Wittman v. Personhuballah: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
add "use mdy dates" template |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=August 2023}} |
|||
{{Infobox SCOTUS case |
{{Infobox SCOTUS case |
||
|Litigants=Wittman v. Personhuballah |
|Litigants=Wittman v. Personhuballah |
||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
[[Category:Legal history of Virginia]] |
[[Category:Legal history of Virginia]] |
||
[[Category:United States electoral redistricting case law]] |
[[Category:United States electoral redistricting case law]] |
||
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} |
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} |
||
Revision as of 02:04, 12 August 2023
| Wittman v. Personhuballah | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 21, 2016 Decided May 23, 2016 | |
| Full case name | Robert J. Wittman, et al., Appellants v. Gloria Personhuballah, et al. |
| Docket no. | 14-1504 |
| Citations | 578 U.S. ___ (more) 136 S. Ct. 1732; 195 L. Ed. 2d 37 |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the appellants lacked standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to pursue their appeal.[1] The case dealt with redistricting by the Virginia Legislature of Virginia's 3rd congressional district and allegations of gerrymandering based upon race.[1] The appeal was brought by Congressmen David Brat, Randy Forbes, and Rob Wittman.[1]
References
External links
- Text of Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___ (2016) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |