User talk:203.49.228.129

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Supermassive black hole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MC Rocks (talk) 04:55, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Intel Atom, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 02:25, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Electropop, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm Bharel. I noticed that you recently removed content from Elizabeth Bay, New South Wales without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Why were the links removed? Bar Harel (talk) 04:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm StarryNightSky11. I noticed that you recently removed content from Regions of Sydney without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 01:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Regions of Sydney, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. LibStar (talk) 05:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.LibStar (talk) 06:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.LibStar (talk) 05:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kings Cross, New South Wales—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 01:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of South-Eastern Sydney for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South-Eastern Sydney, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South-Eastern Sydney until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Account

You should really create an WP:ACCOUNT given you are a regular editor. LibStar (talk) 05:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Citations

Please WP:CITE web pages properly. See Template:Cite web. LibStar (talk) 06:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! LibStar (talk) 06:57, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Violations of WP:MULTIPLE

You have been violatiing WP:MULTIPLE by pretending that the IPs Special:Contributions/49.255.185.235, Special:Contributions/2405:6E00:289:B4FC:0:0:0:0/64 and Special:Contributions/203.49.228.129 are separate persons, using them on the same articles and talk pages to re-inforce your viewpoint. Binksternet (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

That's both inaccurate and purely speculation. You're violating the law of evidence as with no proof, you have no case. Regardless of who's behind the various IPs the issue at hand has been the topic of Eastern Suburbs (Sydney) which appears to have been butchered by User:Daceyvillain with more than one person in the community completely disagreeing with his POV. Perhaps you should read the talk pages and check review edits to get the whole picture of the situation before making false accusations. It's nice to see that experienced Wikipedia editors care more about spiting and condemning IPs who have contributed positively rather than holding other editors accountable for their negative edits and deletion of information based off biased opinions and POV. This essay certainly is an accurate description of how Wikipedia operates; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_waste_your_time_in_Wikipedia 203.49.228.129 (talk) 03:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

This wouldn't be an issue if you created an account, which you have refused to do. LibStar (talk) 03:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

There's still the problem of this person adding lots of unsupported descriptive text, and also using primary sources as citations for assertions that are larger than the facts found in the sources. Both of those are violations of WP:NOR. Binksternet (talk) 14:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Instead of continuing to manipulate the situation and make more personal attacks, perhaps you should accept that a very large number of government sources disagree with your personal opinion. Daceyvillain (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps you should take your own advice User:Daceyvillain. 203.49.228.129 (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

As far as I recall you have barely provided one government source, and reading it revealed that it actually contradicted your personal opinion. Daceyvillain (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

As far as I recall you seem to repeatedly contract trachoma whenever Sydney's South Eastern Suburbs are referenced in government sources. 203.49.228.129 (talk) 07:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Why haven't you created an account yet? LibStar (talk) 09:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Question

Have you considered creating an WP:ACCOUNT? LibStar (talk) 01:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Have you considered creating an WP:ACCOUNT? And if not, why not? It's hard to track the various IPs working on this topic. Regards. LibStar (talk) 06:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Stop adding South East Sydney to articles

This had been discussed to death yet you as an anonymous IP continue to push this concept. Remember South East Sydney article got deleted? Also why haven't you created an account as a long time editor? LibStar (talk) 11:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Register an account first

Instead of hiding behind an anon IP. It's obvious you're the same person. Don't post on my talk page as an anon IP. LibStar (talk) 09:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)