Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse Watson: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)
Line 3: Line 3:


<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=Muse Watson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse Watson|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 24#{{anchorencode:Muse Watson}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1171945997/cur|edits since nomination]])
:{{la|1=Muse Watson}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse Watson|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 31#{{anchorencode:Muse Watson}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1171945997/cur|edits since nomination]])
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Muse Watson}})
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Muse Watson}})
[[WP:BLP]] of an actor, not [[WP:RS|properly sourced]] as having any strong claim to passing [[WP:NACTOR]]. As always, actors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass [[WP:GNG]] on their sourceability -- but this, as written, is sourced to a directory entry, a production photograph and a glancing namecheck of his existence, which is not enough.<br>It was also formerly a lot longer and listed a lot more (supporting) roles, but none of that content was sourced either, with the result that it recently got restubbed down to this -- but even just restoring the old content wouldn't actually fix the problem, because an actor's notability resides in his sourcing and not just in the ability to list roles in and of itself.<br>Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced considerably better than this. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
[[WP:BLP]] of an actor, not [[WP:RS|properly sourced]] as having any strong claim to passing [[WP:NACTOR]]. As always, actors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass [[WP:GNG]] on their sourceability -- but this, as written, is sourced to a directory entry, a production photograph and a glancing namecheck of his existence, which is not enough.<br>It was also formerly a lot longer and listed a lot more (supporting) roles, but none of that content was sourced either, with the result that it recently got restubbed down to this -- but even just restoring the old content wouldn't actually fix the problem, because an actor's notability resides in his sourcing and not just in the ability to list roles in and of itself.<br>Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced considerably better than this. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 02:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Line 10: Line 10:
::NACTOR is not passed by ''listing'' roles, it's passed by the article ''showing'' a GNG-worthy volume of media coverage ''about'' him and the roles, and ''no'' role in ''any'' film is ''ever'' so "inherently" notable as to ''exempt'' its actor from having to be ''sourced properly''. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 15:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
::NACTOR is not passed by ''listing'' roles, it's passed by the article ''showing'' a GNG-worthy volume of media coverage ''about'' him and the roles, and ''no'' role in ''any'' film is ''ever'' so "inherently" notable as to ''exempt'' its actor from having to be ''sourced properly''. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 15:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
* '''Weak keep''' Other than the the sources in the article, I'm seeing [https://www.slashfilm.com/1068545/muse-watson-took-an-intensely-physical-approach-to-playing-i-know-what-you-did-last-summers-slasher/ slashfilm.com], [https://www.slashfilm.com/1070983/i-know-what-you-did-last-summer-needed-a-killer-who-wouldnt-stay-in-character/ another one], [https://www.thethings.com/the-cast-of-i-know-what-you-did-last-summer-killer-muse-watson/ TheThings], [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/i-know-what-you-did-last-summer-cast-then-now-jennifer-love-hewitt/anne-heche-as-melissa-missy-egan/ a paragraph in this from Hollywood Reporter], [https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1595798/ncis-why-muse-watson-leave-mike-franks-cbs Express], [https://www.hellomagazine.com/film/20230209163991/ncis-the-reason-why-mike-franks-actor-muse-watson-left/ Hello], and a lot more covering his leaving NCIS and his role in I Know What You Did Last Summer. Not the best sources, but add up to notability in my eyes. [[User:Rusalkii|<span style="color:#259a83">Rusalkii</span>]] ([[User talk:Rusalkii|talk]]) 21:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
* '''Weak keep''' Other than the the sources in the article, I'm seeing [https://www.slashfilm.com/1068545/muse-watson-took-an-intensely-physical-approach-to-playing-i-know-what-you-did-last-summers-slasher/ slashfilm.com], [https://www.slashfilm.com/1070983/i-know-what-you-did-last-summer-needed-a-killer-who-wouldnt-stay-in-character/ another one], [https://www.thethings.com/the-cast-of-i-know-what-you-did-last-summer-killer-muse-watson/ TheThings], [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/i-know-what-you-did-last-summer-cast-then-now-jennifer-love-hewitt/anne-heche-as-melissa-missy-egan/ a paragraph in this from Hollywood Reporter], [https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1595798/ncis-why-muse-watson-leave-mike-franks-cbs Express], [https://www.hellomagazine.com/film/20230209163991/ncis-the-reason-why-mike-franks-actor-muse-watson-left/ Hello], and a lot more covering his leaving NCIS and his role in I Know What You Did Last Summer. Not the best sources, but add up to notability in my eyes. [[User:Rusalkii|<span style="color:#259a83">Rusalkii</span>]] ([[User talk:Rusalkii|talk]]) 21:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 03:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Muse Watson]]</noinclude></p>

Revision as of 03:49, 31 August 2023

Muse Watson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an actor, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NACTOR. As always, actors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourceability -- but this, as written, is sourced to a directory entry, a production photograph and a glancing namecheck of his existence, which is not enough.
It was also formerly a lot longer and listed a lot more (supporting) roles, but none of that content was sourced either, with the result that it recently got restubbed down to this -- but even just restoring the old content wouldn't actually fix the problem, because an actor's notability resides in his sourcing and not just in the ability to list roles in and of itself.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced considerably better than this. Bearcat (talk) 02:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NACTOR is not passed by listing roles, it's passed by the article showing a GNG-worthy volume of media coverage about him and the roles, and no role in any film is ever so "inherently" notable as to exempt its actor from having to be sourced properly. Bearcat (talk) 15:53, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]