiographical, follow a mimetic style of film-making in which cinema, the visual image itself, is supposed to portray or reflect 'reality'".[43] The film was also criticised by some right-wing commentators who objected to the film's advocacy of nonviolence, including Pat Buchanan, Emmett Tyrrell, and especially Richard Grenier.[39][44] In Time, Richard Schickel wrote that in portraying Gandhi's "spiritual presence... Kingsley is nothing short of astonishing."[32]: 97  A "singular virtue" of the film is that "its title figure is also a character in the usual dramatic sense of the term." Schickel viewed Attenborough's directorial style as having "a conventional handsomeness that is more predictable than enlivening," but this "stylistic self-denial serves to keep one's attention fastened where it belongs: on a persuasive, if perhaps debatable vision of Gandhi's spirit, and on the remarkable actor who has caught its light in all its seasons."[32]: 97  Roger Ebert gave the film four stars and called it a "remarkable experience",[45] and placed it 5th on his 10 best films of 1983.[46]

In Newsweek, Jack Kroll stated that "There are very few movies that absolutely must be seen. Sir Richard Attenborough's Gandhi is one of them."[24] The movie "deals with a subject of great importance... with a mixture of high intelligence and immediate emotional impact... [and] Ben Kingsley... gives what is possibly the most astonishing biographical performance in screen history." Kroll stated that the screenplay's "least persuasive characters are Gandhi's Western allies and acolytes" such as an English cleric and an American journalist, but that "Attenborough's 'old-fashioned' style is exactly right for the no-tricks, no-phony-psychologizing quality he wants."[24] Furthermore, Attenborough

mounts a powerful challenge to his audience by presenting Gandhi as the most profound and effective of revolutionaries, creating out of a fierce personal discipline a chain reaction that led to tremendous historical consequences. At a time of deep political unrest, economic dislocation and nuclear anxiety, seeing "Gandhi" is an experience that will change many minds and hearts.[24]

According to the Museum of Broadcast Communications there was "a cycle of film and television productions which emerged during the first half of the 1980s, which seemed to indicate Britain's growing preoccupation with India, Empire and a particular aspect of British cultural history".[47] In addition to Gandhi, this cycle also included Heat and Dust (1983), Octopussy (1983), The Jewel in the Crown (1984), The Far Pavilions (1984) and A Passage to India (1984).

Patrick French negatively reviewed the film, writing in The Telegraph:

An important origin of one myth about Gandhi was Richard Attenborough's 1982 film. Take the episode when the newly arrived Gandhi is ejected from a first-class railway carriage at Pietermaritzburg after a white passenger objects to sharing space with a "coolie" (an Indian indentured labourer). In fact, Gandhi's demand to be allowed to travel first-class was accepted by the railway company. Rather than marking the start of a campaign against racial oppression, as legend has it, this episode was the start of a campaign to extend racial segregation in South Africa. Gandhi was adamant that "respectable Indians" should not be obliged to use the same facilities as "raw Kaffirs". He petitioned the authorities in the port city of Durban, where he practised law, to end the indignity of making Indians use the same entrance to the post office as blacks, and counted it a victory when three doors were introduced: one for Europeans, one for Asiatics and one for Natives.[48]

Richard Grenier in his 1983 article, "The Gandhi Nobody Knows", which was also the title of the book of the same name and topic, also criticised the film, arguing it misportrayed him as a "saint". He also alleged the Indian government admitted to financing about a third of the film's budget.[49] Grenier's book later became an inspiration for G. B. Singh's book Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity. Parts of the book also discuss the film negatively.

In the DVD edition of the 1998 film Jinnah, the director's commentary of the film makes mention of the 1982 film. In the commentary, both Sir Christopher Lee, who portrayed the older Muhammed Ali Jinnah, and director Jamil Dehlavi criticised the film Gandhi for its portrayal of Jinnah, arguing it to be demonising and historically inaccurate.[citation needed]

One notable person, Mark Boyle (better known as "The Moneyless Man") has stated that watching the film was the moment that changed his life and said that after that, he took Mahatma Gandhi's message of peace and non-violence to heart and that the film inspired him to become an activist.[50][51]

