Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndiaFilings.com: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:48, 6 September 2023

IndiaFilings.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, probably an Advertisement by the company. KnightMight (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and India. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Tamil Nadu. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I see some reliable sources, such as The Hindu Business Line, The Economic Times, Business Standard India, and The New Indian Express, have covered various facets of the company. --Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep As well as the sources mentioned by Mozzcircuit, IndiaFilings has also been covered by The Times of India. Some of the sources in the article seem a little promotional/frivolous, especially the paywalled Economic Times articles, but generally I think this company has just about enough significant reliable coverage to warrant an article, unless non-independence of sources can be proven. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 14:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:CORP. There are zero WP:SIRS sources meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. I checked all in the article (including the ones I removed because they didn't verify attached claims) and did a cursory BEFORE to seek others. The only potential ATD would be a one-sentence merge to DBS Bank#India, but that may be UNDUE. —siro χ o 23:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no coverage outside of routine announcements, publicity and press, interviews, etc. I believe it's not suitable for inclusion at this point in time. Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looks Clears the bar of WP:CORP, WP:SIRS and WP:CORPDEPTH. Here are some sources I have found- 1. The Hindu. 2. Economic Times. 3. New Indian Express. 4. Economic Times. 5. New Indian Express. 6. Economic Times.Bekujoq (talk) 09:04, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here's a source assessment table. —siro χ o 09:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table prepared by User:siroxo
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
TH NARAYANAN V[1]	depends heavily on voice of founder, doesn't meet SIRS		~	✘ No
Economic Times, Vinay Dwivedi[2]	as above		~	✘ No
New Indian Express, Praveen Kumar[3]	as above		~	✘ No
Economic Times, Maleeva Rebello[4]	as above			✘ No
New Indian Express, "ANI"[5]	WP:NEWSORGINDIA paid news	WP:NEWSORGINDIA paid news	~	✘ No
BT, Binu Paul[6]	depends heavily on voice of founder, doesn't meet SIRS			✘ No
Business Standard[7]	heavily dependent on business partner		No CORPDEPTH but could be used to add a sentence to DBS Bank § India	✘ No
BW, Resham Suhail[8]	fully an interview with employee			✘ No
Free Press Journal, FPJ Web Desk[9]	WP:NEWSORGINDIA paid news	WP:NEWSORGINDIA paid news	~	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if those editors advocating Keep care to respond to the source assessment table.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with source analysis - all coverage reads as a press release. BrigadierG (talk) 23:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on the source table above. Most of the sources look like press-release stuff. Oaktree b (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:27, 5 September 2023 edit BrigadierG (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 2,350 edits →IndiaFilings.com: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:48, 6 September 2023 edit undo Oaktree b (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers 24,475 edits →IndiaFilings.com: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:

	:'''Delete''' agree with source analysis - all coverage reads as a press release. <span style="color:#ef5224">[[User:BrigadierG\|BrigadierG]]</span> ([[User talk:BrigadierG\|talk]]) 23:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)		:'''Delete''' agree with source analysis - all coverage reads as a press release. <span style="color:#ef5224">[[User:BrigadierG\|BrigadierG]]</span> ([[User talk:BrigadierG\|talk]]) 23:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
			::Delete based on the source table above. Most of the sources look like press-release stuff. [[User:Oaktree b\|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b\|talk]]) 00:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)