User talk:Migsmigss: Difference between revisions
Girth Summit (talk | contribs) →August 2023: Reply |
Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
:::As an uninvolved admin, the block appears to be fair. You clearly have been harassing KyleJoan as per your editing history. I agree with the unblock decline above, if you wish to be unblocked you are going to need to address your actions not point the finger at an admin. [[User:RickinBaltimore|RickinBaltimore]] ([[User talk:RickinBaltimore|talk]]) 12:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
:::As an uninvolved admin, the block appears to be fair. You clearly have been harassing KyleJoan as per your editing history. I agree with the unblock decline above, if you wish to be unblocked you are going to need to address your actions not point the finger at an admin. [[User:RickinBaltimore|RickinBaltimore]] ([[User talk:RickinBaltimore|talk]]) 12:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::By the way, I don't know why you have pinged the six users above: none of them admins, so they cannot review any unblock requests, and only one of whom has edited in the last year (and that was 8 months ago). Whatever your reason, please refrain from this sort of thing. If you post another unblock review, there's no need to ping anyone - it goes onto a list of active requests that admins peruse, just wait for someone to respond to it. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span> <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 12:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
:::By the way, I don't know why you have pinged the six users above: none of them admins, so they cannot review any unblock requests, and only one of whom has edited in the last year (and that was 8 months ago). Whatever your reason, please refrain from this sort of thing. If you post another unblock review, there's no need to ping anyone - it goes onto a list of active requests that admins peruse, just wait for someone to respond to it. [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span> <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 12:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|reason=Based on the responses of two uninvolved admins, yes, I acknowledge my mistake, and extend my apologies. I am sorry. I promise not to engage in hounding or any other form of harassment. I am willing to accept a block for a time, all I'm asking is for my block not to be indefinite. Thank you.[[User:Migsmigss|Migsmigss]] ([[User talk:Migsmigss#top|talk]]) 12:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 12:34, 23 August 2023
Let's Talk
Looking forward to working with you in creating, maintaining, and developing Wiki articles, pages, and media! Let's foster an open-minded, collaborative, and fun environment here, where seasoned editors engage in a friendly and cooperative manner in enriching both the quantity and quality of Wikipedia content, while also embracing, guiding, and even mentoring new contributors.
If you have any topic or issue you wish to discuss with me, you're welcome to create a new section down below. Let's discuss with propriety, respect, open-mindedness, and kindness—as all human beings should.
Cheers!
Migsmigss 12:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Migsmigss, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Migsmigss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC) |
Overlinking
Please actually read WP:OVERLINKING. It is not always about the amount of links.
"Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are usually not linked:
- Everyday words understood by most readers in context.
- The names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar:
- This generally includes major examples of: geographic features (e.g., the Himalayas, Pacific Ocean, South America), locations (e.g., Berlin; New York City, or just New York if the city context is already clear; London, if the context rules out London, Ontario; Japan, Brazil, Southeast Asia), languages (e.g., English, Arabic, Korean, Spanish), nationalities and ethnicities (e.g., English, British, Chinese, Turkish, African-American, Hispanic), and religions (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism)
- Common occupations
- Common units of measurement, e.g. units relating to currency, time, temperature, length, area, or volume. If both non-metric and metric equivalents are provided, as in 5 centimetres (2.0 in), usually neither unit needs to be linked, because almost all readers will understand at least one of the units.
- Dates (see § Chronological items, below)"
Countries generally should not be linked. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 03:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- "Should?" We are observing best practices and guidelines, not hard and fast rules. If it is helpful in the overall development of an article, then it must be accommodated. If it helps the content, then it is preferred, as it adheres to the principles of Wikipedia, rather than limiting an article. Thanks.
Migsmigss (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
help me in the page Marco D'Elia
the page is gone to speedy deletion and i don't know do anything extra,, please helpp!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinaGamal11 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I'm traveling right now and won't be able to do the nitty-gritty on why the article got deleted. If you're planning to create a new one, please make sure all sources and references are acceptable and verifiable, and all information included in said article are provided and supplemented with the right sources/references. Hoping you successfully publish an article this time. Will help in copyediting and then some, once I find the time.
Cheers.
Migsmigss (talk) 07:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
@MinaGamal11. I see you've restarted work on this page. Keep it up! To improve the quality of the article and avoid it getting deleted, include sufficient and verifiable information on the topic/subject, and also back all edits with reliable sources and references. Will visit the article as soon as I can, and hopefully help improve it. I'm still traveling now, but will try to help as soon as I can. All the best!
