User talk:Taavi: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:38, 25 August 2023

This is Taavi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 14 days

This user prefers to be notified by Notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to this user. No talkback messages are needed. Please keep conversations in one place.

Odd edit by bot

I'm looking at this edit, and I think the bot erroneously marked the edit as fixed (the edit summary included the claim that the bot added the affected page name, but it does not appear to have done so). The edit was very broken to begin with, but just wanted to let you know. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 14:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm looking at this edit, and the bot appears to have marked it as fixed despite not having fixed it. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk Indeed, it seems to do that when the report formatting is already completely broken. I thought I had fixed this already but apparently not. Taavi (talk!) 16:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk I think this is now really fixed, ping me if you see it happen again please? Taavi (talk!) 22:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 22:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note regarding changes to EFFP template

There is currently a discussion at Template talk:EFFP regarding changes to a template that is used by your bot. Thank you.. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bot down?

Not sure if you were already told or noticed, but MajavahBot appears to be unresponsive. It has not been archiving or commenting on any WP:EF/FP/R report since around ~19 hours ago (15:29, 11 July 2023 UTC), although it did edit its Bot status report page 2 hours later. – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 10:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems your change fixed it: diff:1165000895. 👍 – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Quite ironically it was broken because I was working on adding checks that would catch these kinds of programming errors automatically in the future. Taavi (talk!) 10:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't claim that is not relatable 😅. – 2804:F14:8087:2401:A9B4:1D32:7E56:C04B (talk) 11:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MajavahBot 5 approved

Hello Tavvi! Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MajavahBot 5 has been approved. Happy editing! TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting Edit on TrueNAS

For some reason the version table was removed from this page. It was cited as not idependently sourced but it was sourced directly from their documentation.

In the case of this being a conflict, who would be best to source this information? A different site that is forwarded a list of version changes from iX themselves rather than directly the documentation that iXsystems puts together?

I am at a loss here on how this is considered "not based on independent sources"? Is the official documentation not considered a source of truth?|

Furthermore, how is the version release that lists fixing bugs that prevents users from using certain elements considered "promotional"? Wsoteros (talk) 19:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 Hello Tavvi! [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MajavahBot 5]] has been approved. Happy editing! {{smiley}} [[User:TheSandDoctor|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">The</span><span style="color:#009933; font-weight:bold;">SandDoctor</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:TheSandDoctor|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 16:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
+== Interesting Edit on TrueNAS ==
+For some reason the version table was removed from this page. It was cited as not idependently sourced but it was sourced directly from their documentation.
+In the case of this being a conflict, who would be best to source this information? A different site that is forwarded a list of version changes from iX themselves rather than directly the documentation that iXsystems puts together?
+I am at a loss here on how this is considered "not based on independent sources"? Is the official documentation not considered a source of truth?|
+Furthermore, how is the version release that lists fixing bugs that prevents users from using certain elements considered "''promotional"?''  [[User:Wsoteros|Wsoteros]] ([[User talk:Wsoteros|talk]]) 19:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)