Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ludwig Ross/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re
Line 116: Line 116:
** This is one I'm not happy touching too much; the source to which this bit traces back goes into quite considerable detail about Ross's methods and alleged motives, but not from, as far as I can tell, any position of knowledge. They attribute it to generalised misery and {{lang|de|Weltschmertz}}, but I strongly suspect that mostly comes from a desire to romanticise Ross as a tortured genius and to give him some grandeur in death. One might sensibly infer that his increasing pain was a contributing factor, but I don't think we can ever know - he never explained himself - and frankly I think it's a bit irresponsible to be too speculative about "justifying" suicide. [[User:UndercoverClassicist|UndercoverClassicist]] ([[User talk:UndercoverClassicist|talk]]) 08:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
** This is one I'm not happy touching too much; the source to which this bit traces back goes into quite considerable detail about Ross's methods and alleged motives, but not from, as far as I can tell, any position of knowledge. They attribute it to generalised misery and {{lang|de|Weltschmertz}}, but I strongly suspect that mostly comes from a desire to romanticise Ross as a tortured genius and to give him some grandeur in death. One might sensibly infer that his increasing pain was a contributing factor, but I don't think we can ever know - he never explained himself - and frankly I think it's a bit irresponsible to be too speculative about "justifying" suicide. [[User:UndercoverClassicist|UndercoverClassicist]] ([[User talk:UndercoverClassicist|talk]]) 08:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
***That's fair. If the reason were known, I would say include it, but if not, I say leave it as-is. [[User:Bneu2013|Bneu2013]] ([[User talk:Bneu2013|talk]]) 05:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
***That's fair. If the reason were known, I would say include it, but if not, I say leave it as-is. [[User:Bneu2013|Bneu2013]] ([[User talk:Bneu2013|talk]]) 05:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

**Good eye and good points throughout: thank you for these and for taking the time to review. I think I've replied to all of them: mostly straightforwardly done. [[User:UndercoverClassicist|UndercoverClassicist]] ([[User talk:UndercoverClassicist|talk]]) 08:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
**Good eye and good points throughout: thank you for these and for taking the time to review. I think I've replied to all of them: mostly straightforwardly done. [[User:UndercoverClassicist|UndercoverClassicist]] ([[User talk:UndercoverClassicist|talk]]) 08:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
***You're welcome. I just need to review the sources, and then I should be able to support. [[User:Bneu2013|Bneu2013]] ([[User talk:Bneu2013|talk]]) 05:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
***You're welcome. I just need to review the sources, and then I should be able to support. [[User:Bneu2013|Bneu2013]] ([[User talk:Bneu2013|talk]]) 05:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
;Source review
;Source review
*Add {{para|via|Google Books}} and {{para|via|Internet Archive}} to all of the sources that were retrieved through these site.
*Add {{para|via|Google Books}} and {{para|via|Internet Archive}} to all of the sources that were retrieved through these site.
** Done for all those with an <nowiki>url=</nowiki> to those sites. [[User:UndercoverClassicist|UndercoverClassicist]] ([[User talk:UndercoverClassicist|talk]]) 07:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

*Do we need to include the full date for the footnotes that cite ''The Spectator Supplement'', instead of just the year?
*Do we need to include the full date for the footnotes that cite ''The Spectator Supplement'', instead of just the year?
** The Spectator is published every week, so I think so: there would have been about 52 different issues that year. [[User:UndercoverClassicist|UndercoverClassicist]] ([[User talk:UndercoverClassicist|talk]]) 07:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:23, 12 August 2023

Ludwig Ross (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator(s): UndercoverClassicist (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about the first (real) head of the Greek Archaeological Service, the meticulous, scholarly and complex Ludwig Ross. One of the many Germans to make the journey to Greece in the early years of independence, Ross played a major role in the establishment of the practice of archaeology in Greece and the early restorations on the Acropolis of Athens. He is also something of a tragic figure: he considered himself a foreigner in his native Denmark, was eventually rejected and effectively exiled by his adoptive Greek homeland, and died in misery having never really managed to integrate into German academia during the final phase of his career. I've reviewed the article recently but wrote it a little while ago; it underwent a thorough and thoughtful GA nomination conducted by User:Mike Christie. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 13:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

Comments by Bneu2013

UndercoverClassicist (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeological career in Greece
Work on the Acropolis of Athens
"Naval Records Affair" and resignation as Ephor General
Professorship at Athens
Professorship at Halle
Personal life, death and legacy
  • Per MOS:SEASON, replace "spring of 1847" with something else appropriate, like "early 1847 or the month this occurred (I know this is sometimes complicated by what the source says).
  • Was Ross's illness a reason for his suicide?
    • This is one I'm not happy touching too much; the source to which this bit traces back goes into quite considerable detail about Ross's methods and alleged motives, but not from, as far as I can tell, any position of knowledge. They attribute it to generalised misery and Weltschmertz, but I strongly suspect that mostly comes from a desire to romanticise Ross as a tortured genius and to give him some grandeur in death. One might sensibly infer that his increasing pain was a contributing factor, but I don't think we can ever know - he never explained himself - and frankly I think it's a bit irresponsible to be too speculative about "justifying" suicide. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 08:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Good eye and good points throughout: thank you for these and for taking the time to review. I think I've replied to all of them: mostly straightforwardly done. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 08:33, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Source review