Jump to content

Talk:Folklorism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
rating
m The Anome moved page Talk:Folklorismus to Talk:Folkloris: to English language title
(No difference)

Revision as of 00:05, 4 September 2023

WikiProject iconFolklore Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Key element missing

We have an article that tells us

  • the subject is a concept,
  • what fields it belongs to,
  • who developed it,
  • and what it's similar to,

but that doesn't tell us what it is. Largoplazo (talk) 03:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo:: Agreed. I found this a most perplexing stub, because─ while it does briefly mention a few things in its grand total of two (2) sentences─ it never says what Folklorismus is! Which, of course, is obviously an essential part of any article... I hope someone cleans it up and adds a whole lot more detail, but most importantly this basic explanation of what this "Folklorismus" even IS soon! 00:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)~