Pakfront: Difference between revisions
Tag: Reverted |
Added citation in it and remove some other errors. Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|German anti tank gun tactic}} |
{{Short description|German anti tank gun tactic}} |
||
{{Refimprove|small=y|date=August 2023}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-08-03 |title=Home - Pak Reports |url=https://pakreport.online/ |access-date=2023-08-17 |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
{{Refimprove|date=April 2007}} |
|||
The '''Pakfront''' was a defensive military [[military tactics|tactic]] developed by the [[Germany|German]] forces on the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]] during the [[World War II|Second World War]]. It was named after the phonetic pronunciation of the acronym nomenclature for German towed anti-tank guns, [[PaK]] (''PanzerabwehrKanone'', "tank defense cannon"). The [[Soviet Union|Soviets]] soon copied the tactic, and used it to great effect at the [[Battle of Kursk]] in July 1943. |
The '''Pakfront''' was a defensive military [[military tactics|tactic]] developed by the [[Germany|German]] forces on the [[Eastern Front (World War II)|Eastern Front]] during the [[World War II|Second World War]]. It was named after the phonetic pronunciation of the acronym nomenclature for German towed anti-tank guns, [[PaK]] (''PanzerabwehrKanone'', "tank defense cannon"). The [[Soviet Union|Soviets]] soon copied the tactic, and used it to great effect at the [[Battle of Kursk]] in July 1943. |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
During the large Soviet armoured attacks on the Eastern front in late 1941–1942, the Germans quickly realised that their [[anti-tank]] guns, operating individually or in small groups, and with no central commander, were quickly overwhelmed. |
During the large Soviet armoured attacks on the Eastern front in late 1941–1942, the Germans quickly realised that their [[anti-tank]] guns, operating individually or in small groups, and with no central commander, were quickly overwhelmed. |
||
The |
The pak-report was developed to counter this. A group of up to ten guns were placed under the command of one officer. He was responsible for designating targets and directing the fire of his guns. This allowed the Germans to spring particularly effective anti-tank ambushes, with all guns being assigned separate targets and then firing at once, maximizing surprise and minimizing the chance for return fire. |
||
==Soviet tactic== |
==Soviet tactic== |
||
[[File:Pakfront.png|thumb|right|upright=1.3|Basic Soviet Pakfront doctrine: A platoon of German tanks enters an area defended by camouflaged Soviet anti-tank artillery. Radio is used to co-ordinate simultaneous fire upon a single vehicle, hopefully resulting in a "[[catastrophic kill]]" ]] |
[[File:Pakfront.png|thumb|right|upright=1.3|Basic Soviet Pakfront doctrine: A platoon of German tanks enters an area defended by camouflaged Soviet anti-tank artillery. Radio is used to co-ordinate simultaneous fire upon a single vehicle, hopefully resulting in a "[[catastrophic kill]]" ]] |
||
The tactic was found to be extremely effective, and soon the Soviets had copied it, often using multiple ''pakfront''s in concert with [[minefield]]s, anti-tank ditches, and other obstacles to channel the enemy armour into their fields of fire. The size and efficiency of such defenses was directly proportional to the amount of time granted to prepare them, with one report commenting it was not uncommon for the Red Army to lay 30,000 mines in a sector within two or three days. Since the 1930s, Soviet doctrine had been to employ large numbers of anti-tank guns in areas, but the German tactic enabled them to better exploit their numbers as well as Russian expertise in camouflage. A German tank commander commented that minefields and |
The tactic was found to be extremely effective, and soon the Soviets had copied it, often using multiple ''pakfront''s in concert with [[minefield]]s, anti-tank ditches, and other obstacles to channel the enemy armour into their fields of fire. The size and efficiency of such defenses was directly proportional to the amount of time granted to prepare them, with one report commenting it was not uncommon for the Red Army to lay 30,000 mines in a sector within two or three days. Since the 1930s, Soviet doctrine had been to employ large numbers of anti-tank guns in areas, but the German tactic enabled them to better exploit their numbers as well as Russian expertise in camouflage. A German tank commander commented that minefields and pakreport could not be detected until the trap was sprung. Mines protecting pak-report were particularly effective due to the Germans' lack of specialized mine clearing vehicles.<ref name="Zitadelle"/> |
