Fig leaf: Difference between revisions
replace template |
Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
The expression ''fig leaf'' has a [[pejorative]] [[metaphor]]ical sense meaning a flimsy or minimal cover for anything or behaviour that might be considered shameful, with the implication that the cover is only a token gesture and the truth is obvious to all who choose to see it.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7746088.stm |title=Cable derides 'fig leaf' tax cuts |publisher=news.bbc.co.uk |access-date=2010-09-16 | date=2008-11-24}}</ref> |
The expression ''fig leaf'' has a [[pejorative]] [[metaphor]]ical sense meaning a flimsy or minimal cover for anything or behaviour that might be considered shameful, with the implication that the cover is only a token gesture and the truth is obvious to all who choose to see it.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7746088.stm |title=Cable derides 'fig leaf' tax cuts |publisher=news.bbc.co.uk |access-date=2010-09-16 | date=2008-11-24}}</ref> |
||
A metaphorical fig leaf is something visible but innocuous, |
A metaphorical fig leaf is something visible but innocuous, and is differentiated from a [[coverup]] in which the existence of something may be entirely hidden. A fig leaf is not a means to truly disguise something. Instead, it creates a technically unobjectionable appearance without truly disguising anything. |
||
In the context of negotiation, an offer might be characterized as a "fig leaf" if that offer is intended simply to create an excuse for excuse behavior by one or both parties that would otherwise receive third-party censure. It can be used in a positive or negative sense. In the positive sense, it is usually a means of allowing one party to avoid humiliation for accepting an offer they couldn't actually refuse anyway. In the negative sense, it can be used to force acceptance of an offer that would normally be seen as unjustifiable by third parties. |
|||
In the context of negotiation, an offer might be characterized as a "fig leaf" if that offer is actually a ploy to conceal a sinister plan. |
|||
[[File:Masaccio-TheExpulsionOfAdamAndEveFromEden-Restoration.jpg|thumb|center|200px|''[[The Expulsion from the Garden of Eden]]'', by [[Masaccio]], before and after restoration. It was painted in 1425, covered up in 1680, and restored in 1980.]] |
[[File:Masaccio-TheExpulsionOfAdamAndEveFromEden-Restoration.jpg|thumb|center|200px|''[[The Expulsion from the Garden of Eden]]'', by [[Masaccio]], before and after restoration. It was painted in 1425, covered up in 1680, and restored in 1980.]] |
Revision as of 16:17, 5 September 2023
The expression "fig leaf" is widely used figuratively to convey the covering up of an act or an object that is embarrassing or distasteful with something of innocuous appearance, a metaphorical reference to the Biblical Book of Genesis in which Adam and Eve used fig leaves to cover their nudity after eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.[2][3] Some paintings and statues have the genitals of their subjects covered by a representation of an actual fig leaf or similar object, either as part of the work or added afterward for perceived modesty.
History
In Ancient Greek art, male nakedness, including the genitals, was common, although the female vulval area was generally covered in art for public display. This tradition continued in Ancient Roman art until the conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity, when heroic nudity vanished. During the Middle Ages, only the unfortunate (most often the damned) were usually shown naked, although the depictions were then often rather explicit.[4] Adam and Eve were often shown wearing fig or other leaves, following the Biblical description. This was especially a feature of Northern Renaissance art.
From about 1530, the developing reaction to Renaissance freedoms and excesses that led to the Council of Trent also led to a number of artworks, especially in churches or public places, being altered to reduce the amount of nudity on display. Often, as in the famous case of Michelangelo's The Last Judgement, drapery or extra branches from any nearby bush was used. This has been dubbed the "fig leaf campaign".[citation needed] For free-standing statues this did not work well, and carved or cast fig leaves were sometimes added, such as with the plaster copy of Michelangelo's David displayed in Victorian era London.[5] Historian Daniel J. Boorstin said that:
The age of the rising middle class in Victorian England was, or course, the age of the fig leaf. "The fig leaves of decent reticence" which Charles Kingsley described were applied not only to statuary but to literature as well.[6]
The Adam and Eve panels on the Ghent Altarpiece, already equipped with fig leaves by Jan van Eyck, were simply replaced with 19th-century panels copying the figures but clothed. Many of these alterations have since been reversed, damaging some of the statues.
Modern day
Eugen Sandow, often considered the first modern-day bodybuilder, was an admirer of the human physique. In addition to strongman sideshows, he performed "muscle displays" by posing in the nude—save for a fig leaf that he would don in imitation of statues he had seen in Italy as a boy.[7]
Metaphorical use
The expression fig leaf has a pejorative metaphorical sense meaning a flimsy or minimal cover for anything or behaviour that might be considered shameful, with the implication that the cover is only a token gesture and the truth is obvious to all who choose to see it.[8]
A metaphorical fig leaf is something visible but innocuous, and is differentiated from a coverup in which the existence of something may be entirely hidden. A fig leaf is not a means to truly disguise something. Instead, it creates a technically unobjectionable appearance without truly disguising anything.
In the context of negotiation, an offer might be characterized as a "fig leaf" if that offer is intended simply to create an excuse for excuse behavior by one or both parties that would otherwise receive third-party censure. It can be used in a positive or negative sense. In the positive sense, it is usually a means of allowing one party to avoid humiliation for accepting an offer they couldn't actually refuse anyway. In the negative sense, it can be used to force acceptance of an offer that would normally be seen as unjustifiable by third parties.
See also
- Censorship
- Christian naturism
- Expurgation, also known as a "fig-leaf edition"
- Olive branch
Citations
- ^ "Fig-leaf for Michelangelo's David". Collections. V&A Museum. Retrieved 5 March 2009.
- ^ Genesis 3:7. WikiSource. "...and they sewed fig leaves and made themselves waist-belts"
- ^ "Genesis 3:7 (several translations)". BibleGateway.com. Retrieved 2019-08-06.
- ^ Clark, Kenneth (1956). The Nude, A Study in Ideal Form. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01788-3.
- ^ "David's Fig Leaf". Victoria & Albert Museum. Archived from the original on 2007-06-03. Retrieved 2017-02-08.
- ^ Boorstin, Daniel J. (1962). The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America. ISBN 978-0679741800.
- ^ Anderson, R. Christian. "Sandow Wearing a Figleaf". SandowMuseum.com. Retrieved 2007-05-29.
- ^ "Cable derides 'fig leaf' tax cuts". news.bbc.co.uk. 2008-11-24. Retrieved 2010-09-16.
General bibliography
- Kuh, Richard H (1967). Foolish Figleaves?: Pornography in and Out of Court (2nd ed.). Macmillan.