Review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes retrospectively collected 108 reviews and judged 89% of them to be positive, with an average rating of 8.30/10. The website's critical consensus reads: "Director Richard Attenborough is typically sympathetic and sure-handed, but it's Ben Kingsley's magnetic performance that acts as the linchpin for this sprawling, lengthy biopic."[52] Metacritic gave the film a score of 79 out of 100 based on 16 critical reviews, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[53] CinemaScore reported that audiences gave the film a rare "A+" grade.[54] In 2010, the Independent Film & Television Alliance selected the film as one of the 30 Most Significant Independent Films of the last 30 years.[55]

Box office

The film grossed $81,917 in its first 6 days at the Odeon Leicester Square in London.[56] In the United States and Canada, it grossed $183,583 in its first 5 days from 4 theatres (Ziegfeld Theatre in New York City; Uptown Theater in Washington D.C.; Century Plaza in Los Angeles; and the York in Toronto).[57] Due to the running time, it could be shown only three times a day.[58] It went on to gross US$52,767,889 in the United States and Canada,[2] the 12th highest-grossing film of 1982.[59]

Outside of the United States and Canada, the film grossed US$75 million in the rest of the world, the third highest for the year.[2]

In the United Kingdom, the film grossed £7.7 million (£22.3 million adjusted for inflation).[60][61] It is one of the top ten highest-grossing British independent films of all time adjusted for inflation.[60]

In India, it was one of the highest-grossing films of all-time (and the highest for a foreign film[30]) during the time of its release by earning over ₹100 crore or 1 billion rupees. At today's exchange rate, that amounts to US$14.9 million, still making it one of the highest-grossing imported films in the country. It was shown tax free in Bombay (known as Mumbai since 1995) and Delhi.[31]

The film grossed a total of $127.8 million worldwide.[2] Goldcrest Films invested £5,076,000 in the film and received £11,461,000 in return, earning them a profit of £6,385,000.[62]

Accolades

Award Category Recipients Result Ref(s)
Academy Awards Best Picture Richard Attenborough Won [63]
Best Director Won
Best Actor Ben Kingsley Won
Best Screenplay – Written Directly for the Screen John Briley Won
Best Art Direction Art Direction: Stuart Craig and Robert W. Laing;
Set Decoration: Michael Seirton 		Won
Best Cinematography Billy Williams and Ronnie Taylor Won
Best Costume Design John Mollo and Bhanu Athaiya Won
Best Film Editing John Bloom Won
Best Makeup Tom Smith Nominated
Best Original Score Ravi Shankar and George Fenton Nominated
Best Sound Gerry Humphreys, Robin O'Donoghue, Jonathan Bates and Simon Kaye Nominated
American Cinema Editors Awards Best Edited Feature Film John Bloom Won [citation needed]
British Academy Film Awards Best Film Richard Attenborough Won [64]
Best Direction Won
Best Actor in a Leading Role Ben Kingsley Won
Best Actor in a Supporting Role Edward Fox Nominated
Roshan Seth Nominated
Best Actress in a Supporting Role Candice Bergen Nominated
Rohini Hattangadi Won
Best Screenplay John Briley Nominated
Best Cinematography Billy Williams and Ronnie Taylor Nominated
Best Costume Design John Mollo and Bhanu Athaiya Nominated
Best Film Editing John Bloom Nominated
Best Make Up Artist Tom Smith Nominated
Best Production Design/Art Direction Stuart Craig Nominated
Best Score Ravi Shankar and George Fenton Nominated
Best Sound Gerry Humphreys, Robin O'Donoghue and Jonathan Bates and Simon Kaye Nominated
Most Promising Newcomer to Leading Film Roles Ben Kingsley Won
British Society of Cinematographers Best Cinematography Billy Williams and Ronnie Taylor Won [65]
David di Donatello Awards Best Foreign Film Richard Attenborough Won [citation needed]
Best Foreign Producer Won
Best Foreign Screenplay John Briley Nominated
European David Award Richard Attenborough Won
Directors Guild of America Awards Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Motion Pictures Won [66]
Evening Standard British Film Awards Best Actor Ben Kingsley Won [citation needed]
Golden Globe Awards Best Foreign Film Won [67]
Best Actor in a Motion Picture – Drama Ben Kingsley Won
Best Director – Motion Picture Richard Attenborough Won
Best Screenplay – Motion Picture John Briley Won
New Star of the Year – Actor Ben Kingsley Won
Grammy Awards Best Album of Original Score Written for a Motion Picture or Television Special Ravi Shankar and George Fenton Nominated [68]
Japan Academy Film Prize Outstanding Foreign Language Film Nominated [citation needed]
Kansas City Film Critics Circle Awards Best Actor Ben Kingsley Won [69]
London Film Critics' Circle Awards Actor of the Year Won [citation needed]
Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards Best Film 2nd Place [70]
Best Director Richard Attenborough 2nd Place
Best Actor Ben Kingsley Won
National Board of Review Awards Best Film Won [71]
Top Ten Films Won
Best Actor Ben Kingsley Won
National Society of Film Critics Awards Best Actor 2nd Place [72]
New York Film Critics Circle Awards Best Film Won [73]
Best Actor Ben Kingsley Won