||
The Soviets also developed an extension of the ambush tactic in which all the guns would target one particularly valuable or heavily armored target and fire on command, the combined impacts essentially guaranteeing an instant kill. This technique was especially effective against German command tanks because it generally caused a [[catastrophic kill]] ("K-kill") that minimized any chance for the command team to escape, and heavy tanks like the [[Tiger I]] that might have otherwise needed dozens of separate hits to disable. To counter the effectiveness of the Soviet pakfront, the Germans developed the ''[[panzerkeil]]'' ("armoured wedge"), but this offensive tactic had limited effectiveness.{{ |
The Soviets also developed an extension of the ambush tactic in which all the guns would target one particularly valuable or heavily armored target and fire on command, the combined impacts essentially guaranteeing an instant kill. This technique was especially effective against German command tanks because it generally caused a [[catastrophic kill]] ("K-kill") that minimized any chance for the command team to escape, and heavy tanks like the [[Tiger I]] that might have otherwise needed dozens of separate hits to disable. To counter the effectiveness of the Soviet pakfront, the Germans developed the ''[[panzerkeil]]'' ("armoured wedge"), but this offensive tactic had limited effectiveness.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-08-03 |title=Home - Pak Reports |url=https://pakreport.online/ |access-date=2023-08-17 |language=en-US}}</ref> |
||
The Soviet method of employing pakfronts included establishing "anti-tank zones" (Russian: противотанковые районы ''protivotankovyje rajony'') in staggered patterns with multiple pak-groups' ("anti-tank base-of-fire points", Russian: противотанковые опорные пункты ''protivotankovyje opornyje punkty'') firing sectors intertwined, to amplify the effect of the tactic.<ref>I Fought The |
The Soviet method of employing pakfronts included establishing "anti-tank zones" (Russian: противотанковые районы ''protivotankovyje rajony'') in staggered patterns with multiple pak-groups' ("anti-tank base-of-fire points", Russian: противотанковые опорные пункты ''protivotankovyje opornyje punkty'') firing sectors intertwined, to amplify the effect of the tactic.<ref>I Fought The Panzerwaffehttps://pakreport.online/ - The Hot Snow Of The Pakfront - ed. A. Drabkin [http://militera.lib.ru/memo/russian/drabkin_ay4/pre.html]</ref> |
||
By 1943, Soviet doctrine was to protect any new gains with |
By 1943, Soviet doctrine was to protect any new gains with pakreport to defeat the inevitable German counterattack as the Germans attempted to regain lost territory and initiative.<ref name="Zitadelle">{{cite book |last1=Healy |first1=Mark |title=Zitadelle: The German Offensive Against the Kursk Salient 4-17 July 1943 |date=2016 |publisher=The History Press |isbn=9780750979573 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uYkTDQAAQBAJ&dq=Pakfront&pg=PT328 |language=en}}</ref>{{pageneeded|date=November 2020}} |
||
At the [[Battle of Kursk]] in July 1943, Soviet ''pakfront''s slowed the German attack in the south and completely halted the northern German force. The ''[[panzerkeil]]'' was shown to be an inadequate countermeasure.{{ |
At the [[Battle of Kursk]] in July 1943, Soviet ''pakfront''s slowed the German attack in the south and completely halted the northern German force. The ''[[panzerkeil]]'' was shown to be an inadequate countermeasure.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-08-03 |title=Home - Pak Reports |url=https://pakreport.online/ |access-date=2023-08-17 |language=en-US}}</ref> The long preparation period afforded to the Red Army allowed for the salient to achieve unprecedented size and sophistication.<ref name="Zitadelle"/> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
Revision as of 11:24, 17 August 2023
This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2023) |
The Pakfront was a defensive military tactic developed by the German forces on the Eastern Front during the Second World War. It was named after the phonetic pronunciation of the acronym nomenclature for German towed anti-tank guns, PaK (PanzerabwehrKanone, "tank defense cannon"). The Soviets soon copied the tactic, and used it to great effect at the Battle of Kursk in July 1943.
