Jump to content

Classification of Arabic languages: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Line 112: Line 112:
*** [[Sudanese Arabic]]
*** [[Sudanese Arabic]]
**** [[Juba Arabic]]{{sfn|Versteegh|2014|p=306}}
**** [[Juba Arabic]]{{sfn|Versteegh|2014|p=306}}
***** [[Nubi language|Nubi Arabic]]{{sfn|Versteegh|2014|p=307}}
**** [[Nubi language|Nubi Arabic]]{{sfn|Versteegh|2014|p=307}}
** Egyptian proper
** Egyptian proper
*** [[Nile Delta]]
*** [[Nile Delta]]

Revision as of 21:25, 28 August 2023

This article is about the historical language group. For the modern general language (macrolanguage), see Arabic. For the separate South Semitic language group, see Modern South Arabian languages.
Arabian
South Central Semitic
North Arabian
Geographic
distribution		North Africa, Middle East, Malta
Linguistic classificationAfro-Asiatic
Proto-languageProto-Arabic
Language codes
Glottologarab1394

The Arabic language family is divided into several categories which are: Old Arabic, the literary varieties, and the modern vernaculars.[1]

The genealogical position of Arabic within the group of the Semitic languages has long been a problem.[2]

Views on Arabic classification

Semitic languages were confined in a relatively small geographic area (Greater Syria, Mesopotamia and the Arabian desert) and often spoken in contiguous regions. Permanent contacts between the speakers of these languages facilitated borrowing between them. Borrowing disrupts historical processes of change and makes it difficult to reconstruct the genealogy of languages.[3]

In the traditional classification of the Semitic languages, Arabic was in the Southwest Semitic group, based on some affinities with Modern South Arabian and Geʽez.[4]

Traditional classification of the Semitic languages[4]
Proto-Semitic
West SemiticEast Semitic (Akkadian)
Northwest SemiticSouthwest Semitic
Canaanite
(Hebrew, Phoenician)		AramaicArabicSouth ArabianEthiopian

Most scholars reject the Southwest Semitic subgrouping because it is not supported by any innovations and because shared features with South Arabian and Ethiopian were only due to areal diffusion.[5]

In 1976, linguist Robert Hetzron classified Arabic languages as a Central Semitic language:[6]

The genealogy of the Semitic languages (Hetzron 1974, 1976)[6]
Proto-Semitic
West SemiticEast Semitic (Akkadian)
South SemiticCentral Semitic
AramaicArabo-Canaanite
EthiopianEpigraphic South ArabianModern South ArabianArabicCanaanite

John Huehnergard, Aaron D. Rubin, and other scholars suggested subsequent modifications to Hetzron's model:[7]

Huehnergard & Pat-El's classification of Semitic languages[7]
Proto-Semitic
West SemiticEast Semitic (Akkadian)
Ethio-SemiticModern South ArabianCentral Semitic
North ArabianAncient ArabianNorthwest Semitic
Arabic-SafaiticArameo-CanaaniteUgariticSamalian
Arabic vernaculars
(inc. Levantine)		Classical Arabic and
Modern Standard Arabic		SafaiticDadanitic,
Taymanitic,
Hismaic, etc.

However, several scholars, such as Giovanni Garbini, consider that the historical–genetic interpretation is not a satisfactory way of representing the development of the Semitic languages (contrary to Indo-European languages, which spread over a wide area and were usually isolated from each other).[8] Edward Ullendorff even thinks it is impossible to establish any genetic hierarchy between Semitic languages.[6] These scholars prefer a purely typological–geographical approach without any claim to a historical derivation.[4]

For instance, in Garbini's view, the Syrian Desert was the core area of the Semitic languages where innovations came from. This region had contacts between sedentary settlements—on the desert fringe—and nomads from the desert. Some nomads joined settlements, while some settlers became isolated nomads ("Bedouinisation"). According to Garbini, this constant alternation explains how innovations spread from Syria into other areas.[9] Isolated nomads progressively spread southwards and reached South Arabia, where the South Arabian language was spoken. They established linguistic contacts back and forth between Syria and South Arabia and their languages. That is why Garbini considers that Arabic does not belong exclusively to either the Northwest Semitic languages (Aramaic, Phoenician, Hebrew, etc.) or the South Semitic languages (Modern South Arabian, Geʽez, etc.) but that it was affected by innovations in both groups.[10]

There is still no consensus regarding the exact position of Arabic within Semitic languages. The only consensus among scholars is that Arabic varieties exhibit common features with both the South (South Arabian, Ethiopic) and the North (Canaanite, Aramaic) Semitic languages, and that it also contains unique innovations.[10]

There is no consensus among scholars whether Arabic diglossia (between Classical Arabic, also called "Old Arabic" and Arabic vernaculars, also called "New Arabic" or "Neo-Arabic") was the result of the Islamic conquests and due to the influence of non-Arabic languages or whether it was already the natural state in 7th-century Arabia (which means that both types coexisted in the pre-Islamic period).[11][12][13]

Modern spoken Arabic varieties

According to Dutch linguist Kees Versteegh, modern vernaculars (also called dialects, colloquial varieties or spoken Arabic varieties) are classified as follows:[14][a][b]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Versteegh does not mention Shihhi Arabic, Dhofari Arabic, Judeo-Yemeni Arabic, Judeo-Moroccan Arabic, and Judeo-Tripolitanian Arabic.
  2. ^ Algerian Arabic, Moroccan Arabic, and Tunisian Arabic are koines.

References

  1. ^ Jallad, Ahmad (2020). "Al-Jallad. A Manual of the Historical Grammar of Arabic". Academia.edu.
  2. ^ Versteegh 2014, p. 18
  3. ^ Versteegh 2014, p. 13
  4. ^ a b c Versteegh 2014, p. 11
  5. ^ Al-Jallad, Ahmad (2020). "0. Arabic defined and its subgroupings". A Manual of the Historical Grammar of Arabic. pp. 8, 11 – via Academia.
  6. ^ a b c Versteegh 2014, p. 15
  7. ^ a b Brustad & Zuniga 2019, pp. 3–6
  8. ^ Versteegh 2014, p. 21
  9. ^ Versteegh 2014, pp. 15–16
  10. ^ a b Versteegh 2014, pp. 21–22
  11. ^ Brustad & Zuniga 2019, pp. 367–369.
  12. ^ Versteegh 2014, pp. 58–59.
  13. ^ Abboud-Haggar, Soha. "Dialects: Genesis". In Edzard, Lutz; de Jong, Rudolf (eds.). Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. doi:10.1163/1570-6699_eall_EALL_COM_0088.
  14. ^ Versteegh 2014, pp. 192–220.
  15. ^ Versteegh 2014, p. 306.
  16. ^ Versteegh 2014, p. 307.

Sources

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Classification_of_Arabic_languages&oldid=1172718373"