Migsmigss (talk) 17:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your time.--MinaGamal11 (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
How long have you been interested in contributing to Paul Mescal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Taron Egerton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)? Is it merely a wild coincidence that you began editing the two, both of which are in my 50 most recent contributions, after our interaction on Staz Nair (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)? KyleJoantalk 08:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Excuse me? I don't need to explain anything to you. You do not own Wikipedia, nor those articles.
- So you didn't review Wikipedia:Communication is required?[1] Part of communication is answering questions, you know? KyleJoantalk 08:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- How condescending. "Part of communication is answering questions, you know?"—Not when the process is self-incriminating. You accuse me of hounding, and then you ask questions for me to explain your accusation? (If you really wanted answers for your questions, they are readily available in my edit summary, which is accessible to anyone. But you already know that.) How laughable. How condescending.Migsmigss (talk) 10:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
August 2023
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Migsmigss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
An indefinite block for an unproven accusation of hounding? The other editor who engaged in edit warring and article ownership didn't get anything? Sorry, but this is abuse of power by ~ ToBeFree. Can some other admins check this please? I request an accountability check on admin ~ ToBeFree. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 12:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This unblock request does not address the reason for your block, which is harassment. Reading through the ANI thread, I too conclude that you have been attempting to harass KyleJoan. You are going to have to do some self-reflection and come up with a more convincing unblock request which addresses your own conduct. Girth Summit (blether) 12:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As described at ANI, I think that you have attempted to get plausible deniability for your harassment, but have failed to do so. The matter is public at ANI, a highly frequented page, so accountability is inherent. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- But an indefinite block? While the other editor in the issue walks away without getting anything? I would accept if I got blocked for a time, but I would never accept an indefinite block for this issue; the indefinite block is a disproportionate, most extreme response to the issue. I demand an accountability check on ToBeFree. This is an unfair, most disproportionate response on the issue. An injustice. Please consider my appeal, dscos, Grunt, Node_ue, Slowking Man, Orthogonal, GeneralPatton. I would accept a block for a time, but never an indefinite block, which is clearly too extreme a punishment. With this regard, I am requesting a full accountability check on ToBeFree. ThanksMigsmigss (talk) 12:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- As an uninvolved admin, the block appears to be fair. You clearly have been harassing KyleJoan as per your editing history. I agree with the unblock decline above, if you wish to be unblocked you are going to need to address your actions not point the finger at an admin. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- By the way, I don't know why you have pinged the six users above: none of them admins, so they cannot review any unblock requests, and only one of whom has edited in the last year (and that was 8 months ago). Whatever your reason, please refrain from this sort of thing. If you post another unblock review, there's no need to ping anyone - it goes onto a list of active requests that admins peruse, just wait for someone to respond to it. Girth Summit (blether) 12:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- But an indefinite block? While the other editor in the issue walks away without getting anything? I would accept if I got blocked for a time, but I would never accept an indefinite block for this issue; the indefinite block is a disproportionate, most extreme response to the issue. I demand an accountability check on ToBeFree. This is an unfair, most disproportionate response on the issue. An injustice. Please consider my appeal, dscos, Grunt, Node_ue, Slowking Man, Orthogonal, GeneralPatton. I would accept a block for a time, but never an indefinite block, which is clearly too extreme a punishment. With this regard, I am requesting a full accountability check on ToBeFree. ThanksMigsmigss (talk) 12:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Migsmigss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Based on the responses of two uninvolved admins, yes, I acknowledge my mistake, and extend my apologies. I am sorry. I promise not to engage in hounding or any other form of harassment. I am willing to accept a block for a time, all I'm asking is for my block not to be indefinite. Thank you.[[User:Migsmigss|Migsmigss]] ([[User talk:Migsmigss#top|talk]]) 12:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Based on the responses of two uninvolved admins, yes, I acknowledge my mistake, and extend my apologies. I am sorry. I promise not to engage in hounding or any other form of harassment. I am willing to accept a block for a time, all I'm asking is for my block not to be indefinite. Thank you.[[User:Migsmigss|Migsmigss]] ([[User talk:Migsmigss#top|talk]]) 12:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Based on the responses of two uninvolved admins, yes, I acknowledge my mistake, and extend my apologies. I am sorry. I promise not to engage in hounding or any other form of harassment. I am willing to accept a block for a time, all I'm asking is for my block not to be indefinite. Thank you.[[User:Migsmigss|Migsmigss]] ([[User talk:Migsmigss#top|talk]]) 12:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}