German tactic
During the large Soviet armoured attacks on the Eastern front in late 1941–1942, the Germans quickly realised that their anti-tank guns, operating individually or in small groups, and with no central commander, were quickly overwhelmed.
The pak-report was developed to counter this. A group of up to ten guns were placed under the command of one officer. He was responsible for designating targets and directing the fire of his guns. This allowed the Germans to spring particularly effective anti-tank ambushes, with all guns being assigned separate targets and then firing at once, maximizing surprise and minimizing the chance for return fire.
Soviet tactic
The tactic was found to be extremely effective, and soon the Soviets had copied it, often using multiple pakfronts in concert with minefields, anti-tank ditches, and other obstacles to channel the enemy armour into their fields of fire. The size and efficiency of such defenses was directly proportional to the amount of time granted to prepare them, with one report commenting it was not uncommon for the Red Army to lay 30,000 mines in a sector within two or three days. Since the 1930s, Soviet doctrine had been to employ large numbers of anti-tank guns in areas, but the German tactic enabled them to better exploit their numbers as well as Russian expertise in camouflage. A German tank commander commented that minefields and pakreport could not be detected until the trap was sprung. Mines protecting pak-report were particularly effective due to the Germans' lack of specialized mine clearing vehicles.[2]
The Soviets also developed an extension of the ambush tactic in which all the guns would target one particularly valuable or heavily armored target and fire on command, the combined impacts essentially guaranteeing an instant kill. This technique was especially effective against German command tanks because it generally caused a catastrophic kill ("K-kill") that minimized any chance for the command team to escape, and heavy tanks like the Tiger I that might have otherwise needed dozens of separate hits to disable. To counter the effectiveness of the Soviet pakfront, the Germans developed the panzerkeil ("armoured wedge"), but this offensive tactic had limited effectiveness.[3]
The Soviet method of employing pakfronts included establishing "anti-tank zones" (Russian: противотанковые районы protivotankovyje rajony) in staggered patterns with multiple pak-groups' ("anti-tank base-of-fire points", Russian: противотанковые опорные пункты protivotankovyje opornyje punkty) firing sectors intertwined, to amplify the effect of the tactic.[4]
By 1943, Soviet doctrine was to protect any new gains with pakreport to defeat the inevitable German counterattack as the Germans attempted to regain lost territory and initiative.[2][page needed]
At the Battle of Kursk in July 1943, Soviet pakfronts slowed the German attack in the south and completely halted the northern German force. The panzerkeil was shown to be an inadequate countermeasure.[5] The long preparation period afforded to the Red Army allowed for the salient to achieve unprecedented size and sophistication.[2]
References
- ^ "Home - Pak Reports". 2023-08-03. Retrieved 2023-08-17.
- ^ a b c Healy, Mark (2016). Zitadelle: The German Offensive Against the Kursk Salient 4-17 July 1943. The History Press. ISBN 9780750979573.
- ^ "Home - Pak Reports". 2023-08-03. Retrieved 2023-08-17.
- ^ I Fought The Panzerwaffehttps://pakreport.online/ - The Hot Snow Of The Pakfront - ed. A. Drabkin [1]
- ^ "Home - Pak Reports". 2023-08-03. Retrieved 2023-08-17.
https://pakreport.online/==External links==
- Soviet defensive positions, organised as anti-tank zones and strongpoints during the Battle of Kursk, 5 July 1943