Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1-san (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting debate |
m Reverted edits by Daniel.Bryant (talk) to last version by Richardcavell |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Japan|list of Japan-related deletions]]. </small> -- [[User:Neier|Neier]] 12:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Japan|list of Japan-related deletions]]. </small> -- [[User:Neier|Neier]] 12:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
:''' <font color="#CC6600">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</font>'''<br><small> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Richardcavell|Richard Cavell]] 03:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:''' <font color="#CC6600">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</font>'''<br><small> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Richardcavell|Richard Cavell]] 03:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
:''' <font color="#CC6600">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</font>'''<br><small> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel Bryant</span>]]''' 04:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
|||
Revision as of 04:07, 23 March 2007
A character created on a message board which doesn't seem to be verifiable or having. There was a VFD 2 years ago here. Seems like if some sort of reliable source was available on the subject, it would've been noted already. There's already a mention of it in the 2ch article and I don't think this passes WP:ATT on its own so delete. Wickethewok 21:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 23:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. There are two books on 2ch AA characters commercially available that I know of (both in Japanese). Shift_JIS art lists both in its further reading section. Those should be considered reliable sources. Also, this nomination does not say what has changed (presumably for the worse) since the previous nomination, which resulted in a keep. — Gwalla | Talk 03:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Consesus can change and the article was still entirely unsourced and unnecessary. Wickethewok 04:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 12:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Richard Cavell 03:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)