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Gandhi". British Board of Film Classification. Archived from the original on 9 January 2015. Retrieved 9 January 2015.
  2. ^ a b c d e f "Gandhi (1982) - Box Office Data, DVD and Blu-ray Sales, Movie News, Cast and Crew Information". The Numbers. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 27 January 2015.
  3. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 24 April 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  4. ^ "Independence Day Film Festival" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 September 2016. Retrieved 29 August 2016.
  5. ^ "Indian Freedom Movement showed to the world the power of non-violence and democratic principles – Shri Naidu". Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
  6. ^ pp. 18–21, Briley (1983).
  7. ^ pp. 21–24, Briley (1983).
  8. ^ Briley (1983), p. 54, represents Gandhi's final victory in South Africa by depicting General Smuts as telling Gandhi, "a Royal Commission to 'investigate' the new legislation.... I think I could guarantee they would recommend the Act be repealed.... You yourself are free from this moment.".
  9. ^ The Second World War is alluded to in three scenes in the film. Briley (1983) first presents Gandhi, soon after his return from London in the early 1930, as saying "They are preparing for war. I will not support it, but I do not intend to take advantage of their danger" (p. 146). Second, after war is underway (as indicated by a newspaper headline), Gandhi is prevented by the British from speaking when he says he will "speak against war" (p. 147); Kasturba then tells the British: "If you take my husband, I intend to speak in his place" (p. 147), although she too is prevented from speaking. Third, the famed American photographer Margaret Bourke-White and Gandhi discuss whether nonviolence could be effective against Hitler (Gandhi says: "What you cannot do is accept injustice. From Hitler – or anyone...", p. 151).
  10. ^ The British commitment to support Indian independence is indicated in the first scene set after WWII, in which the new viceroy Mountbatten arrives at Delhi Airport and then, in a press conference, announces: "We have come to crown victory with friendship – to assist at the birth of an independent India and to welcome her as an equal member in the British Commonwealth of Nations... I am here to see that I am the last British Viceroy" (Briley, 1983, p. 155).
  11. ^ Briley (1983), Gandhi to Jinnah: "I am asking Panditji [Nehru] to stand down. I want you to be the first Prime Minister of India" (p. 158).
  12. ^ In Briley (1983), Gandhi mentions he is on a "fast" (p. 168), and later says that he wants "That the fighting will stop – that you make me believe it will never start again" (p. 172).
  13. ^ Briley (1983), p. 179.
  14. ^ Briley (1983), p. 180; in the movie/screenplay, the river is not identified.
  15. ^ See Pascal, Valerie (1970). The disciple and his devil: Gabriel Pascal, Bernard Shaw. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-595-33772-9. Archived from the original on 17 December 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2016. Page 219 states that "Nehru had given his consent, which he confirmed later in a letter to Gabriel: 'I feel... that you are the man who can produce something worthwhile. I was greatly interested in what you told me about this subject [the Gandhi film] and your whole approach to it."
  16. ^ "Gandhi's Inspiring Short Stories". www.mkgandhi-sarvodaya.org. Archived from the original on 26 March 2018. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
  17. ^ Wakeman, John. World Film Directors, Volume 2. The H. W. Wilson Company, 1988, p. 79.
  18. ^ Entirely Up To You, Darling by Diana Hawkins & Richard Attenborough; paperback; Arrow Books; published 2009. ISBN 978-0-099-50304-0
  19. ^ Wakeman (1988), p. 81.
  20. ^ Wakeman (1988), p. 82.
