Jump to content

Talk:Nineteen Eighty-Four (British TV programme): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
GimmeBot (talk | contribs)
m GimmeBot updating {{ArticleHistory}}
add TV banner
Line 16: Line 16:
}}
}}
{{TelevisionWikiProject|class=Start}}
{{TelevisionWikiProject|class=Start}}
{{British TV shows project}}
==older entries==
==older entries==
Could this part here:
Could this part here:

Revision as of 19:43, 22 March 2007

Former featured articleNineteen Eighty-Four (British TV programme) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 11, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 19, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
August 25, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article
WikiProject iconTelevision Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Template:British TV shows project

older entries

Could this part here:

Most were worried by the depiction of a totalitarian governmental regime controlling the population's freedom of thought, and four Conservative Party – the government of the time – MPs tabled motions in the House of Commons for the scheduled Thursday second performance to be cancelled.

be made a little bit clearer? As I understand it, 4 MPs, from the Conservative party, wanted to not see part II. Because -- why? They didn't like the depiction of a totalitarian state? How exactly did they voice their complaint, without sounding curiously ironic. They were in effect banning free thought, right? Or did they not care how it looked. Their names, and some of their other policy decisions, might shed light on this story.

spelling error?

I believe that the location referred to the Production section of the article should be Tavistock (not Taverstock).

Google has references to both spellings. I'd consult my copy of the London A-Z if it wasn't buried under a ton of rubbish....
Also, unrelated, but, shouldn't the title be spelled Nineteen Eighty-Four (TV program). I mean, that is the way we spell "programme" in American English. Just wondering...--silverBULLET(x3) 21:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The semi-formal Wikipedia rule is more or less to use British spelling when dealing with subjects having to do with Britain (in most cases). AnonMoos 00:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How does one get a copy?

Is it possible to obtain a copy of this program from anywhere? -Timvasquez 05:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not currently, I am afraid. There was a DVD release scheduled a couple of years back, but this was kaiboshed by the Orwell estate, who didn't want two versions of the book (this and the Burton / Hurt film) to be available. Goodness knows why. Angmering 07:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I am a United States Citizen, where can I watch this film

Nowhere, at the moment, although there is some talk of a Region 1 DVD release this year. I am not sure if this will also go ahead or be stopped by the Orwell Estate, though. Angmering 07:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]