Talk:Doug Mastriano: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2022/May; 2022/June; 2022/July; 2022/August; 2022/September; 2022/October; 2022/November; 2022/December; 2023/August; 2024/June;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:12, 15 August 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Doug Mastriano article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Historiography

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Not a far right politician

If Wikipedia has a policy on keeping a neutral point of view, why is he labeled far-right? That is as biased as it gets. And why aren't some liberals labeled as far-left? 173.62.201.143 (talk) 00:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please actually read WP:NPOV. It starts All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. That's why. Reliable sources refer to Mastriano as "far right". They do not refer to liberals as "far left" because liberalism is not "far left". – Muboshgu (talk) 00:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, the famously reliable sources that said that Russia stole the 2016 election, that white people are all racist, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Daryl Brooks isn't a far-left black nationalist. I see absolutely nothing wrong with unquestionably believing the lies of left-wing partisan hacks. 2600:4040:445D:C200:E125:82B9:5E0D:B414 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:25, 3 July 2023 edit Muboshgu (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 376,679 edits →Not a far right politician: Reply Tags: Reverted Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:12, 15 August 2023 edit undo 2600:4040:445d:c200:e125:82b9:5e0d:b414 (talk) →Not a far right politician: Reply Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:Please actually read [[WP:NPOV]]. It starts {{tq\|All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.}} That's why. [[WP:RS\|Reliable sources]] refer to Mastriano as "far right". They do not refer to liberals as "far left" because liberalism is not "far left". – [[User:Muboshgu\|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top\|talk]]) 00:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)		:Please actually read [[WP:NPOV]]. It starts {{tq\|All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.}} That's why. [[WP:RS\|Reliable sources]] refer to Mastriano as "far right". They do not refer to liberals as "far left" because liberalism is not "far left". – [[User:Muboshgu\|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top\|talk]]) 00:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
			::Ah yes, the famously reliable sources that said that Russia stole the 2016 election, that white people are all racist, that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Daryl Brooks isn't a far-left black nationalist. I see absolutely nothing wrong with unquestionably believing the lies of left-wing partisan hacks. [[Special:Contributions/2600:4040:445D:C200:E125:82B9:5E0D:B414\|2600:4040:445D:C200:E125:82B9:5E0D:B414]] ([[User talk:2600:4040:445D:C200:E125:82B9:5E0D:B414\|talk]]) 02:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)