  21. ^ Special Correspondent (14 November 2010). "Film producer D.V.S. Raju passes away". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 2 November 2013. Retrieved 24 October 2014. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  22. ^ "The ancient heritage behind our railway bridges". Rediff. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2020.
  23. ^ "Arts and media/Movies/Film extras". Guinness World Records. Archived from the original on 26 November 2005. Retrieved 27 October 2007.
  24. ^ a b c d e Jack Kroll (1982). "A magnificent life of Gandhi". Newsweek (13 December 1982): 60.
  25. ^ Kroll (1982, p. 60) mentions advocacy of Alec Guinness, John Hurt, and Dustin Hoffman, and quotes Attenborough as stating that "At one point Paramount actually said they'd give me the money if Richard Burton could play Gandhi."
  26. ^ See Jack Kroll (1982). "To be or not to be... Gandhi". Newsweek (13 December 1982): 63. – "Born Krishna Bhanji, Kingsley changed his name when he became an actor: the Kingsley comes from his paternal grandfather, who became a successful spice trader in East Africa and was known as King Clove."
  27. ^ Nigel Wolland. "70mm at the Odeon, Leicester Square". In 70mm.com. Archived from the original on 16 October 2012. Retrieved 26 August 2012.
  28. ^ "Entertainments Guide". The Guardian. 2 December 1982. p. 24.
  29. ^ "Attending premiere of "Gandhi" December 2nd 1982". Princess Diana Remembered. 2 December 1982. Archived from the original on 28 April 2014. Retrieved 26 August 2012.
  30. ^ a b "'Tootsie,' 'Gandhi' Hit $120-Mil Abroad, Despite Hard Dollar Drag". Variety. 15 June 1983. p. 5.
  31. ^ a b Makarand R Paranjape (30 January 2015). The Death and Afterlife of Mahatma Gandhi. ISBN 9788184006834. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
  32. ^ a b c Richard Schickel (6 December 1982). "Cinema: Triumph of a martyr [review of Gandhi, film by Richard Attenborough]". Time. Vol. 120. p. 97. Archived from the original on 22 January 2011. Retrieved 7 March 2011.
  33. ^ Christian Williams (6 December 1982). "Passage to 'Gandhi'; Attenborough's struggle to bring the Mahatma's life to the screen". Washington Post. pp. Show, F1.
  34. ^ Coleman McCarthy (2 January 1983). "'Gandhi': Introduction to a moral teacher". Washington Post. pp. Style, K2.
  35. ^ Stephen Hay (1983). "Review: Attenborough's "Gandhi"". The Public Historian. 5 (3). University of California Press on behalf of the National Council on Public History: 85–94. doi:10.2307/3377031. ISSN 0272-3433. JSTOR 3377031.
  36. ^ Eknath Easwaran (1982). "Gandhi – Reflections After the Film". Cross Currents. 32 (4). Convergence: 385–388. ISSN 0011-1953.
  37. ^ Mark Juergensmeyer (1984). "Review: The Gandhi revival—a review article". The Journal of Asian Studies. 43 (2). Association for Asian Studies: 293–298. doi:10.2307/2055315. ISSN 0021-9118. JSTOR 2055315. S2CID 156062913.
  38. ^ Darius Cooper (1983). "Untitled [review of Gandhi by Richard Attenborough]". Film Quarterly. 37 (2). University of California Press: 46–50. doi:10.2307/3697391. ISSN 0015-1386. JSTOR 3697391.
  39. ^ a b c DeParle, Jason (September 1983). "Why Gandhi Drives The Neoconservatives Crazy". The Washington Monthly: 46–50.
  40. ^ Roger Ebert (1 January 1982). "Gandhi [review of film by Richard Attenborough]". Chicago Sun-Times. pp. online film review. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
  41. ^ James, Lawrence (1997). Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India. Little, Brown, and Company. p. 465. ISBN 0-312-19322-X.
  42. ^ Akhil Gupta (1983). "Review: Attenborough's truth: The politics of Gandhi" (PDF). The Threepenny Review (15). Threepenny Review: 22–23. ISSN 0275-1410. JSTOR 4383242. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016.
  43. ^ Paranjape, Makarand R. (2014). The Death and Afterlife of Mahatma Gandhi. New York: Routledge. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-415-69573-2.
  44. ^ Grenier, Richard (1983). The Gandhi Nobody Knows. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers. ISBN 0-8407-5871-5.
  45. ^ Ebert, Roger (1 January 1982). "Gandhi (1982)". The Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on 11 December 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  46. ^ Ebert's 10 Best Lists: 1967 to Present. Roger Ebert of The Chicago Sun-Times via the Internet Archive. Retrieved 18 October 2016.
  47. ^ JEWEL IN THE CROWN Archived 4 August 2012 at archive.today, Museum of Broadcast Communication
  48. ^ "Gandhi, film review: 'amazing epic'". Martin Chilton. The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
  49. ^ "The Gandhi Nobody Knows". Richard Grenier. Commentary magazine. March 1983. Archived from the original on 26 February 2009.
  50. ^ "Mark Boyle - The Moneyless Man | www.tpuc.org". www.tpuc.org. Archived from the original on 15 April 2010.
  51. ^ "I live without cash – and I manage just fine | Mark Boyle". TheGuardian.com. 28 October 2009.
  52. ^ "Gandhi (1985)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. Archived from the original on 23 May 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
  53. ^ "Gandhi Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. Archived from the original on 1 January 2019. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
  54. ^ Pamela McClintock (19 August 2011). "Why CinemaScore Matters for Box Office". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on 26 April 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2016.
  55. ^ "UPDATE: How "Toxic" Is IFTA's Best Indies?". Deadline. 10 September 2010. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
  56. ^ "West End Biz Still Soft". Variety. 15 December 1982. p. 45.
  57. ^ "Major Openings Bolster B.O.". Daily Variety. 14 December 1982. p. 1.
  58. ^ Ginsberg, Steven (21 December 1982). "'Tootsie,' 'Toy' And 'Dark Crystal' Win Big At National Box-Office". Daily Variety. p. 1.
  59. ^ "1982 Domestic Grosses". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on 27 May 2012. Retrieved 29 January 2012.
  60. ^ a b "BFI Research and Statistics" (PDF). British Film Institute. April 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 February 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2018. £22.3 million inflation-adjusted; GDP deflator 34.558
  61. ^ "Pacific Exchange Rate Service (0.57245 GBP per USD)" (PDF). UBC Sauder School of Business. University of British Columbia. 1982. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 May 2015. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
  62. ^ Eberts, Jake; Illott, Terry (1990). My indecision is final. Faber and Faber. p. 656.
  63. ^ "The 55th Academy Awards (1983) Nominees and Winners". oscars.org. Archived from the original on 5 September 2012. Retrieved 9 October 2011.
  64. ^ "BAFTA Awards: Film in 1983". BAFTA. 1983. Retrieved 16 September 2016.
  65. ^ "Best Cinematography in Feature Film" (PDF). Retrieved 3 June 2021.
  66. ^ "35th DGA Awards". Directors Guild of America Awards. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  67. ^ "Gandhi – Golden Globes". HFPA. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  68. ^ "1983 Grammy Award Winners". Grammy.com. Retrieved 1 May 2011.
  69. ^ "KCFCC Award Winners – 1980-89". kcfcc.org. 14 December 2013. Retrieved 15 May 2021.
  70. ^ "The 8th Annual Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards". Los Angeles Film Critics Association. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  71. ^ "1982 Award Winners". National Board of Review. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
  72. ^ "Past Awards". National Society of Film Critics. 19 December 2009. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  73. ^ "1982 New York Film Critics Circle Awards". Mubi. Retrieved 13 August 2021.

Further reading

  • Attenborough, Richard. In Search of Gandhi (1982), memoir on making the film
  • Hay, Stephen. "Attenborough's 'Gandhi,'" The Public Historian, 5#3 (1983), pp. 84–94 in JSTOR; evaluates the film's historical accuracy and finds it mixed in the first half of the film and good in the second half
Wikiquote has quotations related to Gandhi (film).

Cateogry:English-language Indian films

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Gandhi_(film)&oldid=1169844035"